Let's save the time and private chitchat
If we debate topic 3, I want this changed:
- The rise of social media as a primary source of news distribution does more harm than good.
to this:
- The rise of social media as a primary source of news distribution has thus far done more harm than good to society.
Without that, consider topic 3 invalid by me and if Tejretics insists on such a faulty resolution topic, I will insist to take Con and Kritik it along the lines you cannot really argue that a past rise itself currently does something in terms of weighed harm and good, only that the thing itself (social media) being used itself is doing more harm than good. We also need the 'to society' otherwise we can drown either side out in freak cases of anecdotal horror vs heartwarming phenomenal prowess of what social media has made happen.
I will hint you this;
- Governments should impose a BBC-style impartiality requirement on all news platforms.
I want Con on this because 'news' currently includes completely tabloid magazines and as another topic points out social media style articles.
I will negotiate hardball if you blackmail us to the roulette because I don't want it to go there.
- The media should be prohibited from reporting on the mental illnesses of those charged with crimes.
I am flexible on this due to the ability for it to be very open to both sides wrestling, I'd enjoy the full 10k chars per Round for this.
This is my favourite of the three topics and needs to be delicately handled by both of us, regardless of side. Let's make a debate we're both proud of.
Please be reasonable and do not force us into the roulette, I have made clear offers. If I were in your shoes, I'd go for topic 2 unless I really wanted to be Pro for topic 1 or 3. If you go topic 3, I will Kritik you into the ground and play very nitpicky as that is the optimal play for Con there.