Then even more doubly so when you ripped into my analysis as absolute shite, but it being shite totally changes when I flip town and magically makes Grey scum?
Your asanalysis is shit. Go back to my dp1 commentary on it, I point out how it isn't based on solid logic. Some of the commentary was good, the ones based on good logic. I thought the shitty logic was a scummy thing before, because I was thinking, "Hey Budda's smart, he would only use logical fallacies, if he was trying to force some reads".
That said, i didn't think every statement was based on bad logic.
My guess would be he was trying to say you were trapping him DP1. You insisted he vote Supa, then came out immediately DP2 and flipped on ur read. Thats a pretty blatant and transparent set up of an FoS.
True, it seems so. I knew it would look that way if he flipped inno, but I was certain he was guilty, so I didn't care. I'm in shock now. I've never felt so strongly about somebody being guilty been wrong. I know you've felt that stongly and was wrong before.
I assume I'll be lynched this dp/ I made a huge error. I was 100% sure that GP was guilty., so I pushed hard for his lynch. I saw him do things I saw scum do, like waffle on the hammer. I thought man town would not be scared to look scummy after a wrong quick hammer, but scum percieve hammering as drawing suspicion on themselves. I saw tons of actions that could be attributed to scum.
I have no reads, the ones I had before, I'm dismissing. Apparently I can't contribute any behavioral analysis, since I suck at it. I don't trust myself, I feel lost. I'm mad at myself and want to quit after being wrong. I keep going out of a sense of obligation, but don't want to. I don't want to sub in either. I'll just hurt town.
I was so certain he was guilty, so I almost claimed cop who got a guilty result?
My guess would be he was trying to say you were trapping him DP1. You insisted he vote Supa, then came out immediately DP2 and flipped on ur read. Thats a pretty blatant and transparent set up of an FoS.
NO, he said he hammered supa as some sort of set-up to prove I was scum, not as me laying a trap for him. Me laying a trap for him would have made sense from his POV, but from his POV it shows a contradiction. He claimed he knew I was town, but also claimed he knew I was scum and laying a trap for me (in referance to DP1 not dp2 where his read changed). He was lying about his motivations for hammering dp1, with that statement. He also refused to answer one user who asked him about his motivations. Why would any towny not immediately answer a simple question? I assumed the only explanation was that he was scum who was trying to buy time to make up a lie, or he couldn't think of a good lie so was just trying to dodge the question.
I have boxes I check off in my head. I think of each behavior and the possible meanings. Sometimes I will actually write down a list of all possible meanings, and if no town reasons come up, than I place them in the scum category. No town reasons came up for lying about setting me up for a trap. Some doubt about his guilt started to creep into my mind, but when he blatantly lied it secured it for me.
Your terrible logic, made me put you in the scum category. The behavior I analyzed was "budda was making some absolutely horrible and what should be obvious logical fallacies". I thought what town motivations could explain this, and what came to my head is that you're an idiot who is just too stupid to recognize your own cognitive distortions or to know when you are making a fallacious statement, and then I thought "That can't be right, budda is a smart guy. I then started to think of scum reasons. I thought, it makes sense. scum can't actually create scum tells on town, because members of town are town, so what they might do is have to use fucked up logic to make it look like they're doing real world actual analysis.
You were town, so I realized I was wrong about something there, but I can't figure it out. I still can't. You could be scum right now, which sucks if you are because I need honest criticism about how I scum hunt.
Below is another example of shitty logic, but apparently that is not a scum tell for you so I can't put you as scum, but it can work to illustrate my frustration.
, but it being shite totally changes when I flip town and magically makes Grey scum?
No, I explained my scum read was for the reasons I listed for argent, not for your reads. I merely thought your analysis on him specifically had merit, not that your analysis made him guilty. The above is shitty logic because it distorts what happened instead of looking at what actually happened. In budda's mind "Wylted claimed GP was scum because of my analysis on him" In reality what happened was "wylted scum read GP because his waffling at the end, blatant lying about setting a trap and all the reasons he gave argent, but also thought budda's analysis had some merit and could help explain why GP was scum".
--------------------------
You'll still do that stupid shit of distorting reality though and thinking some off the wall shit, like above. I just wish you wouldn't .
"He's ringing every town and scum alarm at the same time."
You'll still do that stupid shit of distorting reality though and thinking some off the wall shit, like above. I just wish you wouldn't .
"He's ringing every town and scum alarm at the same time." Note, players who do that are usually town, as the scum alarms can be attributed to townies generally caring less about how they look in comparison to actually catching scum.
Townies shouldn't care how they look period, end of story.
I'll still town read on supa. I think him wanting to lynch budda at the beginning of dp2 was a clear tell that he had no clue who the NK was, and honestly I think he is too stupid to be able to generate that town tell in a phony way. I'm still just going to get on the biggest wagons and stay there because I can't trust my own thoughts at all.
