Well.
Hear we have a nominal Head of State...The Queen, an ailing 90 something. Unelected
And then we elect a government and consequently a Prime Minister.
And then we also elect devolved governments to Scotland, N Ireland and Wales and other British colonies.
And then we have an unelected Upper House of Lords. Which although sometimes wrongly portrayed as a bunch of sleepy aristocrats, does in fact do a good job of moderating the government.
Although the Monarch does historically represent a powerful establishment lobby, they ordinarily have no influence over government policy.
Whereas in the U.S. The Head of State seems to have a more dictatorial role.
We do still have died in the wool political allegiances, but to a much lesser extent than the U.S. I would say.
And because of the nature of our multi-party system, absolute government control over policy is never guaranteed.
And then I would suggest that we have a mainstream media system which is seemingly much less able to directly influence government. And also religious institutions with no direct influence over policy.
Rightly or wrongly, I see the U.S media as perhaps a third tier of government influence and religious institutions very much as a fourth.
And then there's Global Media!...Heads down and do as you are told, as it were.
Now that's a bigger issue.