False reporting is common in news. However, saying that Mexican can be white supremacist?
This is a typical example of deriving wrong conclusions from actual facts.
Or should I say, desired conclusions wrongly derived from actual facts.
I listened to Hitler's speeches on YouTube plenty of times. Does that mean I support Hitler? No.
I read Satanic Bible. Am I a satanist? No.
I read Quran. Am I a muslim? No.
But their logic for Mexican shooter is:
They literally try to find any kind of material on Mexican shooter, any kind of book that he owned, any joke he made... just to be able to label that shooter as right wing or white supremacist.
They are playing the game of blame.
"Transgender shooter was oppressed by right wing"
"Mexican shooter was inspired by right wing"
Blaming all problems in society on a particular group of people is a mentality commonly found in dictators who wish to control the masses.
