Total debates: 7
The purpose of this debate is for Pro to establish that there is enough credible evidence to question the current theory of the origins and purpose of the Great Sphinx and The Great Pyramid of Giza. Con must demonstrate compelling evidence to support the current belief system. It is the accepted system so compelling should be easy. So both parties have to build a case.
I will be arguing as Pro. Please make sure and read my new and evolving terms and conditions (advisories) before accepting the debate. I am no longer accepting what i consider "dishonest debate, or narrow scoped and one sdied debate".
My opponent, whether he be a chemtrailer, or a contrailer, is going to argue in favour of the contemporary understanding of his/her belief
As humans, I contend it is impossible for there to be an absolute ban on the experimentation on/of animals as we progress The contender shall demonstrate that, through the balance of probabilities, banning of animal experimentation shall not impair our progress.
My opponent is going to argue against this conspiracy theory. Though i am going to argue, not only is it not a conspiracy theory, but also for what it says on the tin.
Vaccines and autism are always at battle with vaccines appearing to come out on top. So I am going to take the other side and see from a more focused perspective. Has the DTaP vaccine been exonerated as a cause of autism when given to children under 6 months?
Does a good, perfect person struggle with evil? I will define "perfection" within the scope of this debate. It is: living a perfect life is living a life without error of any kind under any circumstance. It is always making correct choices when faced with every circumstance. Impossible to achieve? Probably. But, if even a perfect person by this definition still struggles with evil, is there any doubt that the rest of us do?