CRT Breaks Everything

That is interesting info about the census. And it sounds like you are not necessarily a fan of viewing all of life through the lens of race then?

whenever you are being so obviously dishonest

Difference in perception, isn't the same as a difference in individual honesty, is my opinion.

If, as the author of the article states, the earliest ancestors to humans were dark-skinned Africans, then how is it false to say that dark-skinned Africans are the closest human descendants to monkeys?

I want to unmask the lie that evolution denial is about religion and recognize that at its core, it is a form of white supremacy that perpetuates segregation and violence against Black bodies.

see that's the difference - you make claims of dishonesty, I used ignorance as a tool

Just so I'm not misunderstanding you, your intention was to bait me into arguing a point that was off topic - a point that you now admit misrepresented my position? And your deception in getting me to do this was done in order to show how dishonest I am? Was the rudeness and demeaning language also a part of this deception, or was that genuine?

yeah the race essentialism is very, very bad and needs to be stopped.

so I accidentally misrepresented you - though I would have done that regardless - to get you to admit that you were dishonest.  

"CRT recognizes that racism is engrained in the fabric and system of the American society. The individual racist need not exist to note that institutional racism is pervasive in the dominant culture. This is the analytical lens that CRT uses in examining existing power structures. CRT identifies that these power structures are based on white privilege and white supremacy, which perpetuates the marginalization of people of color. CRT also rejects the traditions of liberalism and meritocracy. Legal discourse says that the law is neutral and colorblind, however, CRT challenges this legal “truth” by examining liberalism and meritocracy as a vehicle for self-interest, power, and privilege."

-UCLA School of Public Affairs

https://spacrs.wordpress.com/what-is-critical-race-theory/

All white people benefit from white privilege at the expense of other races, whether they admit it or not. And while the phrase "everything is racist" could be viewed as an oversimplified generalization, CRT is about examining society looking for any racial disparities which serve as "proof" that systemic racism exists. So the reason people say "everything is racist" is because you can examine anything - even the ratio of trees in white and black neighborhoods - and point to it as a form of systemic racism. These "proofs" are outcomes of power structures created to benefit white people.

Please explain how this is not concurrent with Critical Race Theory in an American context? Is UCLA just as wrong as DiAngelo apparently is?

Yes white privilege exists if you are white your chances of getting pulled over without reason are significantly lower.

"the systemic oppression of a racial group to the social, economic, and political advantage of another"

"a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race"

Yes white privilege exists if you are white your chances of getting pulled over without reason are significantly lower. I am white my chances of getting pulled over are significantly lower which is a fact if you would like the study ask.

In our data, the success rate of searches (or the hit rate) is generally lower for Hispanic drivers compared to white drivers; so the outcome test indicates Hispanic drivers face discrimination. For black drivers, search hit rates are typically in line with those of white drivers, indicating an absence of discrimination.

"the systemic oppression of a racial group to the social, economic, and political advantage of another"

The results show that police stopped and searched black and Latino drivers on the basis of less evidence than used in stopping white drivers, who are searched less often but are more likely to be found with illegal items.

If there really was widespread systemic discrimination I don't think you'd need to use statistical modeling with who knows how many assumptions to tease it out, the raw numbers would do the job for you.