Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.

Author: YouFound_Lxam

Posts

Total: 181
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
You wouldn’t know what the truth is even if it came Up barking and hit you on the ass. Stop listening to Novice_II’s piss poor advice. He’s a whiner. Now you’re whining just like he always does. 

Not wanting to debate you for obvious fact based reasons are not fucking excuses. It’s reality. Like your sophomoric questions about vaginas and what they do or don’t designate. 

Every time you open your mouth and post you keep proving my point. You need to educate yourself more on the subject before trying to engage others. On this topic and the God one too. 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
No, you need to learn to not dodge arguments. 
You obviously need to work on that.
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
LoL!! 

You’re such an incel poster child for the Dunning Kruger effect it’s beyond belief. 

Grow up and better educate yourself. First thing you should do is take a philosophy course and learn how to debate and research topics better. Then work on grammar. 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Thats the whole point I'm on this website, is to improve my grammar skills, and debating skills. 
But that is not taking place here.
This is just you are dodging question after question.
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
No, you come to A site like this with at a minimum standard grammar skills, not subpar skills. That way people can understand you better. 

Next you don’t come Here to Learn to debate, you go to school for that. Debate club. Philosophy courses. English classes with focus on writing essays. 

Coming here wet behind the ears doesn’t help at all. 
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I’ve answered all the legit questions. 

I’ve ignored the sophomorically banal questions. 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@TWS1405
sophomoric banal boom boom
incel, dunning-kruger zoom zoom
sophomoric train wreck doom doom
PS, I’m not even going to dignify you vagina comment to human crap.
womb womb
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
Yawn 🥱 
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Same mindset if you're too stupid to understand don't be on a f****** debate site.
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
 These are the same men that sterilized Native American women without telling them. 
Ummm...all of those men are dead.
The event polytheist was referring to took place in the 70s, so those doctors are about my grandparent's age. Some may be dead, but a reasonable amount of them are still out there.
 Those then male dominated fields decided to use it as a way to control and subjugate women.
The field of modern medicine disenfranchised female midwifes, who practiced birth and pregnancy health before men decided to step in. Ignaz Semmelweis was the first to notice that going straight from autopsy lectures to delivering babies was having an effect on maternal and infant mortality. Before handwashing was finally adopted having a baby in a hospital was actually more dangerous than at home with a midwife.


Does the vagina of a woman dictate what a living human is?
Definitely. And since I was born via emergency C-section, I am not a human. /s

YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
I’ve answered all the legit questions. 

I’ve ignored the sophomorically banal questions. 
No, you've just ignored my questions. 

You can't use, you are being older and wiser as an argument. Thats just not how it works.

There are a lot of older people, who are way smarter, and have gone to school way longer, and still are stupid and can't grasp basic concepts.

TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
There are a lot of older people, who are way smarter, and have gone to school way longer, and still are stupid and can't grasp basic concepts.
Says the twit who couldn't and still doesn't grasp the terms "born," "birthed," "fetal viability," "personal autonomy," and confuses cellular life with personhood. 
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I’ve answered all the legit questions. 

I’ve ignored the sophomorically banal questions. 
No, you've just ignored my questions. 

Here goes:

Your question:
So, you believe that a living human isn't a, well, living human when it is in the womb?

Your question/statement:
"Baby: a very young child, especially one newly or recently born."

Your question/statement:
At what point is it morally wrong to kill a living human in the womb.

Your question/Statement:
Well miscarriage isn't abortion.

Your nonsensical post #32


Your question/statement:
In response to my post:
A lump of coal isn’t [a] Diamond. 
An acorn is not an oak tree. 
A block of wood isn’t charcoal (burnt wood). 
So on and so forth. 
Same could be said about sperm, or the female's egg, but when natural processes occur, then all of these transformations can happen.

I can keep going if you like? Proving I have responded to any and all legitimate questions and/or ignorant statements that you've proffered. 

Still want to stand by your asinine baseless allegation that I have ignored your queries?

...

Still want to debate this? You will only embarrass yourself as you did here. 
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Yeah, that is what I thought. 
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
What percentage of these anti-choicer's are religious fundamentalist?

What percentage of these anti-choicer's  are non-relgious fruit cakes?

What percentage of these anti-choicer' just along  because they dont want to out of step with their more radical, anti-choicer friends?


YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Still want to debate this? You will only embarrass yourself as you did here. 
Yes, I do, but you keep declining.

YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
t’s not [a] living  human (being) either. 

And don’t be a dick about it either. 

It’s not distressing, it’s fucking annoying when people use the wrong term to describe that which it doesn’t even describe. 

A lump of coal isn’t [a] Diamond. 
An acorn is not an oak tree. 
A block of wood isn’t charcoal (burnt wood). 
So on and so forth. 

Your last statement (er, question) is a strawman. Never said or remotely asserted what you’re misconstruing. 
You are comparing coal and acorns to a human fetus.
Thats not answering the question with facts, that's just comparing it with a nonsensical reply.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Baby: a very young child, especially one newly or recently born.
No it doesn’t. 

Reading comprehension problems? 

“Newly or recently born” = a very young child. 

Birth is the transition between pregnancy to child/baby, not before. 

"a very young child, especially one newly or recently born."

Look for yourself.


YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Birth is the transition between pregnancy to child/baby, not before. 
I responded to this response with the question," Does the vagina of a woman dictate what a living human is?"
And you have yet to respond to that question. 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
I’m both pro-choice and pro-life. 
Pro-choice up to 22 weeks gestation. 
Pro-life after 23 weeks gestation. 
Then after that I asked you the reason, and you replied with fetal viablity.

Then I asked the question:

"A baby is in the womb and will be born into a living breathing human in a couple of months. It is okay to kill the baby if you don't wish to have them in your life.

Well, if you agree with that logic, then you should agree with this too:

An adult human is in a coma and will wake up from the coma in a couple of months. It is okay to kill the adult if you don't wish to have them in your life." 

Then you replied with: 
Nothing
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Your question/Statement:
Well miscarriage isn't abortion.
Yea it is. It’s a “natural” abortion. The females bodily defensive mechanism to keep her safe from potential death. 
Yes, but it isn't done on purpose. It isn't the mother's decision. It is a natural process, though very sad. 




YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Your nonsensical post #32
You can't even reply to that post, because you know I am right. 

Your only response to that is that it is nonsensical.

I am showing the facts and you don't like it.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Eyebrows, hair, testicles or ovaries forming, and/or an immature but albeit functioning underdeveloped organ does NOT = fetal viability. 
Yes, it does, and you know it. 
You just don't want to be proved wrong.

YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Nothing non-living creates those things.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
It is an affirmed FACT that 89-94% of ALL abortions are done BEFORE 14 weeks gestation, the MAJORITY of those being done BEFORE 6 weeks gestation.

Less than 1.3% of ALL abortions are done AFTER 22-24 weeks gestation for very specific legit reasons

That's not how it works, genius! FFS! You have absolutely NO requisite knowledge of this subject to even be engaged in it. In other words, you are an uneducated fool arguing as though you think/believe what you're arguing is truth whereas everyone else is false. That makes you the poster child for the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

If I had no knowledge on the subject, then why are you arguing with me, and getting upset when I make valid points?

POTENTIALITY =/= ACTUALITY!!!
Never has. Never will!!!
It doesn't mean it always will, but there is still a big chance, when you are talking about pregnancy. 
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Young, dumb and clueless beyond belief. 

Your recent comment = The Dunning Kruger Effect to the proverbial “T.” 

I have better things to do than beat a childish dead horse. 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@TWS1405
Your just mad. 
Just make sure not to be a crybaby about it ok?

Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Your just mad. 
Just make sure not to be a crybaby about it ok?
Don't forget, you are walking in women territory, the female of the species is quick to anger, and particularly vicious when provoked, for your own sake, be careful.
Novice_II
Novice_II's avatar
Debates: 98
Posts: 174
2
6
6
Novice_II's avatar
Novice_II
2
6
6
Conversations like in this thread are among the reasons I am pro-life. That is, just seeing pro choicers being utterly incapable of defending their view. 
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Novice_II
People don't see that from conception, human life is intrinsically valuable. 

They just want to argue that it is not, so that they can have the freedom to have sex without boundary's, and kill whatever they don't desire.

If the whole world worked like that, then everyone would be getting rid of everything just for convienience.

They can't just kill a baby just because of their own convenience.