I can only offer you the same advice Carlin gave us. Go spend some time alone with nature. Be a host for the thousands of things that want to consume your body, and then come back with your pretentious bullshit and start talking about how much of a threat to the planet you feel today.
30 Billion chickens agree.
I can tell you are no fan of Carlin because he exposes frauds. In a funny way of course.
What you’re doing here is particularly bad faith trolling. While everyone else appears to be having a discussion in good faith, your replies are specifically targeted to try and derail the conversation. I’m going to explain the detail - but a nice little summary is that you have completely failed to say anything particularly valid, you haven’t addressed a single thing anyone has levelled at you, much less actually defended anything - but you simply post repeatedly as if you had.
It’s particularly hard for someone who is honest to deal with this; because really, what can you say to someone who is arguing as if everyone else is saying nothing. You clearly understand and appreciate that you’re ignoring the details everyone is saying, missing the point by just enough to sound as if you have - it’s just intentional pissing one peoples heads and telling them it’s raining.
For example: you started off just lobbing little argument grenades, and sniping - this is where you just throw out an objection, with the goal of saying as little as possible, for making others arguing in good faith to say as much as you can make them.
If you pay attention you’ve failed to defend everything you’ve said:
-Your argument that climate change is fine because previous apocalypses haven’t killed everyone (patently dumb).
-Your argument that Venus was 70 degrees completely missed the point (and was simply pulled of the web, and I doubt you understand the maths)
-You made an error with misunderstanding thermal breakdown of a given material.
-You confuse protection from nature with destruction of nature.
-And you confuse individuals being hypocrites - with the validity of one portion of what they are being hypocrites about.
Obviously; you have defended none of this, and are simply made replying as if you said something valid.
Same again in this reply, you’ve just made the same reply you just said a couple of posts earlier, and instead of defending what you said, or addressing what I said, you’ve just tried to bait the conversation with dangling statements about George Carlin.
That’s a particularly shitty troll move; but typically effective, where you drop in something hoping that people can’t resist addressing it, knowing that if they do, it’s derailed the conversation.
If you want to have an actual discussion on climate change, feel free; I encourage it. What you’re doing is not that; in fact, what you’re doing is going out of your way to completely avoid having an actual discussion.
I can reasonably predict that instead of actually defending what you said: and explain why you feel that there is no difference protecting ourself from nature and destroying an entire ecosystem (you can’t because it’s an obvious attempt to troll), you’re just going to reiterate the same thing again, you’re going deliberately avoid the discussion - and continue trolling.
