Total votes: 3
Pro's failure to appear in the last round gives conduct to Pro. Other than that the debate itsekf was a comolete mess and probably should have never been started in the first place.
Arguments tied because of the numerous dropped or uncontested points by both sides. The individual contentions each evolved just enough as the debate progressed that it would be unfair to award points to either side given that the original points argued for were not ultimately defended or deconstructed by the end of the debate. (Ex. contention 1: Trump's well documented infringement in Justice Dept. matters scrutinizing or affecting him devokved into a back and forth on SoS Clinton's private email server. This whole thing was going to end up being a tie but upon visiting Con's single source calling CNN biased I found a disclaimer link at the bottom of the page regarding claims of accuracy or objectivity in its assessments of bias. Pro's more fact-based sources give him the points.
Sources go to Con for the quotes provided surrounding context to Trump's challenge, Warren's reaction, and Trump's counter. Conduct as well for Pro's forfeit and employment of a rebuttal in R1 in violation of the agrreed scheme of the debate. Given that the debate scheme calls for rebuttals in R2 only and Pro failed to post an R2 entirely, arg also goes to Con as Pro failed to meaningfully challenge the premise of their R1 case.