Intelligence_06

Within the commandments of the Old Testament, one states that Remember the Sabbath day, and Not do Any work on said day. However, if work on Sunday can literally save lives, then should he do said work? More than that, if said work is to just save lives, does it count as work, and are you allowed to do it on Sunday?

Opinions.

yes.

Please answer if you are interested. 

Warning: Nothing below can be considered a major judgement to anyone's quality of debating. Separation of the logics and the exercise.

You guys can post anything below as long as you are honest. If you tell me that you are a 10'9 strongman that can lift poles like pencils, sorry, NO.

I will try my best to respect everyone.

I want to see what everyone thinks of it.

What was the last lead change? more than half of a year ago?

Oromagi is flawlessly winning. Especially since Oromagi is literally 150 points over everyone else, On the contrary, Everyone below 8th place is less than 150 points above the average debater. So what that means is Oro is as far away above the lower top 10 as the lower top 10 is to a normal person(1500).

Oromagi won 80 debates in his DArt career, so one in the most-case scenario, has to win at least 80 debates WITH NO LOSSES in order to get that medal at this point. It is damn near impossible and for the average DArt user, a 10-streak of winning is already good enough, let alone 80.

At this point, getting that medal is near impossible and with a near-impossible challenge no one will be even moltivated to get that. This is equivalent to making me beat Bsh1 on DDO at its golden age.

This thread is not meant to target Oromagi in any way. This is questioning the practicality of an achievement that is almost impossible. 

Anyone agrees and/or disagrees? And, oh, please, no insults for I will report to the mods. Warning here.

I think the claim above is true.

Conflict=loss. Less conflicts=less losses. The closest we can come to a utopia is if there is as little conflicts as possibly can.

The term "religion" and "politics" implies that there are separate sides, and even if it is a one-party authoritarian dictatorship, there will still be people that will NOT believe in it, unless the term is utilized so extremely that there is NO other known method of government. In this case, the word "politics" would not even need exist because it is completely integrated within the society and it cannot be separated from within. No opposition could rise in such a government in which the term "politics" would cease to have any practical meaning. Kim Jong Un of North Korea has done a very good job operating like this, except he is horrible at doing what he is supposed to do. The people knows no other good, and this state can ideologically run as its own planet outside of any intervention of anything else: Self-sufficient(What is ironic is that lots of money have gone to censorship).

Religion too. Religion is opposite to "irreligion", meaning that there is possible opposition towards this belief. If one belief is completely integrated into the society and everyone is happy, there should be no other religion/irreligion(vice versa for a completely atheist state, no religion). 

The best possible society is a self-sufficient, jubilant, conflict-less society. One party rules and one belief is penetrated extremely deeply into every existing population's minds. There is only one side, and that would mean that there is practiacally no defined religion or politics. 

I remember John Lennon singing a song about this, but I don't remember the name. You guys can tell me the name in the next posts.

First.

Yes.

How u feel like scrolling?

I am libleft to centrist. what about you guys?

I wanna ask this because the max and min on DDO was 9000, 1000.

Yes.

So essentially, I have decided on a spectrum to represent debaters

I will go first. I am lean-right.

It is never used. WHY?

You read that correctly, this is not a forum topic.