Total votes: 7
Full forfeit, even though it was only one round.
Both produced equal arguments, from my perspective. No sources. Pro used slang. Con forfeited two rounds.
Con produced better arguments. Con had more and better sources. Both had acceptable spelling and grammar. Pro forfeited almost every round and in addition to that, he conceded the whole debate in the final round.
Full forfeiture on Pro's side. No sources were used.
I felt Con had better rhymes and a better feel. No sources were used. Both had acceptable spelling and grammar. Pro was ruder than Con because of this: "It wasn't personal, but that's the most amount of fucks that I care to give."
Now, if you (Wrick-It-Ralph) are angry with my vote, let me tell you a fact, I vote TRUTHFULLY.
I felt that Pro had better rhymes and a better flow than Con. There were no sources used. Pro used a lot of slang and American English but Con did not.
Lastly, Pro was very rude to Con and Club should have won this last criterion but he forfeited the last round, so I can only award it as a tie.
No arguments or rebuttals from either side, so I must award it as a tie.