-->
@Greyparrot
He is clearly referring to illegal homicide, not justified.
The Lunatic Fringe (the LGBTQAI+-./.) Cult will do ANYTHING to stop the TRUTH from coming out...
Posts
Total:
131
LGBTs are good
-->
@TWS1405_2
Nevertheless straight white males need to stop raping.And yet black men are on the sex registry at a rate double that of white men.
Well you get can on those registries even if you don't rape anyone, but I have no hesitation in saying: straight black males need to stop raping.
PS I would describe gender dysphoria as an even more minor issue than homosexual marriageNo gay marriage sexually assaulted little girls in school bathrooms, or invaded girls spaces with their tallywhacker hanging out.
"gender dysphoria" is not assault. I'm trying to lead you to water here... something about the issue not justifying the remedy or reaction demanded...
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
PS I would describe gender dysphoria as an even more minor issue than homosexual marriageNo gay marriage sexually assaulted little girls in school bathrooms, or invaded girls spaces with their tallywhacker hanging out."gender dysphoria" is not assault. I'm trying to lead you to water here... something about the issue not justifying the remedy or reaction demanded...
“Gender dysphoria” is a psychiatric mental illness diagnosis. Those afflicted with it are the ones doing the sexual assaulting.
-->
@FishChaser
LGBTs are good
Got anything remotely useful to contribute?
-->
@TWS1405_2
My ability to create forum topics is the contribution.
-->
@FishChaser
That’s not a forum topic, that’s a current threaded discussion distraction/red herring/derailment.
-->
@TWS1405_2
Gender dysphoria has in the main, become a socio-psychologically inspired trend.
A bit like food intolerances.
Which isn't to say that a very very small percentage of people don't present with genuine sexual development aberrations or genuine food intolerances.
-->
@zedvictor4
Tell me something that I don’t already know.
-->
@TWS1405_2
It's raining in Wales.
Tough you could probably have guessed.
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I refute aggressive or personal. I gave evidence of bigotry to undermine a bigoted argument.So calling people bigots and racists is back on the menu boyz.There's a billion bigot and racist sites on the internet, and these geniuses come to a debate site looking for an echo chamber LOL.FYI snowflakes, you can post all the racism and bigotry you want at Stormfront and nobody is gonna say you are a racist or bigot.Whether someone is a bigot is entirely besides the point.
No it isn’t, it is central to the point. Bigotry is a matter of prejudice, hatred, and disenfranchising groups of people, it is in and of itself, offensive and insulting . It represents behavior and opinions that elicit a certain response from others, and it is the ultimate hypocrisy to think a racist can be a racist but other’s aren’t allowed to respond because snowflake racists can handle the truth.
You don’t get to just declare that it doesn’t matter, maybe it doesn’t matter to a racist, but outside the trailer park, to the rest of the world, it matters.
It was TWS who was just claiming "truth" is an absolute defense that somehow means insults aren't insults.
That is complete nonsense, the thing with racists is to proclaim your racism is the “truth” and then proclaim that it means you aren’t a racist, racists aren’t racists, they are truth tellers LOL, racists are comical, something to laugh at, and if they don’t like being called racist, maybe they should stop being racists. It’s OK to have that opinion, but you should at least wear big floppy shoes and a red Styrofoam nose when you do it.
Whether you think someone is a bigot is irrelevant.
No, it isn’t, bigotry is about how the person relates to others, it is a specific manner of relating to others, and consequently, whether I think someone is a bigot is a primary factor that determines how I will relate to them. Decent people, people who are not bigots, think that when you demean others you demean yourself. The bigot determines their relationships with others, it’s just stupid to proclaim that it is irrelevant, “just because I’m a bigot people shouldn’t act like I’m a bigot”, I am here to offend people who are different than me, but people who are different than me have no right to offend me, they should know their place LOL. Maybe add a top hat with a flower sticking out of it to the floppy shoes and red nose.
Whether you can prove someone is irrational and stubborn is irrelevant.
Except you aren’t talking about a debate site, you are talking about an echo chamber, on a debate site proving someone irrational is relevant, it’s not an echo chamber, you guys can’t expect the mods to delete anyone who disagrees with you here, if that’s what you want, there are plenty echo chambers for you.
Calling someone a bigot or a racist is still an insult (unless they agree its not).
LOL, yes, I almost forgot bigots are snowflakes, they get to insult others, but others better not insult them, if a trans person wants us to use a different pronoun, fuck them, but I still expect them to comply with my wishes in how you refer to me, and true or not, I prefer you don’t use the word bigot or racist, it’s offensive to me, my bigotry and racism is only supposed to be offensive to the them of my us/them thinking. Let’s add huge oversized pants to the floppy shoes, red nose, and funny hat.
This is entirely inconsistent with the so called new interpretation of the CoC (which still hasn't been updated for some reason).
You mean the post that said it was done to “clarify how moderation will enforce existing rules on the site going forward”, the rules were existing, and the post clarified, so nothing needs to be updated.
I read the post about the new CoC and it didn’t say anything about everybody should be a whiny little bitch going forward, it didn’t say if someone disagrees with you report them to barney, it didn’t say snowflakes get to determine what words are offensive. It just gave the existing whiny little bitches some clarification about what they should whine about.
As far as I'm concerned anything oromagi does himself is fair game. I won't be obeying hypocrisy.
Whoa, are you telling me bigots are gonna be bigots, gee whiz, thanks for clearing that up for me, and yeah, bigots and racist always see hypocrisy, they want exclusivity on their coveted snowflake victimhood.
The real hypocrisy is racist and bigots thinking they can offend and not be offended, they can insult and not be insulted, that they can be lowlife pieces of shit but expect people to admire them.
The typical racist is at the bottom of society in almost every aspect, intellectually, economically, morally, educationally, and it is with contempt born of jealousy that they want someone to look down on, but being the underbelly of society, there just isn’t anyone below them, so they make up reasons to look down on people, race, religion, color, sexual orientation, anything to pretend they aren’t at the bottom, but no matter how hard they try, people of another race, religion, color, sexual orientation, are all looking down on their pathetic lives.
They sit in their emotional squalor, drinking their Haterade, desperate for attention, desperate to matter, mostly invisible, but if society even notices them, if society feels anything for them, they feel sorry for them.
Please feel free to scan for other words you feel you get to choose to be offended by, but to save you some time, the words for a whiny little bitch to report to the mods are “racist”, “bigot”, “lowlife pieces of shit”, “whiny little bitch”, and “snowflake”.
SW:
Whether someone is a bigot is entirely besides the point.No it isn’t, it is central to the point. Bigotry is a matter of prejudice, hatred, and disenfranchising groups of people, it is in and of itself, offensive and insulting.
Get a dictionary, FFS!
Prejudices: preconceived judgment or opinion
Both have everything to do with subjective (i.e., uninformed, fictional, fallacious based) opinions. Uninformed = bigotry. Uninformed = prejudice.
Neither of which have anything to do with objective (i.e., fact based) opinions. Truth =/= bigotry. Truth =/= prejudice.
It represents behavior and opinions that elicit a certain response from others, and it is the ultimate hypocrisy to think a racist can be a racist but other’s aren’t allowed to respond because snowflake racists can handle the truth.You don’t get to just declare that it doesn’t matter, maybe it doesn’t matter to a racist, but outside the trailer park, to the rest of the world, it matters.
It represents no such thing as you assert. People think for themselves, they are not automatons. It (actual bigotry and prejudice) elicits nothing other than revulsion or further discussion or turning away from said discussion.
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate the truth. That's you. So you label that truth as bigotry, prejudice, and racist. It's patently absurd.
It was TWS who was just claiming "truth" is an absolute defense that somehow means insults aren't insults.That is complete nonsense,
Truth [is] an absolute defense. That's just a fact of reality.
Whether you think someone is a bigot is irrelevant.No, it isn’t, bigotry is about how the person relates to others,
That's such bullshit, so much so only a dolt would tell themselves that over and over again in order to believe it their truth.
it is a specific manner of relating to others
No it is not. FFS, where did you matriculate to earning your degree in social psychology!?!
whether I think someone is a bigot is a primary factor that determines how I will relate to them.
Denialism of the truth releases your inner bigot and consequently your psychological projection.
Calling someone a bigot or a racist is still an insult (unless they agree its not).LOL, yes, I almost forgot bigots are snowflakes, they get to insult others, but others better not insult them, if a trans person wants us to use a different pronoun, fuck them, but I still expect them to comply with my wishes in how you refer to me, and true or not, I prefer you don’t use the word bigot or racist, it’s offensive to me, my bigotry and racism is only supposed to be offensive to the them of my us/them thinking. Let’s add huge oversized pants to the floppy shoes, red nose, and funny hat.
That is the most ignorant nonsensical pile of word salad bullshit that I've ever seen on DART.
You're so desperate to be right and sound so stupendous you're just pulling shit out of thin air and out of your intellectual cowardice arse!!!
The rest of your self-centered BS isn't even worth commenting on further. It speaks volumes for itself and screams everything anyone needs to know about you. You will NEVER be taken seriously at DART. EVER!
-->
@TWS1405_2
Yeah, I'm sure the woman who was verbally accosted at Starbucks by the guy claiming to be a woman - AND that the individual filming the event who was assaulted by the dude - both felt that their fear was just "dramatically overblown. *FP*So on and so forth.
This is like when a politician uses an anecdote of little Timmy who lived thanks to a new healthcare law to then proclaim that if you oppose the law that must mean you want little Timmy to die.
When I talk about your position being dramatically overblown I’m talking about on a societal level, you of course decided to go back to anecdotes.
Any individual experiencing a terrifying situation is justified in their fear, but we don’t change or decide on public policy because Sarah Beth got scared. You need to step back and look at the entire picture.
Oddly enough, I could sit here and give you plenty of anecdotal examples of how your activism has ruined lives and created just as much of a situation of real fear for trans people and you wouldn’t give a rats ass, so spare me the drama and theatrics.
They are not hard to find, not hard at all because they are increasing far beyond your obvious denialism.
Then provide the statistics
Out of 330 million, they would be very hard to find. The average is only about 1k shootings per year, and very few of them are "unarmed." Like 13 in 2019, for example. So no, you could NOT find "example after example" that would justify the whole asinine unsubstantiated BS "police brutality" claim against unarmed black males. I mean really, black males are shot by police (not always killed) at a rate of about 2.5-3x which pales in comparison to cops being shot and killed in the line of duty by black males at a rate of 18.5x. And despite this glaring fact, you certainly won't be sporting any black and blue flags in support of law enforcement killed by violent criminals.
So when it comes to trans people all you need are a few anecdotal examples, but when it comes to black people being killed all of a sudden the only thing that matters are statistics. Got it.
But it clearly is not a fallacy, it is a premised upon Precedential slopes, "which revolve around the idea that treating a relatively minor issue (gay marriage) a certain way now will lead to us treating a relatively major issue (the sexualizing of children, grooming children, transing children, invading women's spaces, etc) the same way later on."
Progress in society is made one step at a time, that doesn’t mean one step causes the other. That’s the fallacy.
Black people didn’t go from slaves to free to integrated to equal overnight, those were all accomplished one step at a time. It wasn’t the steps that got them there, it was the changing of society over time as ignorance was replaced with knowledge.
The same exact thing is happening with gay/trans rights. People are learning that they aren’t any different from the rest of us and deserve to be treated respectfully and included in our society. You can roll back rights all you want, that’s not going to undo the fact that future generations, who will know far better, will look back at you the same way we look at 1920’s White people who thought they needed to form the KKK to stop black people from being a part of our society.
"Your example from before was of some handful of activists taking over our entire society with policies that are harmful to the people of the country."Strawman fallacy.
It wasn’t. You’re either arguing that the laws around the country will be hijacked by a minority, or you’re arguing that the people of the country will disagree with you and self govern their way to laws you don’t like. It clearly wasn’t the latter.
-->
@Double_R
@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Yeah, I'm sure the woman who was verbally accosted at Starbucks by the guy claiming to be a woman - AND that the individual filming the event who was assaulted by the dude - both felt that their fear was just "dramatically overblown. *FP*So on and so forth.This is like when a politician uses an anecdote of little Timmy who lived thanks to a new healthcare law to then proclaim that if you oppose the law that must mean you want little Timmy to die.
All factually accurate slippery slopes start small, and like a small snowball rolling down a long hill, it grows and grows and grows until it hits rock bottom.
When I talk about your position being dramatically overblown (sic) I’m talking about on a societal level, you of course decided to go back to anecdotes.
There are two different kinds of anecdotes. One is the exception to the rule, the other is the rule. I am addressing the rule. History has already bore that reality out since gay marriage was legislated from the bench at SCOTUS.
Any individual experiencing a terrifying situation is justified in their fear, but we don’t change or decide on public policy because Sarah Beth got scared. You need to step back and look at the entire picture.
No, one person and the crime against them cannot change the world (i.e., the law). But numerous Sarah Beth's can. And that is what we have been witnessing since men have been allowed socially, culturally, and as of late, legally to invade, threaten, and harm little girls, teen girls and women by invading their safe, private, employment, medical, and homelife places. And because of denialists like you, this snowball will continue to roll down the hill with not only speed but in force due to its size.
Oddly enough, I could sit here and give you plenty of anecdotal examples of how your activism has ruined lives and created just as much of a situation of real fear for trans people and you wouldn’t give a rats ass, so spare me the drama and theatrics.
Okay. Do it. Prove how I, me individually, not anyone else in this country, but me, just me, as you stated, "how YOUR activism" has "ruined lives and created just as much of a situation of real fear for trans people." Put the proverbial money where your mouth is.
Good luck.
ROTFLMAO!!!!
They are not hard to find, not hard at all because they are increasing far beyond your obvious denialism.Then provide the statistics
Statistics for what? Helps if you quote with context than without it. *FP*
Out of 330 million, they would be very hard to find. The average is only about 1k shootings per year, and very few of them are "unarmed." Like 13 in 2019, for example. So no, you could NOT find "example after example" that would justify the whole asinine unsubstantiated BS "police brutality" claim against unarmed black males. I mean really, black males are shot by police (not always killed) at a rate of about 2.5-3x which pales in comparison to cops being shot and killed in the line of duty by black males at a rate of 18.5x. And despite this glaring fact, you certainly won't be sporting any black and blue flags in support of law enforcement killed by violent criminals.So when it comes to trans people all you need are a few anecdotal examples, but when it comes to black people being killed all of a sudden (sic) the only thing that matters are statistics. Got it.
HA HA! Proved you wrong and you spin it into this nonsensical tripe. Can't make this shit up. ROTFLMAO!!!
But it clearly is not a fallacy, it is a premised upon Precedential slopes, "which revolve around the idea that treating a relatively minor issue (gay marriage) a certain way now will lead to us treating a relatively major issue (the sexualizing of children, grooming children, transing children, invading women's spaces, etc.) the same way later on."Progress in society is made one step at a time, that doesn’t mean one step causes the other. That’s the fallacy.
YES, IT DOES when it comes to liberal progressive insane and outsane politics.
Black people didn’t go from slaves to free to integrated to equal overnight, those were all accomplished one step at a time.
Yes, one step at a time and one step caused/resulted in the other along the way.
The same exact thing is happening with gay/trans rights.
To the detriment of children's, teen's and adult's lives who need mental health, not pandering to their mental delusions via the social contagion encapsulating them.
People are learning that they aren’t any different from the rest of us and deserve to be treated respectfully and included in our society.
People are only the same at birth, then as they grow and become more cognizant of who and what they are, and can be, is where that equality (similarity) changes. Fact of life. They become very different as they succumb to the bullshit sold to them (snake oil) by the liberal progressive fascist democrats shoving it in their faces.
You can roll back rights all you want, that’s not going to undo the fact that future generations, who will know far better, will look back at you the same way we look at 1920’s White people who thought they needed to form the KKK to stop black people from being a part of our society.
BWAAAHAAAHAAAHAAA!!!! The current generation doesn't know shit about anything other than ass backwards, and that generation is teaching further generations the same fascist/Marxist/SJW nonsense!!! They will continue to destroy America, as they ALL hate America. The very country that gives them the freedom to hate it, and they sure as shit won't leave it for another country because they would lose the freedom AND opportunities they have here. Hypocrisy at its finest.
ONLY DEMOCRATS formed the KKK and since still continue to try to stop black people from being a part of American society.
"Your example from before was of some handful of activists taking over our entire society with policies that are harmful to the people of the country."Strawman fallacy.It wasn’t. You’re either arguing that the laws around the country will be hijacked by a minority, or you’re arguing that the people of the country will disagree with you and self govern their way to laws you don’t like. It clearly wasn’t the latter.
Yes, it was. That is NOT what I said/implied. Period.
Reading comprehension matters.
-->
@TWS1405_2
There are two different kinds of anecdotes. One is the exception to the rule, the other is the rule. I am addressing the rule.
You have yet to demonstrate that this is the rule, that’s kind of the point of this conversation.
Statistics for what? Helps if you quote with context than without it. *FP*
The claim you are making.
HA HA! Proved you wrong and you spin it into this nonsensical tripe. Can't make this shit up. ROTFLMAO!!!
You don’t have to reply to every single statement I make. If you have nothing intelligent to say you can just not respond.
Progress in society is made one step at a time, that doesn’t mean one step causes the other. That’s the fallacy.YES, IT DOES when it comes to liberal progressive insane and outsane politics.
No it doesn’t. So there.
ONLY DEMOCRATS formed the KKK and since still continue to try to stop black people from being a part of American society.
You can’t seriously be this ignorant.
The Democratic Party of the early 20th century was the conservative political right party. The republicans were the progressive leftists. The parties switched about mid century.
It’s not the party label that matters, it’s the ideology. Yours is the one that centuries ago defended slavery.
Nothing else worthy of a response.
"We would teach people these new vocabulary words and gender identity ideology. And I had no idea at the time that this new terminology was the language of female erasure that would be used to take away my own sex-based rights," the former pro-trans activist said."I was totally oblivious to the fact that I was being used as a Trojan horse because behind this message of inclusivity and kindness for everyone, there's a really sinister agenda to normalize these policies and practices that cause irreversible medical damage to healthy children and undermine the sex-based rights of women and girls," she told host Jesse Watters
How the transgender ideological movement has conquered American life - the Transgender Empire
House of Horrors - child gender affirming care
Trans Activist - Emotional blackmail, silencing women, and redefining language
Words have no more meaning - the outsanity of insanity
The TRUTH keeps coming out….the insanity is real, and it only keeps getting worse.
-->
@TWS1405_2
How do you tell a boy from a girl?
-->
@secularmerlin
@FishChaser
How do you tell a boy from a girl?
Saw 60 minutes interview with Afganny lady, who started a school for wide diversity { religon, rich/poors } of girls in Afghanistan, and were lucky to get out on the last of planes exiting Afghanistan.
As a child, her parents gave her a crew cut, dressed her as a boy, and had her walk a differrent route to house where several girls were secretly getting an education.
I think this woman stated that Afghanistan --under Taliban rule--- is the only country in world that does not allow school/education for girls.
The whole school of girls was scheduled to be transferred to Rwanda, to evade the incoming Taliban back to Kabul, but that offer fell through at just days before Taliban was on doorstep of Kabul.
The school of girls, had to pretend to be children of others who were cleared to exit at airport. One of the girls in the crowds of people had her scarf torn off her head, and she was terrified the Taliban would yank her away from the adults helping her to get out, but some one used some fabric they had put over her head as a scarf.
Stalls in restrooms is the starting point for any sex restrooms. From what ive seen and read, most intersex people identify as a woman.
However, as for hormone therapy;
...." Introduction: The number of individuals seeking sex hormone therapy for gender dysphoria has been increasing. The prevalence gender dysphoria has recently been estimated as high as 390 to 460 per 100,000 with a consistently greater prevalence of trans women (MTF) than trans men (FTM). "..
Oh wait a second, I misunderstood that on first reading. So the prevalence of trans women is men seeking to hormone treatment to be more womanly.
Again, this goes back to the X chromosome in men. X x - X y. Thats three X's for every y in Universe, if all were in equanimity.
Also, some people believe that the y is resultant of an aborted X, and all y's lack the structural and systemic integrity of the X, ergo, the y has been and will continue to disintegrate over next million years.
And finally, as Ive made clear before, there exists no males only species, that pop-out any off-spring or clones of themselves, as there is with some all female species of animals.
Males X y is less complex than female X x. Numerically less complex and systemically less complex.
It appears more men wanting to be more likened to their X chromosome is perhaps wanting to be a more complex human, eh?
-->
@ebuc
That was a... wow ebuc that was a delight to read... I understood everything. Either I'm getting smarter or you dumbed this down for me.
Either way thanks.
-->
@secularmerlin
Either way thanks.
Welcome
1} some days my grammar is better than others,
1} some days my grammar is better than others,
2} subject matter can be easier or harder for me to explain, depending,
3} sometimes time is limited ergo I rush to get this or that posted without proof reading etc.
3} sometimes time is limited ergo I rush to get this or that posted without proof reading etc.
-->
@ebuc
Welcome
Thanks its good to be back... I think
-->
@FishChaser
LGBT's are good.
For sure.
Recreational sex is fun.
I think that as a species, we realised this a few thousand years ago.
Though we've been experiencing hang-ups about it ever since.
And the search for sexual fulfilment is seemingly an unfulfilled quest.
Perhaps some sort of techno-implant is the solution.
Let's call it the ORGASMO.
All procreation will be In Vitro, and all workers will be asexually engineered and fitted with an automated ORGASMO implant.
No more sexual hang-ups.
S...........For Satisified.
-->
@zedvictor4
S...........For Satisified.
Orgasm alone is not total/complete satisfaction, as most humans desire and need human touch connection, as well as other non-touch connections/relatiohships.
There is genetic drive within X x - X y to get it on.
All of the getting it on is also about the foreplay, that, most often leads to orgasm.
Kissing, rubbing etc touch sensations that stimulate the libido.
All of the getting it on is also about the foreplay, that, most often leads to orgasm.
Kissing, rubbing etc touch sensations that stimulate the libido.
-->
@ebuc
For sure.
ORGASMO will provide an instantaneous and all encompassing physiological experience....Without having to think about it.
Currently, social media is awash with images of butch female footballers.
And I chuckle and ask myself
Hmmmmmmm, how far from the cave have we actually strayed.
Still can't quite get to grips with the penis vagina thing.
More truth on the lunatic mad scientist doctors mutilating children in the name of gender ideology!!!
-->
@zedvictor4
Neither will they.Still can't quite get to grips with the penis vagina thing.
7 days later
Well shit in the UK just took a turn for the worse in elevating “special rights and privileges” to the alphabet soup in order to spare their feelings from autistic teenagers.
🤦♂️
11 days later
School boards just cannot handle the truth when read to them from obscene alphabet soup themed graphic books.
Parents who read these books get physically escorted off public property for exercising their 1A rights.