Typical leftists always claiming blacks are victims. There is no systemic racism. Stop playing the victim and figure you black problems out. Racism is such a tiny problem and you don't focus on the bigger problems within the black communities. Listen to Candace Owens.
Pinkfreud is a dumb voter. Votes don't exactly prove who was right. Most of your points have nothing to do with race. The one who is closed-minded is the one who doesn't even research the meaning behind stuff.
Is that anywhere in the CoC? It's not even fine print, it's literally a description. You can't simply reject the rules. If you don't like the rules, then you don't accept. By accepting, you consent to the rules. It is not on my blame to make different rules. You can't just vote against me because you arbitrarily decide you don't like the rules, especially as a mod.
I didn't say it was totally unwinnable, I said it was highly unlikely. Rules are rules. The contender that accepts the debate knows what he is getting into. It is not fair to the rules and the debate.
"As a voter I don’t accept or enforce rules that would prevent one side from winning before an argument has been posted."
It is con's fault that he accepted. He saw the rules.
It is pretty much unwinnable. I shouldn't get a consequence for creating the debate. The contender accepted it knowingly, I shouldn't take the blame for the fault of the contender. If you don't think it is winnable, then don't accept it.
God makes it very clear that people go to hell if they reject Christ. God made all people and things and loves us so much, but if people willfully reject Christ then the punishment is Hell. God is against abortion. Abortion is murder. He wants people to have an earthly life and choose if we love him.
Like I said, it is wise to listen to God and not yourself because God has a plan for everything beyond our capability of knowledge. Trying to justify something for God is bad because God is the source for all right and wrong, due justice and mercy. Maybe you will understand when your autism gets better.
Abortion is murder. It's legality does not have to do with it. God's standards are. Small counts as anyone, mainly children, who are incapable or too young too fully understand the concept of Christ.
"Life is valuable, heaven is priceless. What's better for the kid, especially if before 20 weeks?"
The kid will grow up and have the choice to accept God. God gives us free will, that's how much he loves us. God is against abortion. Overall, God has a plan for anything that isn't in our grasp to understand.
So you concede small children go to heaven? It is disgusting to suggest God is pro-abortion. He created every baby uniquely from the moment of conception. He wants them to have a life. He is strictly against murder, and abortion is murder.
Oh i thought u didn't like to forfeit rounds. What a shame you are going against rules you thought were stupid. Dont u want to maximize argument space? smh hypocrit
However, another point may be helpful in answering this question. While infants and children have neither sensed their personal sin and need for salvation nor placed their faith in Christ, Scripture teaches that condemnation is based on the clear rejection of God's revelation--whether general or specific--not simple ignorance of it (Luke 10:16; John 12:48; 1 Thess. 4:8).
Can we definitely say that the unborn and young children have comprehended the truth displayed by God's general revelation that renders them "without excuse" (Rom. 1:18-20)? They will be judged according to the light they received. Scripture is clear that children and the unborn have original sin--including both the propensity to sin as well as the inherent guilt of original sin. But could it be that somehow Christ's atonement did pay for the guilt for these helpless ones throughout all time? Yes, and therefore it is a credible assumption that a child who dies at an age too young to have made a conscious, willful rejection of Jesus Christ will be taken to be with the Lord.
Second Samuel 12:23 is one of the passages often quoted to imply that babies go to heaven. Though the verse doesn't explicitly say that, David clearly does expect to one day be reunited with his departed child. Since we know David is a believer whose destiny was heaven, we can infer that his hope of reunion means he expected his child to be in heaven. Thus, 2 Samuel 12:23 suggests strong evidence for a heavenly destiny of the unborn and children who die young.
If this were all we had to support our position, it would be admittedly less than stalwart. However, there are other evidences that point us to the same conclusion. First, the Bible clearly teaches that God cares deeply for children. Passages like Matthew 18:1-6 and 19:13-15 affirm the Lord's love for them. Those verses don't state that children go to heaven, but they do show God's heart toward children. He created and cares for children, and beyond that, He always accomplishes His perfect will in every circumstance.
The psalmist reminds us that God is "full of compassion and gracious, longsuffering and abundant in mercy and truth" (Ps. 86:15). He is the God who became flesh that He might carry our sins away by His death on the cross (2 Cor. 5:21). He is the God who will comfort Christians in heaven, for "He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death; nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain" (Rev. 21:4). We can be assured that God will do what is right and loving because He is the standard of rightness and love. Those considerations alone seem to be evidence enough of God's particular, electing love shown to the unborn and those who die young.
Great, another round of snoopy's abstract ideas that have no data, statistics, or real significance to back it up. Should have gotten a better opponent smh.
Typical leftists always claiming blacks are victims. There is no systemic racism. Stop playing the victim and figure you black problems out. Racism is such a tiny problem and you don't focus on the bigger problems within the black communities. Listen to Candace Owens.
Perhaps, at least they would be logical about it.
ok will do
lol its not like its gonna make a difference anyway
You failed to post in time. I've gave you multiple chances, even created this new debate as a result of your previous forfeit. That's on you, not me.
There are literally no conservatives that vote on this site.
You have had multiple chances. I'm not posting an argument from the comments.
Truism debates are troll debates defined by the CoC.
lol im not desperate for wins u literally just violated the rules...
Voters,
Con violated the waive rule in his final round and made another argument. This is an automatic loss of argument and conduct point, per the rules.
You accidentally voted for the wrong side lol
most liberals on this site that vote have inherent bias
Everyone on this site that votes is liberal.
Pinkfreud isnt my goto gy when it comes to voting critique.
Pinkfreud is a dumb voter. Votes don't exactly prove who was right. Most of your points have nothing to do with race. The one who is closed-minded is the one who doesn't even research the meaning behind stuff.
I will try, but I can't promise I will be able to make one in time with finals and everything.
Speedrace has no logic whatsoever in most of his points, so I will pass. I don't debate with closed-minded people.
i believe u mean "ineligible" not "illegible--Not able to read"
lmao
Is that anywhere in the CoC? It's not even fine print, it's literally a description. You can't simply reject the rules. If you don't like the rules, then you don't accept. By accepting, you consent to the rules. It is not on my blame to make different rules. You can't just vote against me because you arbitrarily decide you don't like the rules, especially as a mod.
I didn't say it was totally unwinnable, I said it was highly unlikely. Rules are rules. The contender that accepts the debate knows what he is getting into. It is not fair to the rules and the debate.
"As a voter I don’t accept or enforce rules that would prevent one side from winning before an argument has been posted."
It is con's fault that he accepted. He saw the rules.
It is pretty much unwinnable. I shouldn't get a consequence for creating the debate. The contender accepted it knowingly, I shouldn't take the blame for the fault of the contender. If you don't think it is winnable, then don't accept it.
Can you vote on this?
lol u literally have to argue semantics in order to win
oh ok
copy what?
You didn't remove it.
LOL
God makes it very clear that people go to hell if they reject Christ. God made all people and things and loves us so much, but if people willfully reject Christ then the punishment is Hell. God is against abortion. Abortion is murder. He wants people to have an earthly life and choose if we love him.
Like I said, it is wise to listen to God and not yourself because God has a plan for everything beyond our capability of knowledge. Trying to justify something for God is bad because God is the source for all right and wrong, due justice and mercy. Maybe you will understand when your autism gets better.
Abortion is murder. God is against abortion. You are trying to fix a solution that seems just to you. Only God understands.
My point was whether it is legal or not does not make it morally right or not murder.
Abortion is murder. It's legality does not have to do with it. God's standards are. Small counts as anyone, mainly children, who are incapable or too young too fully understand the concept of Christ.
"Life is valuable, heaven is priceless. What's better for the kid, especially if before 20 weeks?"
The kid will grow up and have the choice to accept God. God gives us free will, that's how much he loves us. God is against abortion. Overall, God has a plan for anything that isn't in our grasp to understand.
So you concede small children go to heaven? It is disgusting to suggest God is pro-abortion. He created every baby uniquely from the moment of conception. He wants them to have a life. He is strictly against murder, and abortion is murder.
Since I see you're online and not responding did i change ur mind?
Oh i thought u didn't like to forfeit rounds. What a shame you are going against rules you thought were stupid. Dont u want to maximize argument space? smh hypocrit
" If unborn children go to heaven and might go to hell if on Earth, then lets send them to heaven."
I just typed like 5 paragraphs of verses and explanations of people who are incapable of knowing god and babies going to heaven.
"He shows love by burning all his opponents in hell"
He is a just god. People who willfully reject Christ go to hell. Heaven is for the believers and accepter's of god's love. This is off topic btw
Yes Ben Shapiro will go to hell.
And yes, Ben Shapiro is going to hell. He has not accepted Christ as dying on the cross.
However, another point may be helpful in answering this question. While infants and children have neither sensed their personal sin and need for salvation nor placed their faith in Christ, Scripture teaches that condemnation is based on the clear rejection of God's revelation--whether general or specific--not simple ignorance of it (Luke 10:16; John 12:48; 1 Thess. 4:8).
Can we definitely say that the unborn and young children have comprehended the truth displayed by God's general revelation that renders them "without excuse" (Rom. 1:18-20)? They will be judged according to the light they received. Scripture is clear that children and the unborn have original sin--including both the propensity to sin as well as the inherent guilt of original sin. But could it be that somehow Christ's atonement did pay for the guilt for these helpless ones throughout all time? Yes, and therefore it is a credible assumption that a child who dies at an age too young to have made a conscious, willful rejection of Jesus Christ will be taken to be with the Lord.
Second Samuel 12:23 is one of the passages often quoted to imply that babies go to heaven. Though the verse doesn't explicitly say that, David clearly does expect to one day be reunited with his departed child. Since we know David is a believer whose destiny was heaven, we can infer that his hope of reunion means he expected his child to be in heaven. Thus, 2 Samuel 12:23 suggests strong evidence for a heavenly destiny of the unborn and children who die young.
If this were all we had to support our position, it would be admittedly less than stalwart. However, there are other evidences that point us to the same conclusion. First, the Bible clearly teaches that God cares deeply for children. Passages like Matthew 18:1-6 and 19:13-15 affirm the Lord's love for them. Those verses don't state that children go to heaven, but they do show God's heart toward children. He created and cares for children, and beyond that, He always accomplishes His perfect will in every circumstance.
The psalmist reminds us that God is "full of compassion and gracious, longsuffering and abundant in mercy and truth" (Ps. 86:15). He is the God who became flesh that He might carry our sins away by His death on the cross (2 Cor. 5:21). He is the God who will comfort Christians in heaven, for "He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death; nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain" (Rev. 21:4). We can be assured that God will do what is right and loving because He is the standard of rightness and love. Those considerations alone seem to be evidence enough of God's particular, electing love shown to the unborn and those who die young.
Abortion is evil. Killing babies is evil. Murdering is evil.
People who don't know Christ or are too young to understand go to heaven. It says in the Bible.
Wow, even another round of no real evidence! This is too easy.
Great, another round of snoopy's abstract ideas that have no data, statistics, or real significance to back it up. Should have gotten a better opponent smh.
seriously...
lmao
Or maybe Pegasus? DeShawnte? d'Quavion?
Do you live in Atlanta? Maybe your name is D'Shavious or some weird black name
lol i'm just trolling i'm not gay
btw brady is the goat
Your name is James. You live in Atlanta. I've seen you at school. Your pretty sexy.
What's confusing? Your sexy.