Total posts: 2,240
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Doesn't matter the gender. Both can do the superior act of sexual abstinence.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@John_C_87
"No,the scientific fact is life begins at the female’s creation of egg not theconception of the egg."
Hey if that's the way you look at it, you stay in that box. Life existed before then so it didn't start there.
"You are making an interpretation to justifyone form of murder over another form of murder."
I think you have the wrong interpretation of what I'm saying.
"Sexual abstinence isnot superior in safety to female specific amputation. "
It is in terms of birth control. That's the point I was making.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Yes, Spirit of Christ according to Romans 8 is in those that belong to him. The spirit is the the spirit of God.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Well people can have faith that they will wake up. Even if you're an atheist.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
They don't even have to insist. They just have the faith that's all. You either have it or you don't. You either believe God doesn't exist or you have a lack of belief that God doesn't exist.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
If you don't have the Spirit of Christ, no you shouldn't be copying Jesus because.....well ....you don't have the spirit. You can't do anything on your own and when you don't have that spirit, your none of his.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
21 “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe.
2 “If a thief is caught breaking in at night and is struck a fatal blow, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed;
Of all your getting, get understanding.
Created:
-->
@Mr.BrotherD.Thomas
In the context of this forum topic I believe when I was making the statement about God , whatever it means to that individual I'm interacting with which was surrounding theism.
A theist is believing in a god or THE GOD, whichever they believe, I don't know personally to know which. But whichever they do, they believe in that which is true, not false.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Regardless if what a person believes in is actually true or not because it has not been proven or disproven, the person can believe that it's true . Bottomline.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
"Human life begins at conception and should be treated as such. "
It does not begin at conception. This is the mistake many so called pro life folks make in their position.
"The fetus that presides in the womb of a mother, is in no way part of the mother's body no matter what way you spin it. The fetus in the womb has different DNA,"
How can this be true when half the being's chromosomes are from the mother?
" but a combination of the mothers DNA"
So what you meant to say was different in part.
"There are safer and more productive alternatives to abortion".
Sexual abstinence is superior.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
In the context of this forum topic I believe when I was making the statement about God , whatever it means to that individual I'm interacting with which was surrounding theism.
A theist is believing in a god or THE GOD, whichever they believe, I don't know personally to know which. But whichever they do, they believe in that which is true, not false.
Created:
-->
@Mr.BrotherD.Thomas
Depends on the context from where you quoted if that was a quote of mine but thanks for reading.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Theism is simply the belief in a god or THE God . That's all I'm talking about when I use the term theism.
Theists call those who worship false things, idolize false things pagan.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
You can be both but not in the same perspective.
For example, a Christian is a theist and atheist.
The Christian believes in one religion while having a lack of belief in another.
But if you say you believe in fairy tales, that would make you pagan. If you believe in something you believe is true and not false, you'd be something other.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
How can you be polytheist and an atheist?
Do you mean one at one time and another at another time?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
So you're actually a pagan. Saying that you believe in fairy tales.
You also reject God because there are things you don't understand or makes no sense to you and cannot agree with, is that right?
Created:
Posted in:
Life is not created at conception. You can call it reproduction. Life existed before conception. That's why this term procreation is really just about confusion. Then there's needless controversy over where or when "life starts".
Created:
Posted in:
I've listen to him off and on for years.
I try to have an open mind and learn.
He says "racism" doesn't exist. He says women don't have love, it has to come through the man, etc.
The Muslim religion is evil . Calls COVID the Chinese virus. The very few last non politically correct figures you'll find.
I've talked with him once over the phone.
Created:
Posted in:
Were those democrats in 1928 made up of the Ku Klux Klan?
Created:
Posted in:
Being pro choice for abortion and being against abortion is conflicting.
To those that are asking how much is enough to the population of the planet?
Enough is when mankind has become immortal.
Created:
Posted in:
Trump was such a good POTUS he's running again.
Created:
What was responsible for the conversion?
Created:
Posted in:
You guys can say all you want. You avoid the truth with the avoidance of asking and answering questions.
It's just easier to make statements.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't have my definition for "white power". The point of that debate in connection with the debate "walking, talking, dictionary" was to say words are nothing until the definition is demonstrated.
So that means instead of jumping at the decision that particular words are wrong to say just based on face value, wait for an explanation that potentially adds value to make a decision.
I never gave anything relative to me. It was left open to whoever applies words in the manner they do.
Created:
Posted in:
No point to figure here I guess.
It's what I thought.
Created:
Posted in:
-white power is not wrong
- Atheist are religious
These are true statements I specifically said, alluded to .
Everything else not only have I never said but whether you realize it or not is presumptuous and or is subjected intrepretation. Just because I say prove something, it doesn't mean I stand on the opposite end or believe in the side against the other.
I suggest you actually quote what I've said in context from a segment or paragraph. Don't take intrepretation to translate to what I said.
What I say and what you think I'm saying are two different things. Be verbatim from my own text itself.
Now back to those two other statements, one was used as a debate title, not exact but basic.
With those two statements, would you like for me to explain again how they can be true statements?
Will you accept what I say or dismiss it ?
Created:
Posted in:
I guess no one knows the answers to those questions.
Another question, what have I said that wasn't outright true?
Created:
Posted in:
I do not convince or sell anything. You are to think for yourself. This is what you guys have to learn.
You need to have your own mind and not be persuaded. Refuse the sheeple, conventionalized in a box mindset.
It appears that those of you that think for yourselves ask questions as questions come from thoughts. It shows that you're thinking about what's said upon inquiring specifically about it.
But with just rehearsed, typical talking points perhaps regurgitated by and or from sources, authors, scientists , etc., it shows a limitation of understanding and knowledge or no willingness to add to both of these things.
Still looking for answers to those questions guys. Does anyone know?
You need to have your own mind and not be persuaded. Refuse the sheeple, conventionalized in a box mindset.
It appears that those of you that think for yourselves ask questions as questions come from thoughts. It shows that you're thinking about what's said upon inquiring specifically about it.
But with just rehearsed, typical talking points perhaps regurgitated by and or from sources, authors, scientists , etc., it shows a limitation of understanding and knowledge or no willingness to add to both of these things.
Still looking for answers to those questions guys. Does anyone know?
Created:
Posted in:
Questions, appropriately so,
What do you do when you don't understand something?
What do you do when you continue not to understand something?
Does anyone know what leading questions are and why successful attorneys are able to win cases using this method?
Created:
Posted in:
The "Your proposal to the "race" problem" debate is exactly what it is. It's your proposal, not mine.
The conclusion of the description: If the deductive reasoning is there to stand tenable with your concept , I'll stand to concede that. If I am able to undermine what's said on the basis of invalid points, you can come back to try again in another challenge.
My position is to debunk the proposal. If I can't, my position fails. So that is how it's structured. Many of these statements made from you guys just comes from a lack of understanding .
That's why we're here to clear it all up.
Created:
Posted in:
So the idea is addressed when you fully understand what's being said.
Created:
Posted in:
The reality is definitions do change. You just indicated that based on the latter part of what you said. " Because lexicographers are the standard who listens to people. So whoever said gay means homosexual gradually changed it to the social standard. That’s a better reason why Oromagi may be a walking talking dictionary "
There are times where we have misunderstanding and that is the reality. Only way to clear up confusion is through communication such as what we're doing now.
Notice there's much talking around each other as we're saying a lot of the same things. It just takes some understanding among other things to start to see it.
Created:
Posted in:
Let's have an example of a failure to an argument connection. I don't specifically see where this is being referenced.
I don't use sources for the majority of the debates other than common sense and universal law.
I do however may use a generic source such as the Google search engine. For example, the incestous and same sex marriage debate, I made a reference there.
I typically get topics that don't warrant much if it all any research. You do have to think according to real life truisms while intermittently applying hypothetical situations.
I don't know what's meant by "no structure". It comes down to whether or not you understand what you're reading. If you don't, I remind you over and over to speak up and ask for clarity. Recommended to do prior to debating. You should debate with pure understanding first.
Created:
Posted in:
So if you could translate everything said into questions, what would they be?
Problems are solved via the system of questions and answers, i.e. doctor visit , auto mechanic service.
Created:
Posted in:
Questions, pointers, tips, proposals , I'm all "ears", all eyes really.
Created:
Posted in:
Well you guys, this is why I came up with those "trial " debates.
You guys obviously have questions for me and see some problems.
I don't know if either of you participated in the "trial" debate challenges.
Does anyone wish to honestly get an answer from me to vet or would you rather just settle in the satisfaction of what you think of someone?
Created: