This is how Canada deals with the deep state fear-mongering.

Author: Greyparrot

Posts

Total: 48
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10

C: Hello Mr Paliov um a number of your own comments and actions have been um
characterized as dog whistling by the far right...

P: By who?

C: by a number of...

P: By Who?

C: but I think it's been characterized by that way but are you trying to show it...

P: By who? Sorry I just need to clarify by who??

C: By a number of different experts and a number of...

P: Who are the experts?

C: okay, well it's been established that this is this is a concern are you trying to court the far right vote all right...

P: Sorry who are these experts?
You say that there are "experts" who are saying this... who are they???

C: My question is are you trying to court...

P: Sorry I am sorry, but your question seems to be based on a false premise.
You can't even tell me who these experts are. It sounds like it's just a CBC smear job. Thank you.

C: But what about the question about whether....

P: The answer is that I have a common sense agenda to ax the carbon tax, bring home powerful paychecks, clear the way to build affordable homes, to put those people in housing that they they can afford. That is a common sense mainstream Canadian agenda. And I know that Justin Trudeau's supporters are so desperate to distract from that because his political career is falling apart, so we're seeing an attempt here to distract and protect Justin Trudeau from his extremely unpopular carbon taxes and other failing policies, but we won't let him or him or others distract from that reality, so thank you.

Fkn Based.

What do you guys think?

n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,023
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
who needs experts anyway? we dont need no education, we don't need no thought control 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgim
Especially unidentifiable experts. The mythological expert.
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@Greyparrot
It's on YouTube 


It must be true.  Lol
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Vegasgiants
Oh, those silly Canadians faking interviews!

It's a conspiracy!
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@Greyparrot
I saw Bigfoot on YouTube.  Lol
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Vegasgiants
Cool story bro. Keep up with those Canadian conspiracies!
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@Greyparrot
Youtube.....your source for investigative reporting.  Lol
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Vegasgiants
Right, cause this particular youtube clip was clearly fabricated. Tin foil salute!
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@Greyparrot
Clearly youtube is pulitzer prize material.  I always trust it as a source 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Vegasgiants
No, you should clearly denounce every youtube as fakery. Especially this particular youtube clip featuring a Canadian man moving his mouth and sounds coming out from it.

The tinfoil brigade demands it.

 pulitzer prize material..
I seriously doubt this particular Canadian politician is prize worthy, but never let a good conspiracy theory go to waste!
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@Greyparrot
I do.  Why would anyone go there for news when there are reputable sources?

Because they don't want reputable sources
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Vegasgiants
It's a clip of a speech. What's a reputable news agency going to do to make that clip any more believable?

What sources would be acceptable for you to believe the man speaking those words was not an AI fabrication?

How do you know fake videos phish you with the illusion of the "reputable news moniker" (as many news agencies have been caught green-screening complete fabrications)

Better start tuning in to channel tinfoil.

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Vegasgiants
If you have any specific examples of that clip that suggest it is a fake, or if you have sources that counter it's authenticity, I would be willing to entertain such a notion.

Otherwise, I regrettably have to dismiss your tinfoil dogma.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
ALL ALONE🎶🎶🎶
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Vegasgiants
The reputable source will be the one we want to hear.

Credibility

Who needs credibility?

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
There used to be a time where 1st hand sources were the gold standard. Now, it's all fake.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
"Just remember, what you are seeing and what you are reading is not what's happening" - Donald Trump
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
Yeah, now everyone is paranoid.
Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@zedvictor4
I do
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,166
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
An unidentified expert is an expert at nothing.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@sadolite
An unidentified expert is an expert at nothing.

Exactly. Glad you took the time to watch the video rather than sperging all over the place about conspiracy theories.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Vegasgiants
But the truth might not be what you want to hear.


Vegasgiants
Vegasgiants's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 1,327
3
3
2
Vegasgiants's avatar
Vegasgiants
3
3
2
-->
@zedvictor4
If you're getting it from youtube....it's probably not the truth
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
But the truth might not be what you want to hear.
He didn't watch the video, so he doesn't know how tinfoil he appears. I think he assumed it was a news clip.

Like a dog barking at a strange noise.
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@Greyparrot
1) it's Poilievre, not Paliov

2) this isn't "based", this is classic dodging of the question. Poilievre is a right wing troll who has never held a real job in his entire life. His entire life, his job has basically been to troll people. To try to get them upset and then dance away from any kind of actual questioning. He's really good at it.

He won't actually answer the question because the answer is yes. He does dog whistle to the far right. That is the main reason he is the leader of the conservatives.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
He does dog whistle to the far right. 

According to what expert?
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@Greyparrot
According to what expert?
I mean, this isn't hard. Google search Poilievre and dog whistle. There's lots of results, he's been doing it for 20 years. 

Here is a tweet of him threatening to pull funding for schools that don't give in to his demands on what "free speech" is. The only ones thinking this is an issue is the far right. Basically, they want the right to spread far right(in some cases full on nazi) propaganda at schools. Schools keep banning nazi speakers from coming there and they are pissed about. 

He routinely attacks ‘globalist Davos elites’, which to the right is a synonym of Jewish conspiracy. 

He regularly promises to be anti-woke which is just a blanket term for anything right wing assholes don't like. Attacking "wokeness" is just a way to say you'll do things the far right wants without having to confirm what that is, since most people would be appalled. 


I realize that you won't see most of this as dog whistling, because you are the kind of person he is trying to dog whistle to. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
I'm just asking what expert. If I click your link, will it tell me what expert?

 because you are the kind of person he is trying to dog whistle to. 
I didn't think Canadians have libertarians. And libertarians are hardly far right.

I made this thread to point out how media uses fake sources to drive their narratives. That's concerning no matter what team you choose to side with.