I always felt like it is a lie that alcohol makes you dumb and reckless. It enhances your creativity and social skills and makes you more in touch with your emotions.
The only difference between my vote and the others is that I didn't go round for round. Referring to my "chakras" was just another way of saying I had a better feeling when listening to Mharman's picks.
You deleted my vote because you're a corrupt mod with anti-favoritism towards me and not because of the vote itself.
The debate is about "greatest Hokage" and you can interpret that multiple ways. Hokage is a position similar to "mayor" or "president". You can look at it in a very broad general sense, or you can look at it in terms of what makes someone a better "mayor" specifically. Would you say that Teddy Roosevelt was the best president just because he was the most bad ass? Probably not, but maybe he was the greatest when you combine other factors. At the same time some nerdy, scrawny president would arguably be better because he was the smartest decision maker and making decisions is what the job is about.
If you pretend not to see the logic here, it's because you want me to lose and not because of the validity of the point itself.
I'm saying that if you combine everything Hashirama is the greatest Hokage but if you only include stuff that helps you lead a village and not stuff that helps you fight or be respectable in general, then Shikamaru and Minato are the best a Hokages.
Either way you don't have to vote Con even if it turns out Naruto is better than Hashirama, and if you do it can only mean that you hate me and want me to kill myself.
No, even if Naruto is greater than Hashirama con loses because Naruto is an inferior leader to every other Hokage. Naruto and Hashirama are actually the least intelligent Hokage and every other Hokage is a better decision maker. Think about it, would you choose someone to be a political leader based on how strong a fighter they are or how intelligent and politically-minded they are? Minato is the greatest Hokage if Hashirama isn't because Minato is as intelligent as Shikamaru and stronger than the other Hokage besides Naruto and Hashirama.
An average woman is already attractive to most men. Women don't care if you're in really good shape if you're short and ugly.
Muscles are over rated in men, there are genuinely women who prefer normal or even super skinny bodies. There are no or at least very few women who like fat men but there are tons of men who like fat women.
All women are attracted to tall men and handsome men, assuming they're attracted to men at all.
God damn you're stupid. Any average woman can sell her body but only Chads can have the same success as average women do. A 5/10 woman is hot to the average man but only 8-10 men are hot to the average woman.
If I lose it's only because of unwarranted dick riding like this. Giving someone points for arguments for not making an argument is utterly ironic given that it would never happen in any other debate. Not posting an argument isn't a conduct issue, it is the total lack of an argument and that is the real issue. If someone were to come back after forfeiting and annihilate their opponent they shouldn't lose points because forfeiting was rude or whatever, however if they don't compensate it's their loss for not making arguments or making weak ones.
I used to be an alcoholic and it didn't help me with shit. I was still depressed and bored with life and in the long term it would have molested my butt hole and killed me.
The reason this debate is stupid is because of the false dichotomy at play. In reality, some trans women are the female gender and some are not whereas none are the female sex. What makes someone's gender female is not identifying as female but having a female-wired brain. Men and women's brains are wired differently and that is what makes gender different from sex. There are gay men and femboys who think more like a woman than most trans women but still identify as male. Gender should be seen as a spectrum based on how your thoughts and feelings manifest as more feminine or more masculine rather than something you can simply choose to identify with. Also, gender is binary whereas sex is infinite and most people get that backwards. There is "hard" and "soft" and "rigid" and "flexible" etc. These kinds of yin-yang dualities are what make up "feminine" or "masculine" traits. On the other hand, there could theoretically be aliens that have 8 different types of chromosomes and 11 different kinds of genitalia required to reproduce but they would all still be able to be described as fem or masc psychologically.
Only multiple criteria is used for rated debates. I'm not arguing for removal of multiple criteria, just for removal of the conduct part specifically or perhaps that it should be changed to mean something else. I don't think being rude to your opponent discredits your arguments and I think it's silly that someone can technically lose a debate because they were mean.
So you're saying Con can be exempt from rules that disallow encouragement of self harm/suicide as long as I consent? Good because I was worried no one would accept due to it violating rules.
I need someone to convince me to kill myself because I basically know I should but I just kind of need that final push to get me over that edge you know? Like a lot of people have encouraged suicide but when I ask them to legitimately convince me their attempts are always either lazy or they chicken out.
Morality is obviously based on whatever God says. That's why slavery, rape, genocide and stoning gays is good and having sex without doing a magic ritual (marriage) first or smoking weed is evil.
It's not that all are indoctrinated, some are really just so stupid that they believe it on their own. ALL of them are stupid however, even the smart ones. Being a human calculator isn't the same thing as being generally intelligent/wise so even someone like Isaac Newton was just an idiot who was good at math.
Your vote is stupid because is it really much better if I murder you if you live a comfortable life first? Your viewpoint is skewed because we're talking about animals but if you think of it as humans and realize you are biased towards humans it makes sense why your vote makes no sense.
Black pill is the foundation of the correctness of the other pills making it most correct. The other pills only count if you qualify enough based on black pill and matter less if you are super well off in a black pill way.
You didn't defend the carnivore diet being better than a plant based diet to any extent whatsoever and he willfully ignored you shifting the goalpost. I deserve to win this debate because I provided any argument whatsoever for a plant based diet. You attacked plant based diets and provided arguments for including meat in your diet and I repeat: didn't argue for the carnivore diet at all.
It was as if the debate proposition changed to vegan VS omnivore in his mind just as you intended and I warned the voters about but he willfully ignored it because he would rather suck your cock than mine. That is literally what it comes down to.
In other words you are willfully drinking Con's coolaid knowing it is coolaid because you like his debating style and sources better. Still makes you a shitty voter. He didn't even try to meet his BOP and is clearly intellectually dishonest and shifting the goal post like super hard.
I'm surprised you didn't notice how Con didn't even attempt to meet his BOP and shifted the goalpost throughout the entire debate from him needing to support a carnivore diet to meet his BOP to him simply promoting including meat in your diet. Like he didn't address a carnivore diet AT ALL, just including meat in general.
I'm going to rip out your toenail and make you use it as a shovel to dig for water while stranded in the desert.
" the pain of a 1 inch penis is infinite for the one who wields it."
Best quote of the debate so far XD
I always felt like it is a lie that alcohol makes you dumb and reckless. It enhances your creativity and social skills and makes you more in touch with your emotions.
This shit is hilarious.
YOUR POINTS ARE NEGATED BY THE FACT THAT YOU KEEP SPELLING "GENIUS" AS "GENIOUS"
You targeted me only as a declaration of war.
The only difference between my vote and the others is that I didn't go round for round. Referring to my "chakras" was just another way of saying I had a better feeling when listening to Mharman's picks.
You deleted my vote because you're a corrupt mod with anti-favoritism towards me and not because of the vote itself.
My chakras never lie.
The votes are full of people just stating their opinions with no basis, because this is a subjective topic.
My favorie ways of knowing the truth are via rational evidence and empirical reasoning.
The debate is about "greatest Hokage" and you can interpret that multiple ways. Hokage is a position similar to "mayor" or "president". You can look at it in a very broad general sense, or you can look at it in terms of what makes someone a better "mayor" specifically. Would you say that Teddy Roosevelt was the best president just because he was the most bad ass? Probably not, but maybe he was the greatest when you combine other factors. At the same time some nerdy, scrawny president would arguably be better because he was the smartest decision maker and making decisions is what the job is about.
If you pretend not to see the logic here, it's because you want me to lose and not because of the validity of the point itself.
I'm saying that if you combine everything Hashirama is the greatest Hokage but if you only include stuff that helps you lead a village and not stuff that helps you fight or be respectable in general, then Shikamaru and Minato are the best a Hokages.
Either way you don't have to vote Con even if it turns out Naruto is better than Hashirama, and if you do it can only mean that you hate me and want me to kill myself.
The fact remains that there is an alternate way to interpret what "greatest Hokage" is even if I didn't think about and use it enough in the debate.
No, even if Naruto is greater than Hashirama con loses because Naruto is an inferior leader to every other Hokage. Naruto and Hashirama are actually the least intelligent Hokage and every other Hokage is a better decision maker. Think about it, would you choose someone to be a political leader based on how strong a fighter they are or how intelligent and politically-minded they are? Minato is the greatest Hokage if Hashirama isn't because Minato is as intelligent as Shikamaru and stronger than the other Hokage besides Naruto and Hashirama.
Yes, everything seems fine.
An average woman is already attractive to most men. Women don't care if you're in really good shape if you're short and ugly.
Muscles are over rated in men, there are genuinely women who prefer normal or even super skinny bodies. There are no or at least very few women who like fat men but there are tons of men who like fat women.
All women are attracted to tall men and handsome men, assuming they're attracted to men at all.
Imagine if he took an L while sitting like L and smoking an L while getting smoked like an L.
I hope you can see on your own why that is retarded but I'll elaborate in round 2.
God damn you're stupid. Any average woman can sell her body but only Chads can have the same success as average women do. A 5/10 woman is hot to the average man but only 8-10 men are hot to the average woman.
If I lose it's only because of unwarranted dick riding like this. Giving someone points for arguments for not making an argument is utterly ironic given that it would never happen in any other debate. Not posting an argument isn't a conduct issue, it is the total lack of an argument and that is the real issue. If someone were to come back after forfeiting and annihilate their opponent they shouldn't lose points because forfeiting was rude or whatever, however if they don't compensate it's their loss for not making arguments or making weak ones.
He thinks he's being clever by throwing a round but all that does is give you less of a chance to argue.
BIG FAT SWEATY BUTTOCKS
It almost sounds like you're trying to encourage me to self harm. You are suggesting drinking alcohol and not eating/drinking properly.
I used to be an alcoholic and it didn't help me with shit. I was still depressed and bored with life and in the long term it would have molested my butt hole and killed me.
The reason this debate is stupid is because of the false dichotomy at play. In reality, some trans women are the female gender and some are not whereas none are the female sex. What makes someone's gender female is not identifying as female but having a female-wired brain. Men and women's brains are wired differently and that is what makes gender different from sex. There are gay men and femboys who think more like a woman than most trans women but still identify as male. Gender should be seen as a spectrum based on how your thoughts and feelings manifest as more feminine or more masculine rather than something you can simply choose to identify with. Also, gender is binary whereas sex is infinite and most people get that backwards. There is "hard" and "soft" and "rigid" and "flexible" etc. These kinds of yin-yang dualities are what make up "feminine" or "masculine" traits. On the other hand, there could theoretically be aliens that have 8 different types of chromosomes and 11 different kinds of genitalia required to reproduce but they would all still be able to be described as fem or masc psychologically.
Only multiple criteria is used for rated debates. I'm not arguing for removal of multiple criteria, just for removal of the conduct part specifically or perhaps that it should be changed to mean something else. I don't think being rude to your opponent discredits your arguments and I think it's silly that someone can technically lose a debate because they were mean.
So you're saying Con can be exempt from rules that disallow encouragement of self harm/suicide as long as I consent? Good because I was worried no one would accept due to it violating rules.
I need someone to convince me to kill myself because I basically know I should but I just kind of need that final push to get me over that edge you know? Like a lot of people have encouraged suicide but when I ask them to legitimately convince me their attempts are always either lazy or they chicken out.
Morality is obviously based on whatever God says. That's why slavery, rape, genocide and stoning gays is good and having sex without doing a magic ritual (marriage) first or smoking weed is evil.
It's not that all are indoctrinated, some are really just so stupid that they believe it on their own. ALL of them are stupid however, even the smart ones. Being a human calculator isn't the same thing as being generally intelligent/wise so even someone like Isaac Newton was just an idiot who was good at math.
Yes
Make a rated one and I will accept.
Make it rated pussy
Abortion should only be legal when it reduces the number of stupid genes that get to reproduce.
If it was rated I would accept in support of Methodism.
Suck my potato sack nigga.
Dumb and mentally ill are not mutually exclusive retard. I am both for your information.
I challenge you to a rap battle but you have to filter your raps through 6 different languages on google translate and still make them rhyme
Handle your own beef pussy.
fuck you
fuck you
Fuck you
Your vote is stupid because is it really much better if I murder you if you live a comfortable life first? Your viewpoint is skewed because we're talking about animals but if you think of it as humans and realize you are biased towards humans it makes sense why your vote makes no sense.
Black pill is the foundation of the correctness of the other pills making it most correct. The other pills only count if you qualify enough based on black pill and matter less if you are super well off in a black pill way.
Black pill: dating success is mostly genetics
Red pill: Dating success is mostly effort
Blue pill: Dating success is mostly individual preference and finding the right person for you
It's a rap battle that prioritizes rhyming
Throughout the entire debate you argued for including meat in your diet, not for an actual carnivore diet.
You didn't defend the carnivore diet being better than a plant based diet to any extent whatsoever and he willfully ignored you shifting the goalpost. I deserve to win this debate because I provided any argument whatsoever for a plant based diet. You attacked plant based diets and provided arguments for including meat in your diet and I repeat: didn't argue for the carnivore diet at all.
It was as if the debate proposition changed to vegan VS omnivore in his mind just as you intended and I warned the voters about but he willfully ignored it because he would rather suck your cock than mine. That is literally what it comes down to.
I met my side of the BOP almost infinitely more than he met his. Why don't you go back in the closet and continue sucking Lancelot's cock.
In other words you are willfully drinking Con's coolaid knowing it is coolaid because you like his debating style and sources better. Still makes you a shitty voter. He didn't even try to meet his BOP and is clearly intellectually dishonest and shifting the goal post like super hard.
I'm surprised you didn't notice how Con didn't even attempt to meet his BOP and shifted the goalpost throughout the entire debate from him needing to support a carnivore diet to meet his BOP to him simply promoting including meat in your diet. Like he didn't address a carnivore diet AT ALL, just including meat in general.
You are a poop holer