And I'm curious what "extreme" affirmative action benefits you think they are privy to. I'm more of a merit-based kinda person myself, but there's no way that AA has been more problematic than general nepotism.
I bring it up because I think it cuts into the common narrative that black people are oppressed.
Affirmative action benefits are extremely powerful, although it is true that many people aren't able to take effectively take advantage of them. The bounce an applicant to a college gets for being black is significantly higher than what someone gets for being a legacy, studies have found it's 310 SAT points on the 1600 point scale. Over a lifetime, this represents a grant of hundreds of thousands of dollars (or more!) if the applicant picks the same major they otherwise would have and graduates, that is granted to tens of thousands of people per year--and denied to others--on the basis of race over the course of half a century. For example, the ROI on a degree in economics from Harvard (median SAT score of 1510) is over $1.4 million more than Boston University (median SAT score 1340.) Within major, the prestige of the university matters a lot. Then there are all sorts of programs that make government contracting much much easier if you are a minority owned business. The extent to which all this "makes up" for anything is a different question--but it can't just be dismissed!
If you really think affirmative action benefits aren’t valuable try to imagine a bizarro world where Asian people had these affirmative action benefits instead of facing de-facto quotas at elite schools and elite institutions...they would take over almost immediately. They actually arent small benefits at all
When you say "black culture" promotes crime, what kind of culture are you talking about: rap music that highlights living in the ghetto? What is the origin of ghettos? How and why did poor black people all wind up congregated in the same public housing? Why did so many wind up in jail in the 80s and 90s and how did those parent or fatherless homes impact black youth? Exploring questions like these isn't giving a pass to black criminals, nor is it vilifying white people and suggesting they should pipe down and accept being victims of black crime today. It's simply taking an honest deep dive into history and sociology for a better understanding so we can address it, the same way people want to analyze white supremacists or trumpkins and see why they are the way are. Simply writing off black people as morally inferior (as these conversations always seem to do!) isn't helpful and isn't honest, that's all I'm saying.
What actually causes crime is beyond me but we can make some educated guesses. For example, we know homicide rates spiked in 2020 not following the pandemic but following the George Floyd protests:
https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/what-caused-the-2020-homicide-spike A similar, but much much greater spike, occurred in the 1960s so I think there is decent reason to suspect that all else being equal things like police policy, tough or weak on crime policies, making people feel like victims, huge cultural changes etc all have some sort of impact
I wouldn't be surprised if poverty does have a casual impact on violent crime, but poor hispanic people and poor white people have significantly lower crime rates than even black people in wealthier brackets. In any income bracket propensity to crime follows a similar pattern from greatest to least of black, hispanic, white, and asian. There has to be a strong cultural element (although not rap music) because poor whites seem to harm themselves in response to the same factors that really hurt the black community. The early US was founded as a state for the English diaspora with a handful of other Northern Europeans so it's a weird counterfactual but I would agree that it's totally obvious that if for some reason Africans were brought to the country in the 1700s and immediately treated as full citizens their descendants would be better off today than todays black people. But I don't think that's an excuse for violent crime. The culture can, and should be expected to, change for the better
Also, a full and honest assessment of the causes of group differences would also HAVE to account for genetic differences in things like intelligence and impulse control caused by ~70,000 years of divergent evolution, which even most people on the right aren't interested in doing...and I understand why. It is a little dehumanizing and that kind of knowledge is practically an infohazard if used the wrong way. But it does really bother me that we are supposed to obsess over racial differences while at the same time this elephant in the room that's probably the lurking variable in most group differences is just radioactive. It's better to fight crime, poverty, discrimination, etc in as race blind terms as possible to keep the peace