AND I speak proper English, as all Americans should (to include those who emigrate here should as well)
If you had even the remotest genuine concern,
you would research what hate speech laws are and what other developed nations than US have already succeeded to result in severe fines, not just social isolation and career loss.
You didn't bother searching how enforcement against cultural appropriation occurs.
You are lazy and just here to gaslight and ridicule.
AND I speak proper English, as all Americans should (to include those who emigrate here should as well)Then why are you so butthurt that some girl doesn't think should speak slang?
You are missing a lot!!!! Namely, this is DART, a place to have debates and discussions. This topic, like every other topic, is proffered for discussion. No one is butthurt over anything.
Well, maybe except you, obviously, because others like to have actual debates and discussions at DART,
so you’re belittling them/us for doing so
Black people would be lynched for this. And it had nothing to do with the government. It was white supremacists in the south who hated the fact that black people are equal to them.
Do I have to repeat myself. I said "trying" not "is"
Because this girl expressed her opinion in a video.
This has nothing to do with the conversation.
We’re talking about whether the actions and/or aspirations of a political movement align with the constitution. Of course any group who does not acknowledge its basic principals will not align themselves with it.
You claim to want to protect free speech, but it is only your personal freedom of speech you want to protect and of those who agree with you. When the rest of us speak out against your views, and that public outcry amounts to enough pressure that companies determine it is in their best interest to ban you, that is not an attack on free speech. That is two sides both expressing their views, and one side winning the battle decisively. If you are bothered by this then then the solution is to be more persuasive. If you can’t, then either you are wrong or the rest of society is wrong. Either way, your views within this society will be detrimental to you because it does not align with what the society you live within considers acceptable.
The only thing that can defeat this phenomenon is an authority powerful enough to silence the majority of voices within the society it holds power over. We decided a long time ago that this outcome was not acceptable, which is why the government cannot interfere with what society considers acceptable speech.
Nothing “the left” is doing violates any of this, so your assertion that the left is trying to become that authority is pure fiction.
Fair point, but then again you can have your own views, but when your (and a number of others) view is to ban certain people from saying certain things, then that ties into free speech.
Again, government censorship using the media is one way the left is doing this.
Double_R never watches videos linked to, either as evidence for (support of) an argument or to even begin a discussion as I did here.
What is there to discuss? Poor diction is poor diction. Only a delusional fool would try to normalize it.
Using the term “Free speech” in any context that doesn’t involve the government is meaningless and ultimately disingenuous.
It doesn’t tie into free speech, because I just explained that the government is the only authority that can stop you from having the ability to express your views.
No one owes you a platform and your views are not being silenced, the problem is that no one wants to hear what you have to say. And it is the right of the rest of society to decide they do not want to hear it.
Can you please explain what in earth you are talking about?
government censorship using the media is one way the government is trying to silence opposing views and is tied to the democratic party.
Maybe the government won't ban your speech but if everyone disagrees with engaging in debating your ideals, it's as good as having no free speech.
Yes.........and the government is run by voting........by the people. What are you not understanding about this?
You literally just contradicted yourself. People not hearing what you have to say, is silencing you.
government censorship using the media is one way the government is trying to silence opposing views and is tied to the democratic party.
The point of this discussion is to debate its principals. Your entire case to this point is to argue that the left is violating free speech which leads to the conclusion that the left is willing to do away with the constitution. But what you are calling free speech is not constitutional, at all. So your conclusion isn’t just erroneous, it’s completely backwards. It’s the right that has demonstrated a disregard for the actual principals of the constitution, so if anything it’s the right that should be the concern.
It means no one individual or entity is silencing you. Facebook does not get to decide whether you have a platform on Twitter.If no one out there wants to hear what you have to say, then that is a decision made by society itself. And guess what… society does get to choose. That’s what free speech means, because if everyone has the right to free speech then everyone gets a say in what speech they consider acceptable. Everyone gets a say in whether they want to be subjected to your views. And if everyone decides they do not want to hear what you have to say, then you still get to say it, but no one has to listen. No one has to read it. No one has to hear it. That’s a collective choice everyone has.Once again; society does not owe you a platform. What is so difficult about this?
Provide one example of the government “using the media” to silence opposing views.
Not arguing this is an example of a violation of free speech. I said it could lead to it.
Perfect. So you admit that the people who are saying white people cant say this or that are wrong, because I'm allowed to say it, but they don't have to listen. I agree with that. But I still have the God given right to say it.
Twitter Files from Elon Musk.
Provide one example of the government “using the media” to silence opposing views.Twitter Files from Elon Musk.The Twitter files did not show anything you are claiming it did.
