"Well stated?"
That has to be some of the most incoherent nonsense I have personally observed within this forum.
That has to be some of the most incoherent nonsense I have personally observed within this forum.
That has to be some of the most incoherent nonsense I have personally observed within this forum.
It’s okay to kill things that haven’t breathed for the first time yet
Religious people bad and only think killing bad because they hate women
Only religious people can think killing bad
Quite the thesis pro-choicers have, diabolical virtual murderers
Yes and why would you think otherwise when those things are organism of the pregnant woman, mother to become?Please try and use rational common sense.
Patriarchal bible encourages irrational non-sense in many ways to women in general and we see the results as these anti-choice, perverted virtual rapists sticking their noses in to pregnant womans bodily busness without her consent. Please try put aside your ego based blockages to truth and use some rational common sense.
Why do you continually make irrational nons-sense comments like this? It is because you have ego based mental blockage to truth, a truth that shows your type is a perverted virtual rapist with no compassion, empathy, respect of pregnant women. Sick-n-head.
Best you stick to what I stated and not repeatedly make irrational comments that lack common sense and not what Ive stated
The places that are talking about banning abortion all together are also talking about if a woman leaves the state to go somewhere else she can be charged with a crime because the fetus belongs to that state. They're saying that if a woman has an abortion and somebody knows about it they turn them in so that person can go to jail and then they get money for it. If that's not some Nazi f****** tactics I don't know what is. To say that you agree with that but you're not a Nazi is a lie.
I think that the common sense is with the side that says not to kill a living being in an act that would be considered the most horrific murder if done a few months later.
I have never cited the Bible once for my abortion stances. I don't understand your obsession with trying to tie me to the book. Regardless, even if the book is a mean and "patriarchal" text, that still doesn't mean it is wrong.
Continue showing your type as a sadistic, bloodthirsty, heartless virtual murderer with no compassion, empathy, respect of the unborn
You can repeatedly state that you believe in common sense and that what I say is irrational.
However, I should inform you that it does little to disguise the fact that you have no thorough understanding of what you believe nor the literary skills to even describe such ideas if you possessed the capabilities to form them. Such a disappointing clump of hollow drivel that I had to sully my eyes with.
Please, if you are going to encourage me to spend my time reading responses, make them worthwhile and thoughtful. Don't waste my time with ad hominem attacks on me or religious texts.
All murder is horrific. Again, you and your perverted virtual rapist friends lack the empathy and compassion for a air breathing pregnant woman and only focus and on the the non-air breathing fetus/baby that is and organism of the pregnant woman. Read my lips/text, the non-breathing fetus/baby is not an organism of you or your perverted virtual rapists friends, ergo, keep your friggin nose out of the pregnant womans body. Your a sick-n-head fundamentlist freak from the friggin dark ages.
All murder is horrific.
Because that is where all of this moralistically superior attitude stems from.
And you listen to me, a baby or a woman? Which has lived less of its life and is worse to abuse and/or murder?Stop for a second and think.
Correct, but if you want to codify a constitutional right to bodily autonomy, you also need a constitutional right to the ownership of your fetus.
Personhood doesn't negate self-ownership of another person.
Assuming personhood, the fetus still wouldn't have a right to use the body of another without consent.
The liberty of a mother does not trump a beings right to life.
If people can do what they want with their own bodies then rape and murder are justified.
Codifying the ownership of the fetus is pointless.
It's the only way to legally define a fetus as your body
Bodily autonomy is defined as self-governance and self-determination over one’s own body.By definition then, such a principle could be used to justify murder and rape as I can do what I want with my body according to the bodily autonomy principle.
A right to bodily autonomy would be pointless is it were codified that a woman has unconditional ownership of her fetus.