Pettiness from extremists

Me: WE ARE ALMOST $30 TRILLION IN DEBT!  This is a bigger issue than both of these combined!

Systemic racism is real but assimilation of Muslims towards a 'Western' culture is dependent on them and the community within that culture. It's neither a definitely yes or definitely no type thing. They do assimilate though, just not always. 

I don't think either of these are extremists

U.S. debt to GDP ratio was ~108% in 2020. While this is a problem, I don't see why we can't tax the 1% and use the money to overhaul our system of policing or anti-terrorism, since neither of those seem to be working.

Paying off the debt will be easy.

Stop bombing Middle Eastern countries (and receiving costly terrorist attacks in response: 9/11 costing $3 trillion). Stop supporting Israel (0.38 trillion over the next 10 years). Just get out and leave them all alone.

The cost of having African Americans in America costs around $1 trillion a year Fiscal Impact by Race in the United States - altCensored . A good policy would be to stop African immigration into the U.S. (or at least vet for the top Africans). We can also (and we are) look into automation and robotics to replace the low-skilled jobs that a lot of African Americans typically do, thus relieve the U.S. of some of the burden of importing the 3rd world to complete these jobs. A similar but lesser problem applies to Hispanics. A solution for Hispanics would be to deport illegals back to South America (this deportation is cost effective because you only need to transport them over the border). You could also limit Hispanic immigration, too. You furthermore replace any African/Hispanic immigration into the U.S. with an Asian and the U.S. would be financially better off.

Systemic racism is real but assimilation of Muslims towards a 'Western' culture is dependent on them and the community within that culture. It's neither a definitely yes or definitely no type thing. They do assimilate though, just not always. 

 Muslims into your country, you're bringing in a

No, it isn't. Culture has moral values as part of it, language doesn't. Learn to read things in context.

"Justly killed for their violence against officers"

(EITHER) conquer territory and make the inhabitants american citizens (OR) leave them the fuck alone and respect their sovereignty

There it is.

(1) Would you call yourself an "isolationist" ?

(2) Do you believe in "freedom of religion" ?

My friend, if I have to be the one to inform you that nobody deserves to die unless their death is the only way to prevent significant harm or death of others, you are beyond help.

I don't know how to explain to you that an officer perceiving an individual to be 'violent' does not warrant their execution.

I can't wait for you to tell me that putting a knee on someone's neck for nine minutes as they beg for air is 'just' or 'preventing violence.' The deaths or injury of these men is not 'fake news'; I assure you that their tombstones are very real. I not only support those who want to tear down the system borne from union-busting and slave catching that routinely commits these murders with no consequence, but I am disgusted at those who can look at that system and claim that it is just.

Just like I predicted, you turned an isolated incident of a White police officer using too much force against a Black person into 'systemic racism'.

We can add to this fact that when police officers do kill Black people, it's often justified as the Black person has lashed out in his/her resistance of arrest. For example, Rayshard Brooks decided to resist arrest and steal an officer's taser and tried to shoot officers with it. This killing of Rayshard Brooks is 100% justified.

Having a taser doesn't count as 'unarmed', but to be honest, I don't think murder should be the first option when there's several non-lethal places to shoot first and it's literally part of their job to be good at shooting things. I tell you that perceiving someone as 'violent' doesn't warrant ending their life, and you give me an example of someone shooting an officer with a taser. Even if it made sense, you know damn well that's not what I'm talking about.

The killer of George Floyd said it was apart of his training. No officer at the scene stopped him for an insane amount of time despite his pleas.

Philando Castile went out of his way to declare his firearm. It was later said that police are trained to liberally use their firearms.

Jacob Blake was shot 7 times despite not being violent (according to bystanders), not having a weapon, and not doing anything wrong in spite of the fact police could've very easily used a taser and had done so minutes earlier.

When Breonna Taylor was murdered, a policeman blindly shot an assault rifle into the house.

Eric Garner, Elijah McClain, do you want me to keep going? Even if I agree the number is only 48, which you say as though it is anything less than an annual killing spree, which it isn't, I still think that maybe the police could use their non-lethal tools more effectively with regards to unarmed black people when they have tasers capable of completely immobilizing a person and are literally trained for months to do this.

I could present to you a thousand instances and you'd still tell me it was 'isolated'.

The very system that is supposed to hold them accountable for the actions that disproportionately impact black people to an egregious degree chose not to do so. Not turning on body cams, planting drugs or weapons on people, using excessive force, the list of things that police officers routinely get away with that we make no attempt to persecute them for or enforce rules to prevent these actions goes on, and on, and on.

The fact black Americans are more likely to be pulled over, more likely to be harassed, less likely to be listened to by police, more likely to be perceived as violent? Black Americans are put through egregious, inhumane, and horrendous situations for the very crime of their race as the result of failing to keep in check the power of racist police officers. That's what systemic racism is.

Congratulations, America! You ended slavery (ignoring how the British did it first) 'worldwide', and yet somehow that manages to be a) completely irrelevant to what I'm saying and b) even more irrelevant because it took you until the 1960s-1970s to acknowledge that black people deserve the same rights. Well done for refuting the thing I said about slavery (which I definitely said and if you ctrl+f you will definitely find me mentioning slavery [sarcasm])

There are more options than 1. Let the (potential) criminal run away or 2: Murder them. Police are paid $60,000+ a year to understand that, and yet it seems they choose to forget much more often with blacks than with whites (28% of police killings in 2020 happened to blacks despite the fact they're 13% of the population).

Muslims don't assimilate into populations. Muslims tend to want Sharia and a caliphate wherever they go Muslim Beliefs About Sharia | Pew Research Center (pewforum.org). When you bring Muslims into your country, you're bringing in a population that will contest your systems -- that's a real reason to oppose Muslim immigration.

Two Muslim terrorist attacks have cost the U.S. significant amounts, around $3 trillion for 9/11, and $800 million in the other WTC attack The 10 Most Expensive Terrorist Attacks In History | TheRichest

The cost of having African Americans in America costs around $1 trillion a year 

African Americans pay for themselves through the tax dollars they pay.  I don’t trust your source.

A good policy would be to stop African immigration into the U.S. (or at least vet for the top Africans)

A better way to get out of debt is to allow as many workers in the US as we can get to increase the taxpayer count as much as we can to make paying off the debt easier.

We can also (and we are) look into automation and robotics to replace the low-skilled jobs that a lot of African Americans typically do, thus relieve the U.S. of some of the burden of importing the 3rd world to complete these jobs.

The only time I would support automation is if there is a better alternative for the worker being automated.

A solution for Hispanics would be to deport illegals back to South America (this deportation is cost effective because you only need to transport them over the border).

If we deport people, we lose the sales tax they pay.  I made a complex plan to get us out of debt.  Want to check it out?

I’m with you on not funding Israel any more.  I don’t like America picking sides in foreign conflicts.

Muslims don't assimilate into populations. Muslims tend to want Sharia and a caliphate wherever they go Muslim Beliefs About Sharia | Pew Research Center (pewforum.org). When you bring Muslims into your country, you're bringing in a population that will contest your systems -- that's a real reason to oppose Muslim immigration.

There are 1 billion Muslims and 1.7 billion westerners.  If every single Muslim moved to a western country, they would still be the minority in the west.  Since this will never happen, Muslims will always be a minority in the west in our lifetimes unless enough westerners get converted.  

Moreover, the children of Muslims are much more secular than the parents.  Not allowing Muslims to enter your country because they are theocrats is like not letting Bible Belt conservatives into your country because they are theocrats.

Two Muslim terrorist attacks have cost the U.S. significant amounts, around $3 trillion for 9/11, and $800 million in the other WTC attack The 10 Most Expensive Terrorist Attacks In History | TheRichest

I think your statistics are over blown.  The US annual budget for the entire government is $3 trillion.  No way does a terrorist attack cost that much.  America has spent more killing middle easterners than it has spent on Middle Easterners attacking the US.  But when your odds of dying from a terror attack is very small, your being petty if your worried about it.

Democrats are the party of tolerance (until you decide to open carry an AK 47, be mask less, or be without a vaccine.  Then they will not be tolerant.  They will justify this using some weird logic, but in the end they aren't being tolerant of your life choices.)

Can you explain what is hypocritical about this, since you’re so above the rest of us and our political opinions?

until you endanger the health and safety of others and/or the general public.