-->
@Barney
I think you're argument being predicated in respect within the workspace is pragmatic, but it doesn't actually defend the cogency of the principle, or even posit it's necessity. Take for example, if society were to transition into the norm of allowing individuals to be designated their own adjectives. The argument you are running will can defend such a scenario - it takes literally nothing to assign an individual a given adjective, yet the feasibility of an initiative does not actually bolster it's credibility nor necessity. I agree with you to the extent that I would call someone whatever gender they want, but internally, I believe this entire notion is bs.
Bottom line is this - would you agree that the plethora of neo-pronouns, identified through the 57 or however many genders their are now, are fundamentally unproductive, although you still use them purely from a place of virtue?