So how do you know he's wrong? In other words, how do you condemn his position as incorrect when you raise the same objection? Seems like he's studied it quite a bit to me. Maybe he even speaks Hebrew, which would definitely put him closer to the orignial text than a translated manuscript that you picked on personal preference. A preference, by the way, which rests largely on the words that you are reading, and not on accuracy.
It's the same teachings and words, whether you want to believe it or not.
Well, one way is by reading in the hebrew and not in a translation, but your question can be applied to your position -- how do YOU know? You say that they all "say the same thing" but they don't. The Hebrew, by the way, is not vague and one does not need a microscope to see that. You introduced the "Many young woman could be virgins" so the looking through a microscope to explore possibilities is yours.
I know because I listen to God. Whether you want to believe it or not, I do.
I read the Bible every day, and know what it means. Some scriptures' even scholars don't understand though, so I have yet to understand if some verses represent something, or are a metaphor for other things.
Your claim was that all the versions say the same thing, that they "don't mean anything different" so you are saying that "great whales" and "dragons" mean the same thing. Is that an accurate restatement of your position?
Nope, this verse was to represent great creatures of the sea. Not the same creatures. Tell me, is the bible falsified for naming two different creatures in different translations? It has the same message, and both existed.