Immigration

Author: TheUnderdog

Posts

Total: 32
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,615
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
 warped ideologies
They can have any ideology they want; it's free speech.  Grow a thick skin you snowflake.

So you'll be happy to explain that to the relatives of all those little girls and young mothers blown to pieces at the Manchester Area bombing, will you.

However will you explain to Saffie Roussos's parents that the lovely young Muslim  man Salman Abedi that blew their little 8 year old girl to bits had every right to practice his ideology which included  blowing their little girl to pieces? Will you tell them to "grow a thick skin" and ridicule them as "snowflakes"?

TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Stephen
So you'll be happy to explain that to the relatives of all those little girls and young mothers blown to pieces at the Manchester Area bombing, will you.
Terrorist attacks aren't ideologies.  People can believe and say whatever they want.  I can advocate the death of Joe Biden.  It only becomes a problem if I actually act on said belief.

However will you explain to Saffie Roussos's parents that the lovely young Muslim  man Salman Abedi that blew their little 8 year old girl to bits had every right to practice his ideology which included  blowing their little girl to pieces?
I don't know why your using extremely rare incidents; your more likely to get killed in a car crash than you are by a terrorist attack.  Yet we aren't going to ban cars (just like we won't ban Muslims) because freedom is a tradeoff to saving lives, and authoritarian leftists and conservatives try to strip liberty for a false sense of safety.

I would argue it's an SJW move to judge the individual by the group identity.  Wanting to ban Muslims because of a terrorist attack is like wanting to castrate men because some of them rape.  Both ideas are equally ludicrious.