BigPimpDaddy

The Democrats, News, Celebrities, are all a bunch of Commies

 a principal tenet of anarchism is to avoid hierarchies unless it is both necessary and justified 

Last time "SCIENCE said the year 2000

the main pushers of porn and pedophilia are left-wing

This is a corporate mandate. Unexplained and highly sus.

The presence of coercive elements is not sexual assault.

Unexplained and highly sus.

It wasn't sexual assault in the sense of physical force. There was the facade of consent. But, considering she was a lowly White House intern and he was the literal most powerful man in the world, I think there is inherently some coercion present because of that power distance.

Do you think that she could reasonably have said 'no' to a request for a blowjob? Don't you think she considered that there could be severe consequences if she upset the president?

It’s possible. But the posts on Facebook are missing some important context about how YouTube handles likes and dislikes on its videos. And they don’t offer any evidence that YouTube did so improperly or for political reasons.
YouTube told PolitiFact that it has systems in place to ensure that engagements with videos — such as likes and dislikes — are authentic, so that the analytics information it provides is reliable. Those systems worked as designed to remove spam engagement on this video, according to YouTube. The de-spamming process starts when a video is uploaded and continues to run to ensure metrics remain accurate, YouTube said.
In 2019, The Verge reported that YouTube considered removing the dislike button from its videos entirely, in an effort to stop so-called dislike mobs — groups who organize to dislike a video because they are frustrated with the content creator or channel — from "weaponizing" it. 
YouTube’s verified account on Twitter has also addressed the issue of removing likes and dislikes. 
"YouTube regularly removes any spam likes or dislikes from your videos. It may take up to 48 hours for the numbers to be updated," one tweet reads. Another said: "We always validate the activities & legitimacy of accounts added on your likes/dislikes report. This is to make sure that our site metrics are free of spam."
It is not clear how YouTube determines whether engagement is authentic or spam. YouTube did not address the specific actions taken on the Psaki briefing video, which had 32,000 dislikes as of Jan. 25, and 7,700 likes.
So it is possible YouTube removed dislikes it deemed "spam" from videos posted by the White House account, including the Jan. 20 press briefing video. But there is no evidence YouTube deliberately removed authentic dislikes from the video to support the Biden administration or silence critics.

Youtube? They don't give a fuck about you. Why do you give a fuck about them?

Who said it was legitimate.

It's actually a source taken from a radical left wing hack site called "politifact"

Previously Youtube tried to help Biden by removing dislikes from his video postings. Apparently that didn't work.

Imagine if the FBI protected the people instead of the plutocrats.

I think Biden is behaving like a strong leader using the FBI to crush his enemies of the state.

Very true. Biden is no Progressive, let alone a Socialist. However, that latter brand is what is leading him by the nose, because Biden truly has no core, he's as malleable as soft clay.

Parents don't want Teachers indoctrinated in CRT anywhere near their kids. If the schools insist on indoctrinating all the teachers with CRT, the parents can insist their kids can be shielded from it. Parents don't need to be compelled by an authoritative state to expose their kids to racist teachers.

Most of the parents that don't want racist teachers are minorities, which shows you the monumental degree of just how out of touch the establishment elites are.

Virginia deserves to go red under the incompetent watch of those elites.

This week, the president took a trip to Virginia to try to help salvage the gubernatorial prospects of fellow Washington lifer Terry McAuliffe. President Joe Biden used the appearance to liken the GOP gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin to Jan. 6 rioters, to lie about Republicans supporting “book bans” and to attempt to goad former President Donald Trump into coming to Virginia. (Mission accomplished? Perhaps not.)

Biden wants to talk about one person these days, and that person isn’t Biden. Then again, what does he possibly have to brag about? Shutting down COVID? More Americans have died from the disease this year than last year, even with the emergence of vaccines. “I will not shut down the country,” Biden promised during his campaign. “I will shut down the virus.”

Now, of course coronavirus isn’t really the president’s fault. But since Biden had no compunction blaming Trump personally for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of citizens, no one can fault voters for using the same standard of culpability now.

Is Biden going to brag about overseeing what promises to be the weakest economic recovery since the last time he was put in charge of such things? Rather than looking for ways to create more opportunities for American workers, the president has been clamoring to put millions of them on the dole.

Is the president going to talk about the border? Is he once again going to explain how high inflation is actually a positive development for most consumers? Is he going to brag about his foreign policy? When was the last time an American president abandoned hundreds of US citizens to a terror regime?

After 13 service members were murdered by terrorists in Kabul, due in part to his administration’s stark incompetence, we proceeded to accidentally kill seven children in retaliation. The terrorists disappeared only slightly faster than the media coverage.

No, Biden is going to talk about Trump.

It’s worth mentioning, as well, that while Democrats were in a constant state of feigned dismay over the lack of decorum during the Trump years — Biden often promised to “restore decency” to the White House — they are just as guilty of corroding our public discourse.

On Youngkin, for example, Biden said, “Extremism can come in many forms. It can come in the rage of a mob driven to assault the Capitol. It can come in a smile and a fleece vest.” It isn’t surprising to hear unhinged pundits conflating the Jan. 6 rioters with Republicans who have never uttered a word of support for the attack on the Capitol, but coming from the president of the United States, a president whose campaign was grounded on the promise of mending a frayed nation and normalizing political behavior, it’s particularly ugly.

Right, because we choose to pay rent and bills? 

You don't have to pay rent if you don't live in a house. You don't have to pay for bills if don't want water and electricity. 

I used to also be an anarchist, but now I think governments are necessary to protect people from foreign armies. 

You don't have to pay rent if you don't live in a house. You don't have to pay for bills if don't want water and electricity. 

So, the robber laughs, does it again.

And Black Nazis used tiki torches to destroy Democracy in Virginia. Erik Swalwell does not approve.