Cosmic Primary Triangulate and Quadrulet

Cosmic Primary Numerical Triangulate is 0, 1, 2p
 
Linear, symmetrical and numerically sequential set:  0, 1, 2p, 3p, 4, 5p, 6, 7p
-----note; in above, all prime { p } numbers fall on same line--
 
Quasi-2D, symmetrical, triangular pattern set i.e. 0, 1, 2p defnes triangular pattern s i.e. numerical pattern set 3 integers, as we return to level/line where we began;
0.....2p.........4..........6.........8.........10...........12......
.....1........3p.......5p......7p.......9...........11p...........
----note; all prime numbers except 2p, fall on same line and the only triplet prime set  exists 3p, 5p, 7p-----
 
Quasi-2D, symmetrical, numerical pattern set of 5 integers; 0..................4.....................8.................12....................16................20………..
....1........3p.......5p........7p.......9......11p......13p......15........17p…19p…21……
……2p....…………6..................10...................14...................18......................
---note: all primes except 2p are on inside level/line. A triplet prime set still exists and the defining closure pattern is a numerical 5 set, as we return to level/line where we began-----
 
Quasi-2D, symmetrical, numerical pattern set of 7 integers { 0-6 };
0……………………6……………………..12……………..
…1……………5p………7p………….11p……13p………..
……2p……4………………8…….10………………14……
……….3p……………………..9…………………………15
---Note;  triplet prime gone and triplet twin prime pattern set is on top, inside level/line. All primes except 2p and 3p are on top, inside level/line. -----  
 
Quasi-2D, asymmetrical, numerically sequential pattern set of four levels/lines, that, have been turned inside-out. Still a numerical pattern set of 7 integers; { 0-6 };
…1…………5p……7p…………11p……13p………………17p……19p………
-
-
0…………………6……………………12………………………..18……………
………3p…………………9…………………………15………………………21
-
-
……2p…4………………8…10…………………14……16……………….20
 
----note: nucleated hexagons appear in our pattern of sequential numbers/integers. 3p, 5p, 7p, 9, 8, 2p is nucleated by #6.  #9 is  next nucleus, then 12, then 15 etc.
 
----0, 1, 2p has non-counting zero{ 0 } being nucleus to a cosmic primary triplet, that precedes the overlapping, nucleated hexagons.
 
---this asymmetrical pattern set could be said to on to infinity on each level/line or we can say the top line/level comes around to finite closure as a great circle that correlates to outer peak of positive curvature of a torus. 
 
---the bottom level/line does the same, but is the inner great circle of the same torus and is the diametric opposite of the peak of positive curvature of same torus
 
---the two inside levels/lines define the topology of a sine-wave pattern. The sine-wave pattern is associated with all many if not all fermions and bosons of Universe
 
---the four line/levels each a great circle of a specific numerical torus pattern Ive discovered above, may correlated directly with the four great hexagonal polygonal –or and/or circular--- planes of the cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron aka the Vector Equilibrium in Bucky Fullers Synergetic mathematical explorations
 
---ergo, we see a cosmic primary fourness associated in quasi-2D, 3D torus numerical patterning and 3D polyhedral mathematics
 
----the four line/level was also used by Arthur Young { inventor of Bell helicopter } however, he did use the non-counting number/integer zero { 0 }

r u like a scientist or something?

Yes, the above is corrrect Db.   If you want to understand that something then all you have to do is read what I write. 

If you have sincerity of heart, then you may ask a specific question for specific word, phrase etc, that you dont understand.

..."Cosmic Primary Numerical Triangulate is 0, 1, 2p"... is first line and always a good place to begin. :--)

ok then what does 

."Cosmic Primary Numerical Triangulate is 0, 1, 2p". mean?

"Cosmic Primary Numerical Triangulate is 0, 1, 2p". mean?

If you dont understand any of the words, ---and it appears you dont or just plain ole lack of sincerity of heart---, then get a dictionary and learn about each word.

Then, you need to place that line of text in context of all that follows it, because the whole --several lines of text--  is related to all of its parts { each line of text }.

Personally I dont think you have any sincerity of heart ergo waste of time to go into with you. I dunno. We will see.

The dude pretty clearly has schizophrenia, for those who r unaware

......

Have you not noticed that hardly anyone reads these things? If you do, then I advise you to post all these to SciForums or something similar instead of the place that is more obsessed with semantics, politics and religious law.

I've told you, he just writes word salad. None of it means anything.

Idk how you could know that? He just seems like a Deepak Chopra kind of guy 

Ebuc is Ebuc.

They are an enigma.

I was once to my regret, somewhat disparaging.

Extract what you can from Ebuc's posts and therein lies rational, logical common sense......And sincerity.

Thank you Zed.  Now be prepared to be attacked with various degrees of irrational, illogical lack of common sense from some who have posted here above.

Good luck :--D

PS:  triplets, triangulates, threeness --ex hadrons{ protons  are stable beyond belief }--- etc are more about structure { diagonalization } whereas fourness is more about systemic operations.

So there is interesting fact of the Vector Equilibrium { equanimity } in that its 8 surface triangles{ threeness } define four diametric axi.  So that in itself is interesting threeness via triangular structure { 60 degree in of themselves } and then,

the four axi between them that exists inn 60 degree orientation to each other.  This is the four great circle planes, that define the VE aka 12-around-1 sphericals.

3-ness = structurally pure, dynamic 60-degreeness, and

4-ness = systemically pure operationally, that, has a side effect, that, induces  three, 90 degree { unstable } resultant diametric axi of the six surface squares of the same VE.

This above is seemingly i a simple-to-complex evolutionary process since it is 3-ness inducing a 4-ness.  Maybe I'm incorrect in that assessment.  It may be more correct to say that, dynamic 3-ness has the inherent side-effect of 4-ness. I dunno. 

See links that follows.

Here below is is visual of the how --if not also why-- the 90 degree, 3 axi are unstable, until the surface square are reoriented.  Octahedron had primary three 90-degree axi and very stable. So it is about the surface shape, that appears to make something more or less stable ergo more less existent as  stable structure.

While I consider mathematics to be the language of God, I'm afraid the use of extended ellipsis periods is random in number and, therefore, not a proper use of them, and, therefore, relative junk in your lexicon.

Remember the Pythagoras theorem from school? This is that guy. Revered as a famous mathematician and scientist, many don't know that he actually started his own religion- Pythagoreanism. Some of the commandments of Pythagoreanism, however, were a bit odd like - "Do not, under any circumstances, eat beans", "Do not walk on highways" , and "Do not step over a crossbar." No wonder Pythagoreanism didn't gain popularity along the way. 

This is ebuc.

Everybody knows what a genius Tesla was and how, even though he was a true visionary, he never got his due from the world. But Tesla was also completely crazy. He had a serious case of obsessive-compulsive disorder. He was a germophobe who refused to touch anything that was a little dirty or anything that was round in shape. He was also in love with the number 3. He would walk 3 times around the block before entering the building. He would only stay in a hotel room that was divisible by 3. He would require 18 napkins for each meal - 3 stacks of 6. Funnily, after he built a high-frequency oscillator, he invited Mark Twain over because he was having problems with his bowel movements. He told Twain to stand on the machine. It took not more than 90 seconds for Twain to run for the bathroom. Nikolai later said that he shook the poop out of Mark Twain. 

Tesla shook the poop out of Twain. Good book title, but the movie might be graphic. However, you might enjoy [or be revolted] this  personal composition:

Ode on a Commode: A Toilet Subtlty
 
There comes more frequently undone,
A mean and cruel and flatted course, 
Such bubbling rumbles from the source, 
The sphincter terminus of digestion
To interrupt all else and seek refuge
In porcelain; clean and white, refined;
Receptive. Oh, this may be huge!
Explosion splatters just in time.
And then once more into the breach,
Taken once more by soap and bleach, 
One is reminded: ingratitude of age
That eat what may, seasoned by sage
Advice, the vice of culinary art:
Old age can never trust a fart.

The odd number rule discovered by Galileo.  https://catalogue.museogalileo.it/gallery/GalileosLawFallingBodies.html

An explained more in depth here as associated with gravity/mass-attraction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6VBV4QUMu0

Odd numbers: 1, 3p, 5p, 7p, 9, 11p, 13p, 17p, 19p, 21, 23p and below Ive highlighted them in numererically sequential, invaginated, spiral helix tube ---based on the symmetrical, four line-level, that, has been inside-outed ergo asymmetrical is what is shown here below.

Ok, I've reversed the two inside lines, this means that we have done two transpositions from the numerically sequential and symmetrical four line/level pattern;

1} first we inside outed the four lines/levels, two inside moved to closet outside and  two outside moved to closet inside,

2] now wit new infor ---The 'Odd Number Rule'-- we reverse the two inside lines, which is not is not rational transposition/process, however, it does make a better fit of  the 'Odd Number Rule' with the top line as representation of ultra-micro Gravity (  ).

Ergo the the Odd Number Rule is closer to each other 1, 3p, 5p, 7p, 11p, 13p, 17p,23p etc. H,mm seems crazy because not rational, but it makes better logical sense for those two lines to be closer to each other.

So above is the asymmetrical inside-outed version with the transposition { higher to lower and lower to higher } of two, inside-the-tube, numerical sequence of as a topological sine-wave patterning. Below is the original symmetrical sine-wave patterning;