Alright, so you are just admitting that you state your argument as sound, because it, well, that's how you feel. I'm sorry to offend you by telling you that everybody can use the powers of ten, and then saying that it's called metric. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. What? All we can do is say ok, rather than getting a pat on the back. Also, about the quote, you said that "I am American myself, but I'm not a fool." states that you are smarter than the "average American". Also, I have re-read your comment, you stated that "Also, you didn't cite any sources either, you just showed up quotes, but you didn't actually send the links to where they came from, which to my understanding is usually required to get source points.", I can list them if you want me to, but I've already did, so you can stop beating around the bush. "Aha! Just move the decimal one point and we can call it metric, so we can become original, even though we're taking unnecessary steps to an already simplified measurement."
*Imperial vs Metric: https://dailycalculators.com/The-metric-system-vs-Imperial-system
*Why the U.S doesn't use metric: https://www.britannica.com/story/why-doesnt-the-us-use-the-metric-system#:~:text=So%20why%20hasn't%20it,American%20jobs%20and%20consumer%20products.
*Why the economy would fail without Imperial, and the difference between metric: https://www.masterclass.com/articles/whats-the-difference-between-the-metric-and-imperial-system-plus-a-conversion-chart-for-imperial-and-metric-systems-of-measurement
Don't act all high and mighty now, and I never misquoted you, go take that disrespect crap somewhere else, because if you want to ruin the economy, go ahead, it's America's pleasure. If you have to have to convert a distance to metric, just say that you have a "pet peeve" and you truly just don't care about anybody else's opinions. Metric is worse, mainly because moving a decimal, aka, using an unnecessary step to convert a number by doing simple exponential factors, and calling imperial useless, makes me feel you just learnt what scientific notation meant. What's worse, is even if it might be "superior", it can't be used in every situation, so it's not irrelevant. Look, I came here to debate too, and if you think winning you do anything, I'm sorry, but this is casual, not ranked. "America could have been calibrated on any system, not just the Imperial System, and it would make it hard to convert to metric." you clearly waited to say this, which I was waiting for you to confess. You have a personal bias with metric, but you refused to give any resources that told me that it was better than imperial, but instead your source was "it's easy!". That's why I'm upset, because I could of had a good argument, but you sounded smart even though you had nothing to back it up. Of course, you can just round it up, but just moving a decimal? Come on now? Imperial is better because metric is purely based on this, just to multiply 10^x to call yourself smart? Listen to yourself. "Though some people would still like to stick to their imperial system, they don't have any good reason as to why. They've simply been using it all their life, and their intuition is calibrated upon it. But that says nothing about the actual logical and mathematical integrity of their system, it just means they grew up with it. And some people simply apply their love of the imperial system to patriotism, and say that it is the American way. I am American myself, but I'm not a fool. I can clearly see that the metric system is better, and people who just say "U.S.A.! U.S.A.!" as an argument are setting themselves up for failure, and are grasping at colloquial phrases to make their point sound more sound. It's not." This is my example, ad hominem, bandwagon, and absolutely sneaky use of sesquipedalian loquaciousness trying to tell people not to use the sesquipedalian loquaciousness fallacy.
I know, but how the heck are you supposed to win this??? I ain't no troll, I want to debate too but I'm forced to debate casual. I like trolling but I like helping boost others ego as well since I don't want one.
Also, to further mention, I only posted that because I wanted me and a stranger to have access to ranked arguments, there is no real debates within casual, it's just makes no difference what so ever.
First of all, I'm am not a troll. This website is dead as a fly that was hit multiple times by a flyswatter. Also, if it wouldn't of been for me accepting this, this would have been forgotten, besides, I actually found evidence, but still, it's a lose-lose argument. "Whether the metric or imperial system is better depends on various factors1. The metric system offers advantages in terms of standardization and global consistency, while the Imperial system retains significance in certain contexts and cultures. For specific applications, such as drill bits, metric or imperial may be preferred based on hole size."
Here's the thing, this format that you are using is so demanding, that I have to be here online so much to the point where I accidentally forfeit because I have work to take care of, please try making it longer, because in a online debate, it takes hours to construct a paragraph that truly makes sense, not only that, but you have a terrible parameter, 1,000 words?! That's enough letters to create a claim, but it removes the cons ability to counterargue/claim, and come with their own reasoning, especially with two rounds.
nah you got it bro, I aint going to bother using this website anymore cuz i actually see that people want to debate on here. mb
Alright. That is useless information.
Yeah, I was playing devil's advocate, but he and Casey can't stop shut their traps so I wrote it down here.
I'm done with this argument, I gave you facts and you simply ignored them.
Alright, so you are just admitting that you state your argument as sound, because it, well, that's how you feel. I'm sorry to offend you by telling you that everybody can use the powers of ten, and then saying that it's called metric. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. What? All we can do is say ok, rather than getting a pat on the back. Also, about the quote, you said that "I am American myself, but I'm not a fool." states that you are smarter than the "average American". Also, I have re-read your comment, you stated that "Also, you didn't cite any sources either, you just showed up quotes, but you didn't actually send the links to where they came from, which to my understanding is usually required to get source points.", I can list them if you want me to, but I've already did, so you can stop beating around the bush. "Aha! Just move the decimal one point and we can call it metric, so we can become original, even though we're taking unnecessary steps to an already simplified measurement."
*Imperial vs Metric: https://dailycalculators.com/The-metric-system-vs-Imperial-system
*Why the U.S doesn't use metric: https://www.britannica.com/story/why-doesnt-the-us-use-the-metric-system#:~:text=So%20why%20hasn't%20it,American%20jobs%20and%20consumer%20products.
*Why the economy would fail without Imperial, and the difference between metric: https://www.masterclass.com/articles/whats-the-difference-between-the-metric-and-imperial-system-plus-a-conversion-chart-for-imperial-and-metric-systems-of-measurement
Don't act all high and mighty now, and I never misquoted you, go take that disrespect crap somewhere else, because if you want to ruin the economy, go ahead, it's America's pleasure. If you have to have to convert a distance to metric, just say that you have a "pet peeve" and you truly just don't care about anybody else's opinions. Metric is worse, mainly because moving a decimal, aka, using an unnecessary step to convert a number by doing simple exponential factors, and calling imperial useless, makes me feel you just learnt what scientific notation meant. What's worse, is even if it might be "superior", it can't be used in every situation, so it's not irrelevant. Look, I came here to debate too, and if you think winning you do anything, I'm sorry, but this is casual, not ranked. "America could have been calibrated on any system, not just the Imperial System, and it would make it hard to convert to metric." you clearly waited to say this, which I was waiting for you to confess. You have a personal bias with metric, but you refused to give any resources that told me that it was better than imperial, but instead your source was "it's easy!". That's why I'm upset, because I could of had a good argument, but you sounded smart even though you had nothing to back it up. Of course, you can just round it up, but just moving a decimal? Come on now? Imperial is better because metric is purely based on this, just to multiply 10^x to call yourself smart? Listen to yourself. "Though some people would still like to stick to their imperial system, they don't have any good reason as to why. They've simply been using it all their life, and their intuition is calibrated upon it. But that says nothing about the actual logical and mathematical integrity of their system, it just means they grew up with it. And some people simply apply their love of the imperial system to patriotism, and say that it is the American way. I am American myself, but I'm not a fool. I can clearly see that the metric system is better, and people who just say "U.S.A.! U.S.A.!" as an argument are setting themselves up for failure, and are grasping at colloquial phrases to make their point sound more sound. It's not." This is my example, ad hominem, bandwagon, and absolutely sneaky use of sesquipedalian loquaciousness trying to tell people not to use the sesquipedalian loquaciousness fallacy.
and dawg, didn't you say that autism is a disease??? You plan on doin something with this debate but I havent seen you said crap.
I know, but how the heck are you supposed to win this??? I ain't no troll, I want to debate too but I'm forced to debate casual. I like trolling but I like helping boost others ego as well since I don't want one.
Also, to further mention, I only posted that because I wanted me and a stranger to have access to ranked arguments, there is no real debates within casual, it's just makes no difference what so ever.
First of all, I'm am not a troll. This website is dead as a fly that was hit multiple times by a flyswatter. Also, if it wouldn't of been for me accepting this, this would have been forgotten, besides, I actually found evidence, but still, it's a lose-lose argument. "Whether the metric or imperial system is better depends on various factors1. The metric system offers advantages in terms of standardization and global consistency, while the Imperial system retains significance in certain contexts and cultures. For specific applications, such as drill bits, metric or imperial may be preferred based on hole size."
stawp it, im blushing
Here's the thing, this format that you are using is so demanding, that I have to be here online so much to the point where I accidentally forfeit because I have work to take care of, please try making it longer, because in a online debate, it takes hours to construct a paragraph that truly makes sense, not only that, but you have a terrible parameter, 1,000 words?! That's enough letters to create a claim, but it removes the cons ability to counterargue/claim, and come with their own reasoning, especially with two rounds.
Your right, it is a cult.
I will test my ignorance with this.
How is that different from regular reproduction?
Ill take you on dis one
I edge to this show ngl.
Erm... As a sigma male, I don't find this very appeasing. We are the alphas!!!!