-->
@Lair77
Tbh, I might even rate Madman over Barney. Barney only has like 7 actual debates. The other 30 are trolls, forfeits, grammar arguments or terrible opponents.I'd rather lose to good opponents than rarely face them.
IIRC, Barney had 88 debates on his DDO account (Ragnar). If you add his DDO and Dart accounts together, he's gone well over 100 debates without losing. Even if it's all against no-name noobs (I can't remember, but I'd bet there was the odd harder debater in there), winning all those debates across a bunch of topics is worth something.
Meanwhile, Madman has racked up losses against mediocre and poor debaters. A 67% win ratio is poor, even if he has done many. Danielle had about a 90% win ratio with about the same number of debates, and she seemed to face a similar number of tough opponents. However, people don't even seem to mention Danielle in these recent 'who was the best?' discussions. If she's second rank with that record, then what is Madman with a far inferior one?
So, what do we have? We've got a guy with a flawless record who probably hasn't ever debated a first or second rank debater on either website (IIRC), versus a guy who has lost to various ranks of debaters (albeit he has won a lot more tougher debates than Barney). I'd rather take the guy who hasn't lost or been tested, versus the guy who we know is above average and nothing more.
But yeah if you only saw Barney's account on here, you might be tempted to take Madman.