January 6th Hearings

Author: Double_R

Posts

Total: 655
#451
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
this never happened
So what. That trivial fact does nothing to support your confirmation biased position. There is no need for an arrest warrant when the person is in jail. He was objectively being held for parole violations. This is straight out of your biased wiki article.

Every choice we make has consequences. If you choose to violate parole or steal a bakery truck, you shouldn't expect leniency.
#452
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@ILikePie5

94% of young Democrats hate Biden lol!

It appears as if they have not been distracted enough by the J6 show.
#453
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
this never happened
So what.
why was he released after 700 days WITHOUT making a "plea-deal" and WITHOUT a trial ?
#454
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
why was he released after 700 days WITHOUT making a "plea-deal" and WITHOUT a trial ?
Why does anyone, (not just your cherry picked confirmation biased stooge) who is held on probation violations get released? Have you done more than zero research on the other side of this story? Or are you committed to a broken confirmation bias narrative with no need at all to examine the other side? I used to believe you could see all sides of a story.

The fact that he wasn't ready for the outside world proves the parole board likely released him prematurely.
#455
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
why was he released after 700 days WITHOUT making a "plea-deal" and WITHOUT a trial ?
Why does anyone, (not just your cherry picked confirmation biased stooge) who is held on probation violations get released? Have you done more than zero research on the other side of this story? Or are you committed to a broken confirmation bias narrative with no need at all to examine the other side? I used to believe you could see all sides of a story.
this sounds a lot like, "no reason"
#456
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
this sounds a lot like, "no reason"
This sounds a lot like "I am not interested in the other side of the story."
#457
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
this sounds a lot like, "no reason"
This sounds a lot like "I am not interested in the other side of the story."
i'm stating facts

if you think there's some "other side" to the facts, then tell me exactly what facts you're talking around
#458
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
if you think there's some "other side" to the facts
Unlike you , I don't pretend there is no other side to the narrative.
#459
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
if you think there's some "other side" to the facts
Unlike you , I don't pretend there is no other side to the narrative.
what facts are you specifically referring to ?
#460
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
what facts are you specifically referring to?
I am referring to your narrative that a person being held on parole violations was somehow unfair.
#461
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
what facts are you specifically referring to?
I am referring to your narrative that a person being held on parole violations was somehow unfair.
this is only one example of how someone can be held on charges that the state cannot provide evidence for

even when the state knows they do not have enough evidence to convict, they will try to get people to take a plea-deal (to cover their failure)

and continuously "re-schedule" the "speedy trial" we are all told we all have a right to

the exact same tactics are being used on the j6 participants

i would imagine you'd be somewhat concerned about the $200 a day of tax money this kind of judicial failure costs you ($140,000.00)
#462
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
this is only one example of how someone can be held on charges that the state cannot provide evidence for
Lol, no it is Not. This is actually one example of a person being held on parole violations. Nobody on the Jan6 list of detainees were held on parole violations. The 2 cases are nothing alike.

the exact same tactics are being used on the j6 participants
Nope.
#463
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
This is actually one example of a person being held on parole violations.
citation please
#464
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
citation please
Can you not read your own wiki source? It says it clearly he was held on parole violations.
#465
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Can you not read your own wiki source? It says it clearly he was held on parole violations.
no, no it does not
#466
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
no, no it does not
Okay well then we disagree on English because it clearly states it.
#467
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Greyparrot
I have never seen you take an interest in the other side of your narrative but be my guest and show me your understanding of the other side.
#468
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@RationalMadman
Thanks!
#469
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Greyparrot
point proven
#470
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@coal

J6 show has invited Tim Pool as a guest!
#471
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
citation please
Can you not read your own wiki source? It says it clearly he was held on parole violations.
there is a distinct difference between a "probation violation hold" and a "PENDING probation violation" and what you call "parole violations"

IFF he was convicted of the NEW charges against him, THEN and only then, would that constitute a (single) "parole violations"
IFF he was convicted of the NEW charges against him, THEN and only then, would that constitute a (single) "parole violations"
IFF he was convicted of the NEW charges against him, THEN and only then, would that constitute a (single) "parole violations"

however, he was NOT convicted of the NEW charges, specifically because the state did not have enough evidence to convict him
#472
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
A person being held on parole violations is not unfair.
#473
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL

Look up the May 29th, 2020 riots in front of the White House. In the blocks before the White House, violent rioters, looted and burned everything in sight and headed for the White House gates. The only thing that made this different from January 6th is that unlike Nancy Pelosi, Donald Trump was prepared and had massive amounts of security standing by.

The White House had to use a massive amount of force that night to stop the rioters who were trying to come over the fence. 67 Secret Service officers were wounded and sent to the hospital and the President had to be removed to a secure bunker for safety.

There were times at night when America's capital city descended into chaos, with running battles between rioters and police through the streets.
This was much more violent than January 6th; and if anything should qualify as an "insurrection" seizing the White House would be it. Yet, no investigation, no panel, no commission, no one thrown in jail without bail.

#474
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
A person being held on parole violations is not unfair.
he was NOT "being held on parole violations"

he was denied bail for a POTENTIAL "parole violation" (iff convicted, which he was NOT by the way)
#475
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
...May 29th, 2020 riots...
what makes you think i disagree with you on this point ?
#476
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
 a POTENTIAL 
Nope. I did the research on the actual violations of his parole. It's not in your wiki source though.
#477
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11

Why Isn't There a May 29th Committee Holding Hearings?
Because May 29th, 2020 was a spontaneous reaction to government oppression and malfeasance, the people demanding that government tell the truth, comply with the US constitution, and re-align its values to better accord with American principles of liberty and equality for all.

Jan 6th was a lie told by the highest level officials in the Federal government for the purpose of taking immediate and permanent control of American government in treasonous violation of those officials'  oaths of office to uphold the US Constitution and as a direct assault on American values and liberties.  Jan 6th sought to take power away from the American people and give it to a handful of self-serving despots.

The founding fathers understood that there would be antigovernmental protests and strongly restricted government's capacity to intervene in such.  The founding father also understood that that tyrants would try to take over from time and strongly encouraged the visitation of swift justice on those traitors.

May 29th was pro-American protest against tyranny .  Jan 6th was an anti-American tyrant's incompetent coup.  Loyal Americans have a duty to protect the former and destroy the latter utterly.
#478
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Nope. I did the research on the actual violations of his parole. It's not in your wiki source though.
if his parole was actually violated, then he would be sentenced

this did not happen
#479
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@oromagi
Jan 6th was an anti-American tyrant's incompetent coup.
wow
#480
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,060
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
wow
Well stated.