Thank you for your kind words, however I can't take credit. Anything I say on this site that's true was Christ in me. Anything else is simply the shortcomings of my limited human mind. Thank you for reading
Also, two last things, DM Murdoch was anything but a scholar. Her publications couldn't even get into reputable journals which is why Atlantis press had to pick her up. Also, since you didn't tie us on conduct please let me know where I could get improved
Actually killshot, the Josephus reference I cited was NOT the one suspected of interpolation, there are two Jesus reference in antiquities, and the one I cited was not an interpolation. I cited that one specifically to avoid that issue.
Are you arguing for or against objective morality? I am in favor of objective morality (there is absolute right and absolute wrong) but I wasn't sure if you are in favor of this as well, since I saw you debating moral particularism
Thank you speedrace, my opponent is quite formidable indeed. I don't often hear new arguments against God's existence and this one was pretty new to me. Thank you for reading
Actually, after reviewing the whole debate, would you be interested, Wrick it Ralph, in the same debate but between us? So long as we can keep the 30,000 character limit. This one might get lengthy
I like it!
Burden of diss??? ROFL
Thank you for your kind words, however I can't take credit. Anything I say on this site that's true was Christ in me. Anything else is simply the shortcomings of my limited human mind. Thank you for reading
Thank you very much for your kind words. I really enjoy debating you, I look forward to many more
Also, two last things, DM Murdoch was anything but a scholar. Her publications couldn't even get into reputable journals which is why Atlantis press had to pick her up. Also, since you didn't tie us on conduct please let me know where I could get improved
Actually killshot, the Josephus reference I cited was NOT the one suspected of interpolation, there are two Jesus reference in antiquities, and the one I cited was not an interpolation. I cited that one specifically to avoid that issue.
Are you arguing for or against objective morality? I am in favor of objective morality (there is absolute right and absolute wrong) but I wasn't sure if you are in favor of this as well, since I saw you debating moral particularism
Cool I'll mix mine up too
Sorry I don't know why that posted seven times.... Ok cool
Am I barred from accepting this since we are debating this currently? If so I completely understand.
Thank you speedrace, my opponent is quite formidable indeed. I don't often hear new arguments against God's existence and this one was pretty new to me. Thank you for reading
Ok, so, if you could just give me a brief run down on the debate format, maybe explain what exactly you want in each round
Ten thousand characters? I'm in trouble
Actually, after reviewing the whole debate, would you be interested, Wrick it Ralph, in the same debate but between us? So long as we can keep the 30,000 character limit. This one might get lengthy
I would interested in a debate about your first premise, regarding the meta-physical. Would you?
I think your judgment was good. Thank you speedrace
Historical