TRUMP INDICTED!

Author: Sidewalker

Posts

Total: 231
#31
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@SkepticalOne
I am just asking really a simple question to you guys. How important is it for you to never have to worry about Trump again. If ignoring Trump is the only way to truly get rid of him, why isn't that important to you?


#32
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@Greyparrot
I grant there are quite a few government representatives that deserve something similar, but there is also a long list of defendants and convicts already. Trump is not being held to a higher standard - just the same one as you and me.

That's how it should be.
#33
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@Greyparrot
How important is it for you to never have to worry about Trump again
I don't worry about Trump. It is simply a matter of cause and effect. If he (or anyone) committed a crime (which it appears he did), then he (or anyone) should face the consequences. 
#34
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@FLRW
Actually, porn actor Stormy Daniels maintains that she had sex with Donald Trump in 2006. Daniels said a letter she signed under pressure in 2018, claiming the affair “never happened,” was a “lie.” But some conservatives are misleadingly citing that letter as proof that Trump and Daniels were never intimate and she was not paid “hush money.”
lol you could work for the propaganda arm of the left-tribe known as the "mainstream media" by some. What a spin, but "actually" what I said was perfectly accurate. She did deny it.

Trump = constant as the northern star (in this context)
Daniels = flipflop twice, but signed her name under a denial

To left tribers Trump's word means nothing. Don't give a shit, daniels has no credibility. She couldn't even keep to her blackmail deal.

Where is double R, what do you say double R are people more reliable when writing signed letters? Is this about right for your algorithm:

float checkReliability(bool hurts_right_tribe)
{
      If (hurts_right_tribe)
          return 0.95f;
     else
          return 0.15f;
}

#35
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@SkepticalOne
So you're willing to risk Trump as the next president to preserve the rule of law? I don't see this as a win.

The law can recover.

The country may not.
#36
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@SkepticalOne
If he (or anyone) committed a crime (which it appears he did)
You must also subscribe to Double_R's algorithm to believe Trump thought he was yielding to blackmail by paying his own lawyer despite the lawyer's lawyer writing letters admitting that Trump didn't know. You must be sick with TDS to even believe there is such a crime as "campaign hushmoney forgery"

Rhetorical fluff:

From a great distance this persistent warping of the rational faculty that has been programmed into people like you might be fascinating. Unfortunately since you're free on this planet it's more frightening than fascinating.

You and Sam Harris are exactly the kind of zombies that make up NYC and DC juries. There can be no justice with you, you can't even be trusted to see the most obvious facts or care about them.
#37
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@Greyparrot
So you're willing to risk Trump as the next president to preserve the rule of law?
I don't see a huge risk in Trump being the next president...
#38
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Lol, you believe trump is innocent while also making excuses for why he might be found guilty. 

I think you've covered all the bases there! 😆
#39
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@SkepticalOne
Well I can't afford to ignore the polls that say otherwise.
#40
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@SkepticalOne
Lol, you believe trump is innocent while also making excuses for why he might be found guilty. 

I think you've covered all the bases there! 😆
You say it like it's an error on my part. If Donald Trump was charged with criminal fraud for buying a big mac on the moon I can simultaneously claim:

1.) That's impossible
2.) It's not a crime
3.) There are people out there (especially in New York) who would find him guilty of "criminal fraudulent lunar burger purchase"

The fact that there is no scenario in which this is justified regardless of the evidence is an enormous red flag blotting out the sun, but you think it's funny that I point it out.

Mean while actual crimes of democrats are ignored (like Biden selling US foreign policy), sad, but what can I do? You have been given every warning possible. You will still act surprised when it comes to blood.
#41
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,603
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
The 45th president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, has officially been "INDICATED."
Well, at least that's what he said in a rant on his social media platform, Truth Social.
What Trump really means is that he's been "indicted."
Should someone with an IQ of 73 really be President?
#42
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
The only reason the left never suggests divorce is because they know what happens to leftist countries sub consciously.
I would love a divorce from red states. The red states are essentially welfare states, unable to earn an income and support themselves. Most of the taxes collected come from blue states like California and the northeast 

#43
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
#44
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
I would love a divorce from red states. The red states are essentially welfare states
Easy peazy. Go live in Venezuela. They have the policies of Democrats without the right slowing them down
#45
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@SkepticalOne
If you really thought the law worked and was fair, John Edwards would be in prison right now on the same exact charges.
#46
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Don't respond to him please...ty
#47
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@FLRW
The 45th president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, has officially been "INDICATED."
Well, at least that's what he said in a rant on his social media platform, Truth Social.
What Trump really means is that he's been "indicted."
Should someone with an IQ of 73 really be President?
The double standard appears everywhere, it is the new law of our time. Biden doesn't write his own tweets, and his speech is a good indication of why.

Obvious autocorrect and you think you've evaluated IQ.
#48
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 1,999
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Indictment is basically just impeachment in likelihood of leading to jail time. I don't know why these people keep getting excited about it.
#49
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@Greyparrot
I think the rule of law works in principle. I don't think it is perfect. Besides, my view of jurisprudence has nothing to do with John Edwards' legal path.  That's a non sequitor.
#50
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@Savant
Indictment is basically just impeachment in likelihood of leading to jail time. I don't know why these people keep getting excited about it.
I would tend to agree. I think some folks are overly excited. Indictment is not the same thing as conviction. Trump still has to be shown guilty.
#51
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FLRW
@ADreamOfLiberty
Just wondering, how do you auto correct...

trunalimunumaprzure

 Asufutimaehaehfutbw



#52
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@SkepticalOne
Maybe you are not familiar with John Edwards, but all the campaign finance charges were dropped the moment he agreed not to run again.

Trump is the antithesis of Edwards, Trump is running on an anti-swamp agenda, so Trump is more likely to run not less. It's just so baffling why people continue to fall for his game after 7 years.
#53
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You say it like it's an error on my part.
Not at all! You've made it so you can't be wrong. 'Trump is innocent and he might be convicted.'  Brilliant. 
#54
b9_ntt
b9_ntt's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 276
0
2
5
b9_ntt's avatar
b9_ntt
0
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I'm talking about the violations of the constitution Lincoln did to win the war he started.
The South started the war with the attack on Fort Sumter.
Before that, Lincoln was considering not fighting secession.

#55
b9_ntt
b9_ntt's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 276
0
2
5
b9_ntt's avatar
b9_ntt
0
2
5
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Do you think the government was right to enforce laws allowing slavery?
It's not the same "the government" now as the ones that enforced slavery. There is no comparable law now.
Right-wing claims of tyranny about mask and vaccine mandates are less than convincing. They need something much stronger to justify civil war.

#56
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,170
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
Is this where we all sigh and think Trump is finished? What's that saying, oh ya, "You can get a jury to  indict a ham sandwich" Without a conviction an indictment is meaningless. 
#57
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,170
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
-->
@FLRW
I could not find a reliable source for Trumps IQ. I did find your claim of 73. You really gonna go with that? Best guess is between 130 and 140 based on entrance exams to Wharton. But he didn't take the entrance Exam but rather transferred his junior year in collage. He did graduate so the claim of a 73 IQ is well, preposterous.
#58
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Greyparrot
Just wondering, how do you auto correct...

trunalimunumaprzure

 Asufutimaehaehfutbw
Even ChatGPT doesn't know...

#59
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,978
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@sadolite
He might be claiming Trump has advanced dementia almost as bad as the current president even though he was smart 40 years ago.
#60
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Don't respond to him please...ty
Okay sorry. It is so tempting though