Sex imbalances in hours contributed to the household

It's honestly because stay at home moms are that way out of a sense of nobility and stay at home dads are in general lazy pieces of shit. 

I would presume that where men are stay-at-home dads, women are earning an inordinate amount of money.

How are felons treated in the job market in Ireland?

It also should be noted that daycare is about $500 a week here and that is almost exactly the income you will get from a low paying job, canceling your entire paycheck

I would presume that where men are stay-at-home dads, women are earning an inordinate amount of money. Really uninteresting question. 

It's honestly because stay at home moms are that way out of a sense of nobility and stay at home dads are in general lazy pieces of shit. 

It's certainly plausible that this is the case, but how do you know this?

For one your data bares it out.

We also know that your typical stay at home dad is a guy that thinks jobs are beneath him. "I have a PHD, I can't accept a factory job" so you have real long gaps of unemployment for people unwilling to just do whatever the fuck it takes to feed their children. I am a man, if I have to rob a bank to get my kid fed, it's going to happen.

The other type is some lazy guy unwilling to work, less qualified than the above but same general reasoning. 

I will tell you there are exceptions though. The woman who is working 2 jobs to put her man through medical school. That's her supporting her man and it means she can retire in 8 years and live a nice lifestyle. 

I also personally had a situation where I quit a job on impulse and when[...]

A woman asks her man to quit his job and take care of the kids so they can move to a new area and she can accept the new job offer for 6 figures. The man does this.

What happens is she'll lose respect for him because he doesn't make as much as her (income of partner is a trait only women care about). She'll start treating him like shit and then she will cheat or leave him for another man. That stay at home dad did what was right for his family but was naive and now has likely permanently damaged his income potential. 

Either they aren't the bread winners because they are lazy bitches or they aren't the bread winners in the relationship because they are henpecked, and emasculated losers. It isn't their fault but they need to correct the situation.

Anyone who says "both parents should be working" is an idiot.

If both parents work, then who raises kids? Babysitter? Yeah, great thinking, really.

Honestly, the stupidity of today's people is beyond belief. Thats why this society cant survive.

This might be the case for some families, but there is nothing to suggest it is the case for all.

This also doesn't address many of the questions I raised in the OP:

- Why are stay-at-home dads working considerably less than breadwinner mothers, relative to all the other possible set-ups? To be clear, when I say "working", I don't just mean going to a job but also work involving the house (e.g. gardening, cleaning etc.)

- Are the women in these arrangements okay with this?

- Are men okay with working more than women in every other set-up?

There are plenty of questions raised that have interesting nuance. If you want to consider that "really uninteresting", then you're entitled to your opinion.

This might be the case for some families, but there is nothing to suggest it is the case for all.

And nothing to suggest it isn't. 

This also doesn't address many of the questions I raised in the OP:

- Why are stay-at-home dads working considerably less than breadwinner mothers, relative to all the other possible set-ups? To be clear, when I say "working", I don't just mean going to a job but also work involving the house (e.g. gardening, cleaning etc.)

- Are the women in these arrangements okay with this?

- Are men okay with working more than women in every other set-up?

There are plenty of questions raised that have interesting nuance. If you want to consider that "really uninteresting", then you're entitled to your opinion.

Actually it answers every single one of those questions. Money buys leisure time.

(Question) "Are the women in these arrangements okay with this?" (Answer) "Money buys leisure time." --- that doesn't make sense.

(Question) "Are men okay with working more than women in every other set-up?" (Answer) "Money buys leisure time." --- that doesn't make sense.

Actually it answers every single one of those questions. Money buys leisure time.

(Question) "Are the women in these arrangements okay with this?" (Answer) "Money buys leisure time." --- that doesn't make sense.

Actually the question doesn't make sense.

It's a data point with zero context. You expect me to answer if the women are okay with the arrangement knowing nothing of the particulars of the arrangement besides what you have presented?

(Question) "Are men okay with working more than women in every other set-up?" (Answer) "Money buys leisure time." --- that doesn't make sense.

No, I'm mortally offended by these charts you've presented. You've found an outlier and made a thread on it, but have done nothing to explain it. All I'm left with is to get offended at bar charts.

I expect it takes a higher threshold of earning for men to allow women to be sole breadwinner. That's more or less uninteresting. 

So the natural female role is conducive to the modern breadwinning role in relation to modern family values and breeding patterns.

So perhaps under the guise of feminism and equality etc, we are actually just continuing to mirror base instinct.

The how did you answer a question you thought didn't make sense?

*thinking emoji*

The data point is part of the context. The extrapolation on the data point is insufficient to reach a deductive conclusion; nonetheless, the data raises the question. That's why the question is interesting: it's currently unanswered by the data I presented, but it's worth knowing the answer.

I *can't* explain it with the data I have. That's why I'm asking the questions, you dingus.

You're just guessing. Anyone can do that. Anyone can come up with anything doing that.

Talk about uninteresting.

The how did you answer a question you thought didn't make sense?

*thinking emoji*

Juvenile.

The data point is part of the context. The extrapolation on the data point is insufficient to reach a deductive conclusion; nonetheless, the data raises the question. That's why the question is interesting: it's currently unanswered by the data I presented, but it's worth knowing the answer.

And how am I supposed to answer it?

I *can't* explain it with the data I have. That's why I'm asking the questions, you dingus.

So it's a dumb thread. 

You're just guessing. Anyone can do that. Anyone can come up with anything doing that.

Talk about uninteresting.

What else were you possible expecting? Yes, talk about uninteresting. 

The richer man represents the Alpha-Male.

Based on other data you've found? Polling results?

I'm asking because I don't know myself.

Based on other data you've found? Polling results?

I'm asking because I don't know myself.

You're asking a question about women in poll, the particulars of whose circumstances we know nothing. 

Repeat poll the women. All the rest of us can do is guess. I provided my guess.

Oh in that case I actually have the sister poll of this poll where the particulars of these women's circumstances are probed into. Let me dig that out for you. 

Still beats providing girlfriend experience for incels on the internet. There's a reality in there for one of us.

I love my girlfriend very much though. She's a sweetheart.