Pettiness from extremists

This is an argument from incredulity as you gave no objective reason for us not to trust the source. 

I've also demonstrated that African Americans don't pay for themselves, so at this stage you're objectively wrong.

The only time I would support automation is if there is a better alternative for the worker being automated.

You haven't given us a reason to agree with you.

Again, Hispanics are a net negative on the US economy.

For example, African Americans are a minority in America and yet BLM is globally known.

You haven't provided a source for your second paragraph. Let's fix that before we start making arguments that extend from it.

In addition, homeland security and related costs figure at around $589 billion. The cumulative costs of business interruption and reduced airline travel and tourism is estimated to be around $123 billion. Add to that $1.649 trillion in war funding and $867 billion in future war and veteran care, and the entire cost to the U.S. government adds up to a staggering $3.3 trillion.

Your middle argument isn't sourced. If you're not going to source anything you say, I have better things to read. I'm tempted to agree with it but I won't without a source.

America has spent more killing middle easterners than it has spent on Middle Easterners attacking the US.

3000 people dying in an attack is obviously horrific for the people involved, though.

Refusing a vacciene or a mask doesn't make vaccinated people significently less safe.  You can make this argument to implement a muslim ban.

People should be free to decide their own risk tolerance, whether that is having sex with someone with HIV, or being unvaccinated.

This is why it is acceptable to speed even though some people die as a result.  The freedom of 250 million drivers to speed for over an hour every day for 350 days a year is a legitimate trade off to the 30,000 people that die from car accidents.  If you disagree, then don't speed.

There is no evidence that banning Muslims would have any detectable impact on national security. 

Your gay example if just as absurd. 

You haven’t listened to a word I or anyone else has said. 

Getting vaccinated is not merely a personal choice, your actions impact everyone else around you.

Unvaccinated people not only have a far greater chance of spreading the virus to other people including those who are immune compromised

but they are far more likely to drain our medical resources by filling up hospital ICU’s

contribute to mutations of the virus that the vaccines may not be able to protect against

contribute to the economic impacts this has on all of us.

Setting aside the disgusting claim that 30,000 lives a year is a proportional trade off to letting everyone speed all year… Speeding doesn’t just endanger the safety of the driver, it impacts the safety of every car and pedestrian around that driver.

Do you believe in the old saying; “the freedom to swing your arms ends at someone else’s nose”?

No muslims in America -> less terror attacks.  But freedom and economic growth are trade offs to the deaths from terrorism, so the US lets muslims in.

The gay example is legitimate because HIV is also a health threat and kills many people just like covid, unless your claiming HIV is no big deal.

People who are immunocompromised (like my brother) can still get a vaccine to protect themselves.

America does not have UHC.  The government does not pay a single cent for people to get treated.

People who aren't vaccinated only impact their own economy.  Buisinesses can hire others for more money to fill the void left by the employee that got covid.

Do you believe in the old saying; “the freedom to swing your arms ends at someone else’s nose”?

It's more like, "People can swing their arms if the odds of hitting someone is almost non existent (assuming they are blind and have no idea if they are hitting someone)".

This is an argument from incredulity as you gave no objective reason for us not to trust the source. 

Because they state that they are Alt right in their YouTube video which implies that they are biased.  It is pretty much only people with a strong right bias that call their channel "Alt censored".  

I've also demonstrated that African Americans don't pay for themselves, so at this stage you're objectively wrong.

Most African Americans pay for themselves as only a minority consume welfare benefits.  Those that do should get jobs.  Corporations take more welfare than individuals do.

The only time I would support automation is if there is a better alternative for the worker being automated.

You haven't given us a reason to agree with you.

So the unemployment rate doesn't skyrocket.

Again, Hispanics are a net negative on the US economy.

Only the Hispanic adults that are on welfare are a negative to the US economy.  Kicking them off at the federal and state level (and kicking corporations off of welfare) causes this group to not be on welfare anymore.

For example, African Americans are a minority in America and yet BLM is globally known.

BLM is known, but not everyone supports BLM.

You haven't provided a source for your second paragraph. Let's fix that before we start making arguments that extend from it.

Because the kids of muslims get exposed to huge numbers of christains and this causes them to respect western values more than their parents.

In addition, homeland security and related costs figure at around $589 billion. The cumulative costs of business interruption and reduced airline travel and tourism is estimated to be around $123 billion. Add to that $1.649 trillion in war funding and $867 billion in future war and veteran care, and the entire cost to the U.S. government adds up to a staggering $3.3 trillion.

These costs were just government waste and these costs should have never been paid.  Terrorist attacks don't have to result in this spending.  The buildings being destroyed was only about $55 billion and we should have gotten Saudi Arabia to pay for it.

Your middle argument isn't sourced. If you're not going to source anything you say, I have better things to read. I'm tempted to agree with it but I won't without a source.

If your referring to this claim:

America has spent more killing middle easterners than it has spent on Middle Easterners attacking the US.

Costs of the 20-year war on terror: $8 trillion and 900,000 deaths | Brown University states that the war on terror cost $8 trillion, enough money to pay every American over $24,000.

3000 people dying in an attack is obviously horrific for the people involved, though.

It's horrible for the people involved, but there are 300 million people in America.  if the odds of dying in a terrorist attack is 1/100,000, I don't think those are big odds to justify SJW policies of judging the Muslim group by the individual terrorists.

This is a bigger issue than both of these combined!