It's pretty baffling how you came down on MC and me as the two most likely scum in this game. At best, you have minor behavioral issues that you seem fixated on while ignoring the way that this game has played out. Setting aside the fact that I have absolutely no history of bussing (feel free to check back), we were both on the lynch super early and could have hopped off at any point to hobble the lynch. As it was, the lynch barely went through and, as Luna already pointed out, probably wouldn't have happened if Badger had been given a chance to claim. You, in particular, seemed more focused on getting the claim than addressing the clear behavioral tells that Badger was exhibiting, many of which pointed to him being scum. As someone who regularly says he will not lynch during DP1 and often seeks claims with his votes, I can usually sympathize when others follow that basic pattern, but when Badger was actively refusing to claim and saying that he'd rather be lynched and even threatening to leave the game due to pressure, sticking to your normal DP1 meta doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
I have actually been rather consistent this game with my choices of targets. Badger was my only vote during DP1 and I stayed on him. During this DP, I started with Poly, got a partial claim (not all I wanted, but we got the rest later) and shifted over to you after a convincing rundown of aspects of your play that stand out from Luna, who I would consider about as town-confirmed as anyone in this game. I had noticed some issues prior to that, hence you were in the town-lean pile rather than the hard town pile, even if I had thought you were behaviorally consistent with your town performance in previous games.
Honestly, though, it's this rundown that you've given
here that has me the most suspicious. For someone who was so willing to set aside behavioral issues for a claim in DP1, you're really focused on some strange behavioral tells this DP and not at all on others. I understand that you and several others are willing to set aside Drlebronski as an option on the basis that his behavior is noobie, but for someone who was calling out me supposedly hopping on the trendy lynch (I'll note that I was third on the lynch for Badger and second for you, hardly what I would call trendy in either case), it's strange to immediately dismiss someone who has hopped on and off several lynches over the course of this game. The same holds true for Wylted who also jumped around quite a bit with his votes, and your explanation for why you doesn't consider Wylted a concern ("Wylted seems too far off in his own element to care much about the game") doesn't seem at all accurate to Wylted's play in DP1. I'm also not sure why you're dismissing all the "neutrals" and somehow leaving Luna, who actively led the lynch against Badger, in that pile. Earth and Poly may not have contributed much to this game, but it's not like there's nothing you could say about them at this point. Generally, this reads as an effort to throw suspicion onto MC and me with little basis in what's actually happened.
Meanwhile, while the 2X Strengthener claim may be real, but it also just works pretty well as a safe claim (unverifiable, especially without the RB in play) at this point since it's unlikely anyone else would have it and it does look like a solid counter to the 2X RB. But it also just seems like an odd role claim to accompany Cannae. The other claims make more sense to me. In the case of Actium and Phrarsalus, I can find bases for the Magistrate and Motion Detector roles, even if they're a little vague. I can understand the RB role for Carrhae as well, but largely from the perspective of the Parthian Empire in that conflict. The Strengthener role better fits Carthage in Cannae than it does the Romans, which sets it more in line with Carrhae than any of the other claims we have so far, and that's not to mention that it's the only other major defeat of the Romans that exists among any of our claims. Maybe I'm wrong about the split in this game being major Roman defeats (as opposed to internal conflicts and Roman victories), but even if I am, your claim is an obvious outlier among the ones we currently have. Couple that with the behavioral tells Luna's pointed out and it's honestly hard to find anyone else who stands out as much as you do.