-->
@Greyparrot
0 bitches I can tell
Lauren Boebert was a prostitute and had two abortions. Republican hypocrisy never ends!
Posts
Total:
64
So is that new CoC activated yet? Isn't this utterly pointless insult posting Lebronskismith is doing exactly what it was trying to prevent?
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
My bad g
Lauren Boebert was a prostitute and had two abortions.
- Not true. I think the truth is way more interesting.
- Boebert moved to the small oil company town of Rifle in 2003 at the age of 16. She got a job at McDonalds's and met an 22 year old working the oil rigs named Jason Boebert.
- In 2004, Jason was convicted of showing his tattooed penis to two underage girls (there were four complaints total) while in the company of Ms. Boebert. Later that same year, Jason was convicted of physically assaulting Lauren while the 17 year old was pregant with his child. She didn't drop the charges against him but she did marry him three years later after giving birth to their second child. Lauren dropped of high school and did not get her GED until after securing the Republican nomination for the House in 2020.
- Lauren's political career started in 2019 when, deep in thralls of QAnon conspiracy theoriests, she challenged Beto O'Rouke on guns during a live Presidential Debate. The Texas oil company that essentially own Rifle, CO and employs her husband, then encouraged Lauren to run for congress on her new found fame while in they raised her husband's fortune from roughneck to natural gas executive. The Boeberts were fined by the IRS for trying to conceal the fact that they now receive half a million dollars in salary and substantial bonuses from Terra Energy. Anybody who looks at rate at which Boebert introduces legislation trying to deregulate natural gas and increase energy fees understands that her purpose in Congress is to represent Terra Energy.
- Boebert has never been convicted of prostitution but she has been convicted of disorderly conduct, failure to appear in court, careless driving, food poisoning 80 people with bad pork, defrauding her 2020 campaign of $22,000 dollars, defrauding her 2022 campaign of $6000 and tax fraud.
- I think Boebert represents everything Republicans want in a woman- a woman you can beat on, cheat on, molest underage girls with and she'll still do your bidding, pump out your babies, grandmother at the age of 36 and do your crimes for you while you kick back and enjoy the profits. That's the Republican view of women in a nutshell.
-->
@Best.Korea
Prostitution + 2 abortions?Not exactly a good representative of people who oppose to prostitution and abortions.
Why not?
What is better a politician who passed pro choice bills and never had abortions or one who has had abortions and whored herself and realizes why that is bad for society and opposes it
You haven’t demonstrated any credible examples.
I can repaste the definition of hypocrisy if you want.
I noticed you did not respond to what your parents and grandparents did to protest the internment camps.
Because it had nothing to do with whether FDR was a hypocrite.
Epstein has donated $147,426 to various Democrats and $18,250 to Republicans
So he donated 8x more to Democrats. This especially hurts your overly broad claim that "Republican hypocrisy never ends!" because you are holding the parties to a different standard. If neither party is clean, that proves my point.
How is this an example of hypocrisy?
The Democratic party claims to support children.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
What is better a politician who passed pro choice bills and never had abortions or one who has had abortions and whored herself and realizes why that is bad for society and opposes it
The one who opposes to abortions is better, of course.
However, I would prefer "someone who opposes to abortions plus who never had an abortion" over "someone who had an abortion but now opposes to abortions".
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Forgot to tag you
-->
@Best.Korea
There personal choices with their body are none of your business, so long as they are willing to restrict the bodily autonomy of others.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
There personal choices with their body are none of your business, so long as they are willing to restrict the bodily autonomy of others.
I would disagree with that just a little, since I value people based on all of their actions I am aware of. So yes, all else being equal between the two: not having abortion>having abortion.
-->
@Savant
Because it had nothing to do with whether FDR was a hypocrite.
False. If they were American citizens it’s their duty to object, protest, and make their voices heard.
-->
@Savant
The Democratic party claims to support children.
And they do. Certainly more than the Republican Party that puts ownership of assault weapons over children’s safety.
If they were American citizens it’s their duty to object, protest, and make their voices heard.
How does that have anything to do with whether FDR was a hypocrite?
And they do.
One of their biggest donors didn't.
-->
@Savant
One of their biggest donors didn't.
If you think $148,000 makes Epstein one of the biggest donors you are soft. That’s peanuts.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
"Most famous," then. Instead of arguing about what qualifies as "big," perhaps we should agree that hypocrites can be cherry-picked from either party.
-->
@Savant
perhaps we should agree that hypocrites can be cherry-picked from either party.
Perhaps we should agree that there are degrees of hypocrisy and people who identify as Republican are champions at hypocrisy.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
So far I've listed 13 more examples than you have.
Fanchick be chuggin the Bud Light koolaid hard while defending Democrat hypocrisy.
2023 copium
-->
@Savant
So far I've listed 13 more examples than you have.
And I don’t think you’ve read or thought about any of them
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Agree to disagree
Still waiting for any concrete verifiable evidence of the claims of this thread. Not going to happen, obviously. Just another rant from a TDS dick sucking clown FANCHICK of trump’s successes in life. Clearly
Even CNN disagrees
False. Your article is nearly a year old. Has CNN defended Boebert’s version of events lately?
“CNN could neither immediately confirm nor immediately debunk”
“the super PAC stands by “the major thrust of the information” that went viral on Twitter last week”
Which is better than Trump typically does or FOX News
Still waiting for any concrete verifiable evidence of the claims of this thread.
It’s just as concrete and verifiable as your claims about Hunter Biden, LCpl
-->
@TWS1405_2
For Bud light drinkers, people are guilty until proven innocent.
Let’s not forget about this bimbo in Congress just because Trump was found guilty
Stolen valor stewardess got caught playing flappy bird again instead of handing out peanuts.
Should mean plenty of time to help burn his town down when Trumplestiltskin wins again.
found guilty...
In a civil suit, guilt is not the appropriate term, as civil cases do not involve criminal charges. Instead, the court will determine whether the defendant is liable for the harm alleged by the plaintiff, based on a preponderance of the evidence. If the plaintiff is able to prove that it is more likely than not that the defendant caused the harm, the defendant may be found liable and ordered to pay damages. Liable and guilt are 2 separate legal terms.
In a civil suit, guilt is not the appropriate term, as civil cases do not involve criminal charges
That’s like saying you are unsuccessful instead of a loser. Either way, you’re still a loser.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
...Either way, you’re still a loser...
There truly a ' looser ' even when they are successful at making lots of money, and dont grasp that being successful and making lots of money, does not still make a person in a ' looser ' in many other respect.
I personally thank iwantroosevelt and oramagi for their success in pointing out the many flaws of so many conservative right-wingers, time and time again, over and over repeatedly. Kudos to both of you.
I read that the fruit-cake DeSantos finally got criminally charged today.
-->
@ebuc
' looser '
Orange brains are very loose.