DART should stop banning people

Author: rbelivb

Posts

Total: 54
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 182
Posts: 807
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
-->
@RationalMadman
How do you vote or run for President? 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
to run you'd need to ask to delete the 'vote for RM' thread or actually it won't matter as it seems they aren't enforcing that (at least close this thread by mod assistance) and have 1 thread (not 3, like Wylted) about your presidency, what you offer and all of that.

The rule is 1 thread about your presidency, period. Others are allowed to make their own threads if they support another though.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
to vote, wait until the voting period.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,185
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@RationalMadman
If I know I'm going to be gone during the voting period, can I cast a vote in advance?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@AustinL0926
I genuinely don't know. Supadudz is in charge this time it seems but whiteflame is definitely an authority though it seems all the mods are chilling for today at least to me.
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,447
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
Regarding Poly:
I should mention that they requested being banned.
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
Are you perhaps talking about my comments on debates regarding whether people should vote who? No, that is just a comment on how poorly-worded the topic is.
rbelivb
rbelivb's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 210
1
2
5
rbelivb's avatar
rbelivb
1
2
5
-->
@Barney
Maybe I would call it a challenge more than a request, but I take your point.

Falsely accusing the mods of allowing death threats is wrong, but I don't think she needed to be banned.
rbelivb
rbelivb's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 210
1
2
5
rbelivb's avatar
rbelivb
1
2
5
-->
@badger
I would ban Best.Korea and Shila within seconds of having been given that power. 
Anything to do with p*do stuff is probably one topic that should be banned.
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@rbelivb
Best.korea has a reason to be banned, general trolling, not pedo stuff.

His views throughout topics have been so vastly inconsistent with each other that the motives are probably to annoy people generally. If anything, that is a better reason for the ban. 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 352
Posts: 10,338
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Intelligence_06
His views throughout topics have been so vastly inconsistent with each other
Did Best.Korea hurt you so badly? Oh no, poor you. You are feeling bad. Lets cry 🥺
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@Barney
We're they banned for the following a post of yours a few before that

If the claim is true, offer details so that whomever it was may be banned. Otherwise we'll be left with the conclusion you're lying as a desperate plea for attention.

Is lying and being an attention whore suddenly a bannable offense? 
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
She thought the threat shouldn't be ban worthy or she thought it wasn't direct enough to prove her case. Perhaps she didn't feel like searching for hours through post history to prove some rando made a threat that they are very unlikely to follow through on and that a mod banning the individual would be an overreaction. 

I have received threats I haven't reported. Mostly on DDO. It's not a big deal. On Facebook, Twitter etc. I receive death threats like once a week. I don't report them. I barely acknowledge them. It's really no big deal
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Best.Korea
Quite opposite. Your activities literally make you look as if you want to be beaten up. At least that is how I see it.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 352
Posts: 10,338
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Intelligence_06
"Your activities literally make you look as if you want to be beaten up."

Is this because I called you a Chinese volunteer?

I dont know if you knew this or not, but beating up your computer screen does not hurt the person on the other side 😜
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,618
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@rbelivb
In my opinion, this site cannot be interesting without a healthy contingent of extremely unpleasant people on it. 
Don't worry, there are still plenty of extremely unpleasant people here. 
rbelivb
rbelivb's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 210
1
2
5
rbelivb's avatar
rbelivb
1
2
5
-->
@Barney
@PREZ-HILTON
Just for reference, here are some posts from Shila directed toward Polytheist-Witch. Seems like this is what she was talking about:

Christians burnt witches. Turning atheists against witches too is one way to keep the flames alive.

Exodus 22:18 8 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.

Proves burning of witches was universal. Even the Jews under Moses were ordered to do so.

Your death wish is becoming more apparent. That is why you are on a Religion Forum full of Catholic converts.

From your title you declare you are a witch in many religions. Is that to improve your chances of getting burnt?

--> @Shila
Polytheist-Witch: Nobody wants to read seven paragraphs of stupid bullshit, especially if it's just God damn Bible quotes.

It will take a few chapters of the Bible to burn a witch.

Witches were burnt. Inviting witches to investigate other religions, Gods or spiritual concepts would be the lowest point in human development.

Polytheist-Witch: Threatening members with death could result in banning.

No church would excommunicate it’s members for burning a witch.
The Bible approves it.

Exodus 22:18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.


Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,447
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
We're they banned for the following a post of yours a few before that

If the claim is true, offer details so that whomever it was may be banned. Otherwise we'll be left with the conclusion you're lying as a desperate plea for attention.

Is lying and being an attention whore suddenly a bannable offense? 
They were banned after that, but not for just that lone incident.

And due to the severity of the lies about other users, yes. More and more frequently her go to on losing any discussion, was to accuse the other person of being a podophile whom is specifically targeting her children.
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@Barney
  • And due to the severity of the lies about other users, 
That sounds like a subjective judgement. 
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,447
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
She was given plenty of chances to present evidence, and not only refused but responded with pure toxicity. While at the same time demanding moderators do something...
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@Barney
It sounds self contradictory on her part. It shouldn't be bannable to be a bitch, but I can understand the frustration on your part. 
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 182
Posts: 807
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
Low-IQ morons like Polytheistic Witch and Mesmer are precisely the reason why this site deserves dedicated trolls like Wylted and Best.Korea. 
Hopefully, the latter two remain on the platform and continue to recklessly wreak havoc wherever they go. 
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
The only person I would care to have banned would be BrotherDThomas. There are plenty other right wing or christians on the site who still manage to have mostly civil discussions, but his condescension, hypocrisy, etc., are particularly annoying.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,993
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@K_Michael
Bro D is good fun.

I don't think that you quite get him.


Poly is also good fun.


Wanting to ban people when you can simply ignore them, is a sign of insecurity.