LogicalLarry

Firstly, Pro's style and inherent colloquialism makes a clean reading of his syllogism much more difficult to their obvious disadvantage. However, this is unrelated to the argument and is simply a thought for the Pro to consider in future debates.
Con consistently provided sound rebuttals and standard (yet sound) arguments to defend their position. Future recommendations to the Pro would include wording thoughts such that they provide a clear and understandable logical progression. This would also help mitigate some of the stray fallacies not addressed but apparent in their reasoning.