The fallout from Gov. Phil Murphy’s school mask mandate continued this week as one school board postponed a meeting after attendees refused to wear masks and another cut short public comment after yelling and name-calling disrupted a mask discussion.
“When the argument started to ensue, I had to shut it down,” said Dotty Porcaro, president of the Manalapan-Englishtown Board of Education, which had to kick out one resident Tuesday night who refused to wear a mask to its regular meeting. “They started talking about concentration camps and comparing (the mask mandate) to Nazis.”
The school board eventually approved a resolution urging Murphy to reverse his mandate but stressed that it would be followed when the new school year begins Sept 9.
“They were stating that if we allow this it is the beginning of the government taking away rights,” Porcaro said about some meeting attendees. “Then there was hollering back and forth. I don’t want to deny anyone the right to speak, but this was a board meeting and I can’t have people screaming and fighting amongst themselves.”
In Wall, the regular school board meeting was suspended Tuesday just after roll call when at least 60 people refused to wear masks.
Board attorney Athena Cornell stated that due to some of those in attendance not wearing masks in violation of Murphy's executive order mandating them, it would be rescheduled to Aug. 31.
“The Wall Board of Education is following Executive Order 251 (the mask mandate for schools), effective Aug. 9, and Executive Order 253 (outlining exceptions), effective yesterday,” Cornell said. “While we understand many disagree, the board is required to follow the executive orders.
"Going forward all in-person meetings will require masks. As a result, the meeting will be rescheduled for Aug. 31 at 6:15 p.m.”
Some in the crowd yelled out, “cowards, cowards.”
Wall Township Board President Ralph Addonizio said later that at least 60 people in attendance refused to wear the masks. The rescheduled meeting will be virtual-only.
He said the virtual meeting is the best way to avoid future controversy, for the moment: “It protects the district from any liability and it protects the parents who are very strongly against masks.”
Addonizio had written a letter to Murphy two weeks ago opposing the mask mandate and asking that it be removed.
“Your blanket orders do not reflect what is in the best interest of the students and staff of the Wall Township Public Schools and infringe on home rule,” Addonizio wrote in the letter.
He continued: “In your new executive order, you cite ‘the CDC now recommends universal indoor masking for all teachers, staff, students, and visitors in K-12 schools, regardless of vaccination status.’ This is a recommendation, provided to offer guidance to states and families. The district Pandemic Response Team used this guidance to make their final recommendation for the school year.”
The incidents are the latest in an ongoing battle over Executive Order 251, signed Aug. 9, which requires all school staff and students to be masked in school buildings.
Opposition has also come from school administrators and board members in Holmdel, Toms River, and Middletown.
Just days after sending a letter to parents stressing that the governor’s mask mandate for students will be enforced and those disobeying would be sent home, the Manalapan-Englishtown board passed a resolution Tuesday urging the governor to rescind the directive.
Manalapan-Englishtown school leaders have had to walk a tightrope in recent weeks between a growing vocal opposition to the governor’s executive order and efforts to ensure that the district does not break the law.
The conflict bubbled up several times during recent meetings, including Tuesday night’s board meeting that resulted in one resident being removed for not wearing a mask. Public comment at the meeting was stopped after 40 minutes after it grew into shouting and accusations of Nazi behavior by some speakers, according to Board President Dotty Porcaro.
The mask mandate drew similar anger at the Middletown Board of Education, which reluctantly passed a resolution Tuesday mandating masks for students, teachers and staff — anyone entering a school building — when the fall term begins.
The pared-down policy was more restrictive than the board had originally intended. As originally written, it would have empowered parents to excuse their children from the mandate by asserting some medical reason why their children could not wear a mask. But it was changed after Murphy clarified that such provisions would be opposed legally.
For Manalapan-Englishtown, the mask battle dates back to June when former Superintendent John Marciante took a leave of absence rather than oversee the removal of a previous mask mandate after angry parents demanded it.
He retired just weeks later.
Since then, his replacement, Nicole Santora, has found herself in the middle of a tug of war between Murphy’s mask mandate and parents opposed to it.
Things were so tense that district officials waited more than two weeks to affirm their plans for implementing the governor’s mask mandate, which was announced Aug. 9. It will require all students to be masked in class, with some exceptions for excessive heat, health concerns and other specific issues.
Santora informed parents of the implementation plan in an Aug. 20 letter that stated the mask mandate would be in place when school starts on Sept. 9 and those not following it will be forced to leave school grounds.
“Students, staff, and visitors will be required to wear masks in the indoor portion of school district premises,” the letter stated. “Additionally, we recognize that the exceptions … are there for medical necessity; and, therefore, we will be implementing the exemptions as they are part of the executive order.”
But it later made clear that anyone not wearing a mask and failing to meet an exemption would be separated from other students until a parent or guardian picks them up.
“I do not think that it is in the best interest of any child to be in a position of deciding whether they should defy their parent or the law. Nor, in this instance, will I suspend a child for listening to their parent,” the superintendent wrote.
She later explained, “If a child comes to school without a mask, they will be offered one. If they refuse, we will call their parent/guardian.
“If the parent/guardian states that they will not have their child wear a mask, we will isolate the child until their parent/guardian can pick them up. The child will be given asynchronous work to complete while waiting for their parent/guardian. The child will be excluded from school until they follow Executive Order 251.”
A recent Gallup poll found that two-thirds of U.S. adults and 60% of K-12 parents support mask mandates for unvaccinated teachers and staff members. A slightly lower percentage of U.S. adults (64%) and 57% of parents of school-aged children favor mask mandates for unvaccinated students.
Parents in the 5,000-student Manalapan-Englishtown district, which serves grades K-8, have made their opposition known for months at several school board meetings, with many claiming their children are unable to breath in masks, come home depressed and discouraged, or become frightened at the atmosphere.
Some even claim the masks do little to protect students or believe the virus is not as contagious as they are told.
In an apparent effort to appease those in opposition, the school board on Tuesday passed a resolution urging that opponents of the mandate reach out to the governor’s office to register complaints. It also formally asked Murphy to rescind the mandate.
“While the Board recognizes the risk of COVID-19, the Board also recognizes and acknowledges that many residents of Manalapan and Englishtown believe that individuals, parents, and health care providers should have the flexibility to make their own decisions about their health and the measures they take to protect themselves, including the decision to wear a mask,” the resolution stated.
“The Board recognizes that those residents call upon Governor Murphy to immediately rescind EO 251 and allow individuals and the parents of children to make their own decisions regarding mask wearing.”