Does Putin Approve of Biden's FBI tactics?

Author: Greyparrot

Posts

Total: 62
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,253
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Is Biden using the FBI to wisely crush his political enemies before they can become a threat to his Democracy?
BigPimpDaddy
BigPimpDaddy's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 224
0
2
6
BigPimpDaddy's avatar
BigPimpDaddy
0
2
6
something was stolen directly from the president's daughter; this is not unusual.

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Putin approves of anything that can destroy the US unless it can harm him. If the unfolding of things that imply Clinton to have framed Trump with Russia ends up long-term not being likely to harm Putin's reputation itself, Putin will completely support it regardless of whether or not he originally supported Trump.

To answer the question 'does Putin approve' ask yourself whether or not it will end up harming Putin and if that's a 'not' then ask yourself if it will harm the US; if that's a yes, you have definite approval.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,253
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
I think Biden is behaving like a strong leader using the FBI to crush his enemies of the state.
BigPimpDaddy
BigPimpDaddy's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 224
0
2
6
BigPimpDaddy's avatar
BigPimpDaddy
0
2
6
I think Biden is behaving like a strong leader using the FBI to crush his enemies of the state.
dude his daughters diary was stolen.

626 days later

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,253
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
yes?
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
Putin and Biden are both politicians who want power.

Putin is ready to be more extreme, thats the difference.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Is Biden using the FBI to wisely crush his political enemies before they can become a threat to his Democracy?
You’re just asking questions - like FOX News does.

Is Grey Parrott a Russian bot or just an uninformed moron? I’m just asking questions .

Because educated adults in the United States know that the President has no control over the Justice Department or the FBI.

Only a corrupt douche like Trump who asked for loyalty and then fired the FBI director, fired his Attorney General without cause, threatened to fire his second FBI Director prompting his third Attorney General to threaten to resign along with his deputy, meddled with his second Attorney General and pushed him to cheat in an election causing him to resign, could you say the President is using the FBI to crush his political enemies.

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,253
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@whiteflame
@oromagi
Is Grey Parrott a Russian bot or just an uninformed moron? I’m just asking questions .
Reported for continued harassment and insults.

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Reported for continued harassment and insults.
No insult. I’m just asking questions 

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,253
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
No insult. I’m just asking questions 

The Mods can decide if question formats can circumvent the spirit of the COC.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
The Mods can decide if question formats can circumvent the spirit of the COC.
The same way you and FOX News attempt to circumvent facts and truth, right?

Glad you admit your deception 

whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,952
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
@IwantRooseveltagain
Is Grey Parrott a Russian bot or just an uninformed moron? I’m just asking questions .
Posing it as a question does not make it any less of a personal attack, especially since you’re saying that it’s between these two possibilities, both of which are personal attacks. 

Consider this your warning.

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Asking if someone is a Russian bot is against the COC?

Which part exactly? Quote the exact language of the COC that says users can’t ask someone if they are a Russian bot.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,952
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
That’s not what I said. Insinuating that someone is either a Russian bot or a moron based on something they said is a personal attack. 
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
both of which are personal attacks. 
This is what you said. Asking if or calling someone a Russian bot is a personal attack? 

whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,952
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yes. Claiming that someone is effectively not an individual capable of thought, functionally acting as a mouthpiece of the Russian government, is a pretty clear personal attack.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Really? So you have a pretty broad definition of a personal attack. We will see if you can be consistent in your imperial ruling.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,952
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Just follow the basic rules of the site, dude, it’s not hard. You can say what you want about his posts, but targeting him with a personal accusation is off limits. Simple.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Don’t call me dude. Call me sir. Dude is flippant and disrespectful.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,253
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@whiteflame
Posing it as a question does not make it any less of a personal attack, especially since you’re saying that it’s between these two possibilities, both of which are personal attacks. 

Consider this your warning.

Thank you.

whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,952
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yeah… whatever you say, dude.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Well dude

Harassment 
Targeted harassment of any member prohibited, as is inciting others to do so at your behest. This includes wishing or hoping that someone and/or their loved ones experiences physical harm.

There is nothing in the COC that says anything about personal attacks. Nothing that prohibits personal attacks. 

You an obviously don’t have the temperament nor judgement for this voluntary responsibility. I suggest you resign 


whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,952
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I’m not going to continue to engage on this. You know the policy regarding insults, and yes, that relates to personal attacks. These were insults, plain and simple. Don’t do it.

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Well Dude, You don’t want to engage because you are wrong. Because you don’t have an adequate understanding of the COC. 

There is zero reference to insults or personal attacks in the COC. Have a clue, dude 
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,952
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Unwarranted systemic vulgarity and invectives, which may include off topic personal attacks and/or hate speech, are subject to disciplinary actions.
You’re welcome.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Unwarranted systemic vulgarity and invectives, which may include off topic personal attacks and/or hate speech, are subject to disciplinary actions.
Well dude,

No vulgarity 
No invectives 
No “off topic” personal attacks or hate speech

So you are O for 3


Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
@Iwantroosevelt

Attacking a person =/= attacking an argument.

Just attack arguments, not the person who makes it.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,952
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Personal attacks are, by their very nature, off topic. 

I’ll also note that there’s a whole separate post clarifying enforcement based on use of insults and personal attacks.


You can continue to feign ignorance all you want, but I know you have seen and presumably understand these rules.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
Personal attacks are, by their very nature, off topic. 
No, if someone makes a statement that is stupid and I call them stupid it is completely on topic.

Similar to when someone tells a lie and they are called a liar.

If I said they were ugly, then that would be off topic.