16kadams

Brazil

I get my information exclusively from online anonymous schizos with anime, pepe, or groyper pfps. They seem to have a good track record.

seethe 

Gender: female

Opinion: discarded 

Can it not be both?

I didn’t even know I had this account ngl

The assumption that peer review increases the quality of work assumes that experts are actually experts. Most scientists are statistically illiterate, for example. The entire system is circular. 

If a non expert has their work reviewed by a non expert, that is still a form of peer review. It does not increase the quality of the work; for peer review to actually matter, you are presupposing something which does not exist, namely, that "experts" are usually competent. Seriously, read that first link. Also interesting: In one experiment, Over half of the papers with basic chemistry errors got published. 

Honestly if we were ruled by puritans, that would be exceedingly based

Are you denying that politicians actually say stuff like that? 

And while you are right that no climate scientist (that I am aware of) has said the world will end in X number of years, they have said things like there will be no Arctic ice in the summer (see, e.g., James Hansen).

Thanks, king

Only a r*dditor would know what should be on r*ddit

Fed

I will never get the vax idc what ZOG says

Proud LatinX in favor of closing the door behind me

This debate just boils down to climate sensitivity estimates tbh.