The reason for I listed to discared the round one case was that the "patriarchy" or being wealthy doesn't relate to psycology. It says so in the same like that you sai I didn't mention the reason.
Seems like a bad vote, thumbs down.
What I would have pointed out in my round 3 was the absurdity of the idea that if someone claims all men should sit down to pee, that means I must prove that all men must stand, but the voters already know this.
Thank you so much for voting. I actually forfeited the last round because I fell asleep and time ran out, but I was already winning the debate significantly so I wasn't to bummed out about it.
I don't really believe debating is particularly clever in any specific way. It's more of a contest of reason and being persuasive. I would certainly not describe myself as clever in a significant way.
The funny thing is, if you had simply posted a basic response (didn't even need strong arguments), just a basic extension of your Round 1 arguments and a clear indication that everything PRO said was not relelvant, you would have won easily.
If anyone needs votes, tell me
I just realized I can vote now, and I will indeed vote
I was hesitant for fear of getting him in trouble though...
As I was saying, best to report this obviously wrong vote to the propper authorities.
Yeah, read the whole vote. Something doesn't seem right. Im reporting just to be safe.
The reason for I listed to discared the round one case was that the "patriarchy" or being wealthy doesn't relate to psycology. It says so in the same like that you sai I didn't mention the reason.
Seems like a bad vote, thumbs down.
Anyone feel free to vote, if you wish!!!
Fair enough
Are you willing to vote for biological women and psychology as well?
For me it's a clear win for Ben.
Even if arguments are tied, ben wins by far on grammar/spelling and Ben takes conduct because of forfeit
Very good.
Would you be interested in voting again?
This should be smooth sailing for me.
What I would have pointed out in my round 3 was the absurdity of the idea that if someone claims all men should sit down to pee, that means I must prove that all men must stand, but the voters already know this.
Thank you so much for voting. I actually forfeited the last round because I fell asleep and time ran out, but I was already winning the debate significantly so I wasn't to bummed out about it.
Please accept the debate, if you wish
ok.
I will take the CON side in "no man in the United States is taller than 6 foot eight inches".
I really don't understand why people are saying this? What semantics. My resolution was quite clear
Thats good, because as I remember in the last debate, you used very innapropiate slurs to aid your argument. I just wanted to provide some caution.
Thank you for accepting. Game on.
I must caution you, please refrain from using slurs this time. Debate is all about conduct and civility.
Good for you, we can now proceed with debate! Thank you.
I will look forward to your argument.
I don't really believe debating is particularly clever in any specific way. It's more of a contest of reason and being persuasive. I would certainly not describe myself as clever in a significant way.
I'm not sure I understand. In which way do you believe I will troll, specifically? I am simply having a debate.
Somone please accept the debate.
Anyone interested?
I await anyone to kindly accept this debate.
Just vote CON, I forgot about the round 3 argument, and I probably din't need one anyway.
The funny thing is, if you had simply posted a basic response (didn't even need strong arguments), just a basic extension of your Round 1 arguments and a clear indication that everything PRO said was not relelvant, you would have won easily.
PRO absolutely won. He forefits but he still cleary won. Every point CON brought up was irrelevant. I dont even believe this was close.
Actually, better said, proceed with your opening argument.
I have accepted the challenge. I am in need on a debate, please tell me when you are ready to begin