How is conceding victory to the other side not the same as dropping out?
Ramshutu has been a completely belligerent liar and abuser about me during most of his time here, until he decided to quit outside of elections with years of only posting 2 bursty moments in between.There is a reason he did not disagree with anything I said to Lancelot about his (Ramshutu's) narrative being a lie.
Wylted will be fair to all.
That is a claim disguised as a question. Again, in the real world, concessions carry no legal weight. A candidate can concede AND be voted into office because only the vote counts.
Are you confident in your occupation as the possible president?I doubt so, because of the existence of this thread. If you did not see RM as an opposing force, you would not be inclined to have these "pledges"
I doubt so, because of the existence of this thread. If you did not see RM as an opposing force, you would not be inclined to have these "pledges"
He who doesn't respect democracy, has no right to speak in the name of democracy.
Im changing my decision, I would like to draw my name out from the pledge please..
So wanting a fair, audited, vote is a threat against the democratic process?
That sounds like equity rather than equality
A pledge is only effective if people have permanently committed to it. It's not a petition.
Yes, I take the threat against the Democratic process very seriously.
I can't hold him to it, but he accepted that pledge in front of God.
It depends what you said. If you said threats I would not veto it, I could still veto the time and get to the root of the dispute.
I am very perceptive psychologically because I learned, having been autistic/aspergers and lagging in social skills, to manually gain reading ability of people. Even online. I have watched documentaries, read books and all sorts to refine my ability to truly perceive and understand people emotionally as they are, not as I wish they were or as I presume them to be.
I am that freak who reads body language like a machine. I am very perceptive. If you had lashed out at another user, it would not occur to me to assume you had nothing bad happening irl or no reason to do it.
I understand anger, all too well. I would chat with you and the other party individually and liaison with the mods to achieve an actual mutual apology, resolution and things you think are not even possible over text I would achieve.
I have a healing way about me, you do not realise it but it exists and I also have an aggressive, assertive way about me and that gets more noticed. I can handle situations with severe finesse, to the point the mods and even the toxic users would go damn RM how did you do that but I need the actual authority or people like polytheist witch just say get lost even when I truly am advocating their case and trying hard to understand what caused them anger, since I am not a mod and useless in their eyes.
That is why I wanted the title of president, I could get more to talk and properly make the mods take me serious when I say dont try route A, try route B. They are starting to see my wisdom. I told whuteflame both that Shila would be a chronic toxic voter he should have instantly been harsh with to reform her and was proven right and that she was no way in hell a bot and was proven right. I have had other instances like that. The mods trust me. You just do not see it
I don't think it is responsible to give someone the power to help decide perm bans that holds grudges and is against freedom of speech.
Do you have an example of RM's alleged opposition of "freedom of speech"?
Who does RM hold grudges against?
