I have a light leaning town read on Budda. Aside from his contention with Aporia regarding tactics and strategy application in the match, I have found his logic to be sound. Perhaps it can be perceived as a bit aggressive, but I think that he has issued criticism more or less equally around the table.
I have a solid opinion that Supa is scum. He is a proven and self proclaimed player of experience and some skill, and it is entirely unusual for him to make mistakes to the degree that he has. The case can be made that these were and are genuine mistakes, however I can prove within reason that they were not. Furthermore, the only response Supa has had to his accusers has been to be irate, obscene, and otherwise desperate in his pleas. It would be far more beneficial to make his case with more than pure Ad Hominem. I believe it was suggested earlier in the thread that his actions have been a form of reverse psychology, a sentiment with which I agree.