Total posts: 167
Posted in:
Anyone who doesn't believe women are different from men has never met one.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Yeah, not all of it but some. Wanted to know what it was like and thought it would be neat to reference on this Q&A.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Here are some more questions...
- How sentimental are you?
- What would your ideal woman look/be like?
- What is the ideal debate for you?
- How did you develop your political beliefs?
- What, specifically, does "Orthodox" indicate about your religion on your profile?
- Who, on this site, believes the most like you? Who believes the most opposite of you?
- Why are you what you are?
The last one's a bit interpretive, I guess.
Don't have to answer them all.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Cool. But I was hoping you'd recognize where it's from...
Remember this?
Question and Answer
Q: What’s your name?
A: I don’t go by a name
Q: Where are you from?
A: From the planet Earth
Q: What makes you special?
A: I am not like everyone elseQ: Favorite pastime?
A: Being creative
Q: What are your reactions to the beef going on right now in the…?
A: I wanna stop you right there
Why are you questioning me on the irrelevant things in life
Why don’t you ask me things
That will impact our society
Why is there still racism?
Why is there still homophobia?
Why is there still bigots?
Why is there school shooters?
Why can’t we cure the diseases?
Why do we see Lil Tay buy foreign cars while homeless people struggle for food every day?
Why do our social media influencer make fun of
Suicide, gun violence, mental disabilities, deadly diseases
Rape, school shootings, DUIs, Weed
They seem to avoid all the important topics
So they can mask what’s going on in the world
Dying people
An unstable growing population
A country with heavy tensions
Heavy hearts, cold hearts
People without soules
People who die for their country
People who die for their religion
People who die for their belief
But we mask it over some rainbow dude
Who just made money by racketing
Dropping music and making millions
Endorsing crime and doing nothing beneficial with his money
Every bad story gets highlighted
Every negative study gets published
But humans do nothing about it
We let it all happen
We all want change
But we don’t change
So ask me a relevant question
And stop masking the truth
Question that…
It's from your poetry!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I feel like this is relevant.
Q: What makes you special?
Q: Favorite pastime?
Q: What are your reactions to the beef going on right now in the…?
Q: What’s your name?
Q: Where are you from?Q: What makes you special?
Q: Favorite pastime?
Q: What are your reactions to the beef going on right now in the…?
Created:
Posted in:
And you know, it doesn't have polls or opinions either. That would be a little bit cool to be back. A little bit at least, I'd imagine.
Created:
Posted in:
That reminds me how odd I thought is was this site didn't include a "The Big Issues" section like the old one did. I think it would be very cool for this site to tell you how much you agree/disagree with someone right away. Why doesn't this site have it?
Created:
Posted in:
Does Mike have a second account? Because it seems strange to me that his account is on here. His account somewhat represents the site itself, and helps people with it and created it, but doesn't really use it and the site's actual contents.
He might've used it some, maybe, but not much.
If we're going to make a hall of fame for this site, we ought to only include people who accomplished something or became worthy within and through this site. They used this site to win and become a historical and famous member or user, rather than have created code which happens to be greatly associated with this site.
These people might be people with high numbers of debates or win-to-loss ratios, or people who have proven to be a pretty cool guy within the forum or even debate comments. Stuff like that.
Plus this is a yearly event. It should have new winners and change things up each year, depending on one's contributions and current personality during that year. Not for praising the creator or even a scenario where someone who people wanted to win one year but didn't was voted in the next, even though he became inactive after that first year. That just wouldn't make sense.
Now maybe we could make a special section for the creator, moderators, and other people people like for having made special contributions to this site, but we ought not to place these people in the hall of fame.
And I'm not saying we need to remove Mike--the vote is final, I just find it odd that people seemed to have voted so.
Created:
Posted in:
People
RationalMadman
Reason
Yes, I know, he's the perfect embodiment of the gamma, as relating to Vox Day's Socio-Sexual Hierarchy (but ideally with my modifications/perception of it). So I know why people don't like him; it's intrinsic.
Awesome. He's intrinsically, 100%, a gamma that you'll love or hate, or even feel many ambivalent feelings toward.
But he's awesome still, and his awesomeness lives inside of his gammatude.
He's Mad. He's all Man. And he lives to be Rational.Awesome. He's intrinsically, 100%, a gamma that you'll love or hate, or even feel many ambivalent feelings toward.
You may understand and sympathize with him, his thoughts, and his beliefs, ...or merely see him from some certain practical mindset as someone who himself is irrational.
He believes what he believes, loves rap, and delves into many mad theories of which he believes are only logical, even if many would see them as highly impractical and, of course, unlikely. Many people might relate to much of this, and they might, too, delve a bit or believe similarly to him, but they are likely to at least consider some practical side, one that seemingly contradicts with RM's rational side, or they might even accidentally think in such a practical mindset or with non-nihilistic, empiricistic, and non-skeptical thought processes, yet RationalMadman does not do that; with all he deems irrational and, of course, does not believe in, he nearly seems to refuse to so merely see the world from such a view or even consider it to be a comprehensible viewpoint, --more than most all others. He thinks only one way, his way, the way he sees as only rational.
His mind and thoughts are completely and fully his, even if thought before or unwittingly relating to the environment. He is independent and doesn't openly let his thoughts or actions be affected by others. He retraces all of his thoughts to core truths and believes in nothing he cannot understand. He believes the universe and reality is completely logical, --there is one possibility. He believes his mind could compute anything everything, for something could only exist if he is able to comprehend it. He is always right. Never wrong. If he is so-called "wrong", it's not his own folly, for he (madly, he is) is himself nothing but a user and partaker of logic itself, and anything that he states is rooted in the only-rational logic behind the belief, which is true and logical, and even if the most likely expectation does not come to pass, it was still the most likely expectation.
Now I may be assuming a bit about his belief patterns, but I can tell by his personality that he is at least this type of a person.
And I can, based mostly on his personality, give a lot of evidence for why I think of him as being such a person or thinker or for being a gamma.
One piece of evidence I would like to point out is that he feels somewhat compelled to debate anything and everything and have an inherent, instant view on it all, whether he's experienced in it or not. He's a rationalist, no doubt that he's at least inclined to think that way, and he nearly lets himself think nothing but logic. He seems to think that he ought to be able to figure out the hard-core chances of reality being one way or the other based on only the question and, as a logical premise, whatever (if anything) he does know, and that if he can do that, the evidence and where he ought to look next for it should follow without a surprise; his logic ought to have accounted for such a chance of it, and why ought he expect surprises? He believes he could do anything as well as anyone else could do. He ought to be able to solve any problem.
Also note that I am not philosophizing or anything. I am just trying to convey a characteristic or way of thinking I think may be commonly found within many people to a certain extent.
I find him to be a perfectly good representative for this site. And I spent too long writing this for some reason so even if its dumb I'll see how it goes.
[I am skipping debates; didn't read them all]
Threads
I like the Vending Machine one the best, but I put the other two in just to get the HOFs out of here.
Why are the two HOFs even on here? And DebateArt.com as a user?
If the Hall of Fame's gives you itself, it's a bad hall of fame. And if the Hall of Fame represents the site, and the site's best content is a self post (that's not even that exciting), then it's a bad site. And we all know that's not the case. So why are they even on here?
And DebateArt.com was great to make the site, but he hasn't participated much within the site! He's definitely a special person as the creator, and is recognized for that, but he's not really a user, and shouldn't be in the hall of fame.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
You have to actively participate on this site to vote?
I come here and read now and then but obviously haven't done much.
Created:
Posted in:
Btw at first I read that as "I'm kind of black."
I thought it was you coming out and presenting your race to everybody!
Created:
Posted in:
It's terrible.
I would agree with RationalMadman, you don't learn a thing in school, you might as well educate yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
The Real Slim Shady is always my #1!!!
Created: