-->
@ebuc
You don't say anything coherent> Take your last three posts for instance
What is a man or woman?
Posts
Total:
185
-->
@sadolite
You don't say anything coherent> Take your last three posts for instance
When you have logical common sense that invalidates please share.
This topic is about man and woman.
-->
@ebuc
I already responded to it. Not my problem if you don't like my response. Who the hell knows what a man or woman is. You can pretend to be anything you want. Don't even know why the terms are even used anymore.
-->
@sadolite
I already responded to it
Please share when you have something of significant relevance to my comments regarding man and woman, that is logical, common sense. You do not because you have not. Empty rhetoric. No intellectual proclivities that I can discern.
-->
@ebuc
It is your opinion that my response has no intellectual value. The idea that grown adults need to debate what a man or woman is is preposterous. Saying you identify as is the same as saying you are pretending to be. This is where the confusion comes from doesn't it? If society is goin g to be forced to appease peoples delusions then the terms have no meaning. It is my opinion that your responses lack anything at all.
-->
@sadolite
It is my opinion that your responses lack anything at all.
Youve addressed none of my comments with any logical common sense ergo irrelevant and insignificant empty rehetoric. Please share when actually have something valid that is in response to my comments.
-->
@ebuc
I have addressed them. You willfully pretend that the definition of a woman is subjective based on ridiculous woke BS. This says it all in one simple meme
-->
@sadolite
I have addressed them. You willfully pretend that the definition of a woman is subjective based on ridiculous woke BS
False and I think your confusing me with some one else. You need to learn how to comprehend what you read. You have nothing of relevant significance to offer in regards to my statments and that is why you do not post my comments. You have empty rehtoric aka hot air.
-->
@sadolite
DOES GOD HAVE A PENIS ?
YES OR NO
-->
@3RU7AL
DOES GOD HAVE A PENIS ?
Many penis's exist in Universe/God as does many dick-heads aka pricks. No one person is intended with that remark.
Does a local god/universe have a penis to penetrate another vaginally occurring, local god/universe and cause the insemination of something to create a new local universe/god from their inter-actions?
Our Universe/God has no other Universe/God to inter-act with ergo, the motion of God/Universe is only relative to the eternally transforming parts that compose it.
-->
@3RU7AL
There are gods who have been known to have off spring and commit rape. I assume there is a penis involved. But don't really know what the anatomy of non humans would be.
-->
@3RU7AL
I don't believe the creator of the universe and everything in it resembles human form. Does it have a penis like a human? It would be quite strange if it did. Someone once said anything is possible. My answer is both yes and no. Your question comes from a indoctrinated belief system. That god is a man. If god is a man, then yes he has a penis. Everyone knows men have penises and women have vaginas. Only willfully stupid people think otherwise. What you pretend to be in your own mind changes nothing. It just proves you have a mental disorder.
-->
@ebuc
Fishy Story
...ebuc...
There once was sperm in a current, --> __> --> __>
Whose tail whipped around like a turret. ~~~~~~>
It had little mind, ---dumb ass sperm----
Perhaps even blind, ----but nose works great----
Tho onward it swam through the ferment. ---showing those salmon how its done---
It reached the egg, ---knock knock--
Stuck in its head, ---daddys home----
Invagination, makes the world go round,
Imagination, leaves the world behind,
Realization, brings it back again,
United-nations, is one for all,
Divided-nation brings us to a stall.
Earth to Universe, Earth to Universe, our space-ship has stalled out an were going into a tail-spin around the galactic black hole.
-->
@sadolite
If god is a man, then yes he has a penis.
where is god's penis ?
if you haven't seen someone else's genitalia, don't you sort of have to take their word for it ?
why do so many people insist on calling their god a "he" ?
-->
@3RU7AL
Because they're referred to that way in texts and those texts are based on interaction. And for people who haven't read the text it's based on interaction. That's why when you talk to polytheist they often refer to gods as masculine or feminine instead of male or female.
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Because they're referred to that way in texts
so, in other words, you kinda have to take their word for it
-->
@3RU7AL
Unless you have a personal experience that's how information in general works. You don't have to do anything you're allowed to make whatever decision you want just like the people reading the text can make whatever decision they want.
-->
@3RU7AL
What the fuck do I know about the creation of the universe and if there is a god? A penis on a man is half way up his body where the legs connect. A woman has a vagina in the same place. Fucking rocket science.
-->
@sadolite
What the fuck do I know about the creation of the universe and if there is a god? A penis on a man is half way up his body where the legs connect. A woman has a vagina in the same place. Fucking rocket science.
are you going to personally inspect that area every time someone tells you their gender ?
or are you simply going to take them at their word ?
why are you even slightly concerned if you believe someone is "pretending" to be a gender that doesn't match your personal imagination ?
-->
@3RU7AL
Whatever, its rocket science. What would I know.
-->
@sadolite
Just, fucking science.
Only Viagra rockets required.
And given all the sin, ribs and mud shit.
Might suggest a certain asexual deity.
-->
@sadolite
@zedvictor4
Might suggest a certain asexual deity
So in conclusion, no human self-pregnancies, --virgin birth-- but apparrently in a rabbit{?}, Dam wabbits says Elmer Fudd :--))
..." hermaphroditism, the condition of having both male and female reproductive organs. "....
...." However you sort it out, this is a pretty exclusive group — something
like one person in 5,000 is different enough from the standard model to
be considered intersex. "....
..." Abstract. Gonadal
distribution in 409 cases of human true hermaphroditism is reviewed. An
ovary was found on the left side of the body in 62.8% of the cases and
the testis on the right side in 59.5%. The ovotestis is the most common
gonad of the true hermaphrodite; amongst 806 gonads in 406 cases it was
found in 44.3%. ".....
List of intersex people, some of which well known https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_intersex_people
..."Background: There are 11 reported cases of pregnancy in true hermaphrodites, but none with advanced genetic testing.
All known fetuses have been male. Case: A true hermaphrodite with a
spontaneous pregnancy prenatally known to have a remaining portion of a
right ovotestis, delivered a male neonate "...
Case: A true hermaphrodite with a spontaneous pregnancy prenatally known
to have a remaining portion of a right ovotestis, delivered a male
neonate. The mother has a 46, XX karyotype with polymerase chain
reaction demonstrating low levels of the Yq12 sequence. Postpartum
androgen levels were normal.
Conclusion: Partial removal of testicular tissue may enhance fertility in
hermaphrodites, and there may be a genetic basis for the progeny to be
male. "....
...."The person may have XX chromosomes, XY chromosomes, or both.
The external genitals may be ambiguous or may appear to be female or
male. This condition used to be called true hermaphroditism. "...
..."......pregnancies of true hermaphrodites and self-fertilization in
hermaphrodite mammals that have been published in the last 40 years. The
number of hermaphrodite pregnants reported in the literature since 1975
was 14, the number of pregnancies was 26 and the number of healthy born
babies was 20. All of the babies that were born were male.
........The
pregnancy developed following gonadectomy in seven cases (nine
pregnancies). In some cases, either gonadectomy was not performed at all
or it was performed after pregnancy (eight cases, 17 pregnancies).
.......The
karyotype was 46,XX in four of these eight cases that became pregnant
despite in situ ovotestis while it was 46,XX/46,XY in the other four
cases (chimera). In the literature, pregnancy cases that developed
through self-fertilization were not reported in humans. However,
autofertilization was detected in mammalian hermaphrodites such as
domestic rabbit. "....
...." One especially unusual type of intersex person is known as a chimera,
which results when male and female embryos meld together genetically to
form one individual — and if you think you’ve got identity issues in
your garden-variety life, try coming to terms with that. "...
..." Doctors called in to scrutinize the hanging chad, as it were, found Levi
had a mix of sexual equipment but decided he was mostly male. His
ballot was counted and the Whigs won by one vote. On further examination
some days later, though, it was discovered that Levi had been
menstruating for years and sported a set of “well developed mammae”
which the doctors had somehow missed the first time around. ".....
...." The only way I can imagine self-fertilization happening in a human — and
I’m telling you, this one’s a reach — is in a chimerical individual,
formed of two embryos that fused. Would the child of such a person be a
clone? Of course not, nudnik. First, you’d have to duplicate the
genetics of an individual whose makeup was, by definition, an
irreproducible accident.
......Second, the two fused embryos would be
fraternal twins (one’s male and one’s female, right?) and thus have
different genes.
.....Third, the chromosome-level mechanics of sexual
reproduction (surely you remember that fascinating discussion of meiosis
from sophomore biology) would ensure that the genetic deck got a good
honest shuffle. So while the child of an autofertilizing hermaphrodite
would certainly be a close relative of its parent, it’d be a far cry
from a xerox copy. }...
What ever, determining a male from a female is rocket science, what would I know.
-->
@ebuc
What do "YOU" think a woman is? Your own words, no google links, strait from your own brain.
-->
@sadolite
What do "YOU" think a woman is? Your own words, no google links, strait from your own brain.
Womb-man. Howveer some women born without a uterus ergo,
we then revert to X x { compatcted Barr Body }, wherein something is not functioning correctly in one of those two chromosomes, and,
after that, we revert to what whats-their-name points out, --few months back--- larger gamete aka the egg (O) not the sperm ~~~>
Woman ----or hermoprhodite--- is most complex entity of Universe, barring scenarios of two or more women or woman and man etc.
See 2nd post in this LINK to more complex woman
Democrats { broad minded } are more complex than the narrow-minded Republicans.
-->
@secularmerlin
..." We — Stuart Kauffman, Andrew Liddle, Lee Smolin and I — are putting an
end to this. By reformulating cosmological physics to include biological
systems, we have developed a common currency with which their
respective systems can be counted and compared. This ‘currency’ allows
us to quantify the value of biologicals systems when set against the
character cast of cosmology: galaxies, dark energy and black holes. "....
.....Until about 20 years ago, it was thought that black holes, particularly
the supermassive black holes found at the centres of galaxies, were the
dominant contribution to the entropy and possible states of the
universe. Using a formula discovered by Jakob Bekenstein and Stephen
Hawking, Roger Penrose showed that they contribute a staggering
10^(10^101) possible states of the Universe. [The number 10^101 means a
one followed by 101 zeros, and is already a number bigger than the
number of particles within our entire observable Universe.
....But we are
talking about a one followed by 10^101 zeroes!] But even that is dwarfed
by the discovery of dark energy, the putative cause of the Universe’s
present acceleration. This contributes 10^(10^124) to the count of
possible states of the universe. This is the biggest number ever
encountered in the natural world. "....
....Life innovates, creates new niches and possibilities, and interactions,
in ways that cannot be predicted in advance. Unlike in physics, in
biology, the space of possibilities is forever unpredictably expanding.
.....The combinations of just six elements make up most biological
molecules (Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Phosphorus, and Sulphur,
usually known as CHNOPS). We took these chemical elements as the
constituents of the complex system we were modelling. Then we used the
TAP equations to simulate the number of possible configuration states of
the biosphere as it evolved. By the time of the first RNA molecules,
3.5 billion years ago, the number of possible states that the biosphere
could take was: 10^(10^237)
......This is a staggering finding. Recall that the total number of possible states of the universe today is only 10^(10^124). This means that life already surpassed the universe in complexity already 3.5 billion years ago, in the RNA world. As cosmologists we could never, in a billion years, have anticipated that such a number would stem from the evolution of living organisms. It took us three years of calculations, endlessly revising and double-checking our mathematical models, before we can now support the numbers we present today.
-->
@ebuc
You put a link and then somehow make it a Republican Democrat thing. Those are not you own words either. No one talks like that.
-->
@sadolite
You put a link and then somehow make it a Republican Democrat thing. Those are not you own words either. No one talks like that.
False. Should we expect less from you Sad?
-->
@ebuc
Well researched.
-->
@ebuc
You cant define what a woman or a man is in your own words. Even your links don't define it. That is all.