Straw man. I never said they were the same.
You attributed an argument to me which is informed by "risk-reduction." If you are conceding that they are not the same, then why are you scrutinizing the statement: "The vaccine prevents neither the contraction nor the spread of the virus"?
(And that's not a straw-man, by the way.)
Not a non sequitur. Throughout this thread you have been saying that covid vaccines were futile and getting them wouldn't help old people or immunocompromised people because they don't affect spread, so there was no point in most people getting the covid vax.
Quote me verbatim.
Now you want to make it sound as if
"Wanting to make it sound as if" is not the same as what I stated. "What it sounds like" is your impression, not my argument.
the only thing you claimed is "the vaccine prevents neither the contraction or spread of the virus" which is fine because you haven't offered any proof that's true anyway.
That is not the only thing I've "claimed," but then again, you did enter this discussion late. Perhaps you'll read from the very beginning and see all the arguments made by myself and others to understand what is being "claimed."
And proof? Once again, read what is being stated. Don't just react.
So the CDC is only reporting data on people they've actually studied.
I'd presume so.
Funny
Funny is irrelevant.
that you think
You don't know what I "think."
the CDC is such a shoddy source
Quote me verbatim.
that it's the one you chose when I asked you for a source.
All the more reason it'd be counterintuitive that I'd call it a "shoddy source." And guess what? I didn't. Perhaps, it would be more prudent that you look up ecological inference than to project your impressions.
I said vaccines help the body recognize spike proteins and create antibodies.
Also, if people are fighting off covid because they have antibodies already introduced from the vaccine
You said a more practical response instead of vaccination is "to just simply practice good hygiene (and nutrition.)" And I said washing your hands doesn't help create antibodies. So no you did not say that washing hands creates antibodies, but you're saying washing hands is "a more practical response" which is not true for many people.
Practicing good hygiene is the primary way to prevent the contraction and spread of infection. Did you not know that?
But yes I did engage you, and you did not even answer the first question I asked you when you said most people in "hotbeds" have already had covid. I asked you how you came to that conclusion and you chose to ignore that question.
It was an inductive argument. That is, supposing certain conditions were true, the logical extension of the premise would be so, and so. Here look:
If we are to take the epidemicity of this virus seriously, then that would suggest that most who live in the "hotbeds" have been exposed.
I don't take the epidemicity seriously. And "hotbed" by definition is directly related to exposure.
No, the CDC does not support your argument. I asked if you can show me the data you have where it says vaccines have no impact on contracting or spreading the virus.
That's not my argument. My argument is once again:
The vaccine prevents neither the contraction nor the spread of the virus.
And the CDC report does support it. I won't defend an argument I didn't make.
You did not explicitly use the word "useless."
So case closed.