-->
@zedvictor4
Really exemplifies the limits of one track
Yes, the responses I have gotten so far really do.
Really exemplifies the limits of one track
We are going with what YOU think God would be like and what they would want
That would be pure unfounded conjecture by necessity. I can tell you fables if you like but I would be honest about having made the story up.
1. Disinterested in human affairs entirely
2. Has a goal other than improving wellbeing
3. Unable to effect the course of human events sufficient to minimize human suffering particularly from non human sources (should you personally believe they wouldn't interfere with the will of rapists and murderers because of the myth of freewill)
How do you know that anything you describe about God would be conjecture?
why do you feel you have no say in the equation?
May I ask why you believe that? in your words, why would God be disinterested in what was created?
2. Has a goal other than improving wellbeingDo you think your life is incapable of improving your well being? what do you consider well being, material comfort or self improvement?
What if human suffering IS the course of human experience?
So far you only told me what you think God WOULDN'T do or have, can you add anything you think God would have or do? perhaps be like?
See...this is what I am referring to when I say you're smuggling your own assumptions in.Enlighten me on how I did so? In one scenario God exists and the other no God exists.