Greyparrot attributes a quote to Nickjken that was said by *me* and not him and this seems to form the basis of his vote in my favor. Indeed, he reiterates this point in second to last sentence of his vote. He says:
"I think Pro's response of "so what" was basically a concession on that crucial point, so I will have to award Con a point on arguments."
But the "so what" reply came from me as a response to Nickjken's skeptical theist objection to the problem of evil. So the basis of Greyparrot's vote in support of me rest on a confusion. Since this the case, I don't see how his vote can be considered sufficient.
Is God Necessary for Morality? | William Lane Craig & Shelly Kagan at Columbia University
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rm2wShHJ2iA&t=1038s
Evil God Challenge (Stephen Law)
www.jstor.org/stable/40927250
Knowledge,Reality, and Value: A Mostly Common Sense Guide to Philosophy by Michael Huemer. Link to book: www.amazon.com/Knowledge-Reality-Value-Mostly-Philosophy/dp/B0BC2FPBJH/ref=tmm_aud_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
Sources:
The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene
The Eternal Block Universe:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8G-eq7uGX4
Sense and Goodness without God by Richard Carrier
Dr. Craig Interview on Eternalism:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4Wx18K9jUE
Does Time Really Pass?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SSvFuwW6dY&t=338s
Perlov, Delia; Vilenkin, Alexander (7 August 2017). Cosmology for the Curious. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 330–31.
Dr. Craig and Dr. Carroll Debate:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0qKZqPy9T8&t=3955s
Russell-Copleston Debate:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVLKURgfft0&t=865s
Lucid Logic by Paul Stearns
I appreciate you taking the time to vote on the debate but I just couldn't help mentioning that you quoted me rather than Nick.
Greyparrot attributes a quote to Nickjken that was said by *me* and not him and this seems to form the basis of his vote in my favor. Indeed, he reiterates this point in second to last sentence of his vote. He says:
"I think Pro's response of "so what" was basically a concession on that crucial point, so I will have to award Con a point on arguments."
But the "so what" reply came from me as a response to Nickjken's skeptical theist objection to the problem of evil. So the basis of Greyparrot's vote in support of me rest on a confusion. Since this the case, I don't see how his vote can be considered sufficient.
Is God Necessary for Morality? | William Lane Craig & Shelly Kagan at Columbia University
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rm2wShHJ2iA&t=1038s
Evil God Challenge (Stephen Law)
www.jstor.org/stable/40927250
Knowledge,Reality, and Value: A Mostly Common Sense Guide to Philosophy by Michael Huemer. Link to book: www.amazon.com/Knowledge-Reality-Value-Mostly-Philosophy/dp/B0BC2FPBJH/ref=tmm_aud_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
Sources:
The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene
The Eternal Block Universe:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8G-eq7uGX4
Sense and Goodness without God by Richard Carrier
Dr. Craig Interview on Eternalism:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4Wx18K9jUE
Does Time Really Pass?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SSvFuwW6dY&t=338s
Perlov, Delia; Vilenkin, Alexander (7 August 2017). Cosmology for the Curious. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 330–31.
Dr. Craig and Dr. Carroll Debate:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0qKZqPy9T8&t=3955s
Russell-Copleston Debate:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVLKURgfft0&t=865s
Lucid Logic by Paul Stearns