-->
@3RU7AL
No never heard of it, what is it? I am too lazy to google it right now
It seems that most skeptics are unwilling to see the proof (evidence) of Gods existence and mainly ask questions that are not relevant to the subject, because, i think, they really don't want an answer.
No never heard of it, what is it? I am too lazy to google it right now
It seems that most skeptics are unwilling
How many people does the bible say the devil killed , Brother?Regarding the Devil, and I know I am preaching to the choir with you, the only people the Devil killed within the scriptures were the ten people all from the same family of Job. To make it worse, the killing was a side wager with Jesus' agreement and permission, just to prove a petty egotistical point regarding God's favorite pet at the time, named Job. That's why Jesus wouldn't allow the Devil to actually kill off Job, but what about Job's family or others, they are allowed to be killed in this bet! (Job 1:6-1)
Conversely, I don't have to tell you in how many MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS of Jesus' Jewish creation, along with non-jewish people, have been killed by Jesus the Christ as Yahweh God incarnate! At times, they were unfortunately BRUTAL murders by Jesus, but I accept this Biblical axiom and try and move on the best way that I can.
9 days later
Actually, the evidence ( or the interpretation of the evidence has been presented in this forum numerous times,
It seems that most skeptics are unwilling
It seems that most skeptics are unwilling to see the proof (evidence) of Gods existence.
and mainly ask questions that are not relevant to the subject,
because, i think, they really don't want an answer
When the creator takes someone out, it's not murder, it's just a change of location. He created us, so he can do what he wants with us.
When the creator takes someone out, it's not murder, it's just a change of location. He created us, so he can do what he wants with us.
That is like saying cause you have a child you should get to abuse them or kill them. A benevolent creator would work in a moral arena within natural law. If your gods view you as a chess piece to amuse them you have the wrong gods.
The first part of the book addresses the relationship between God and the universe. Spinoza was engaging with a Tradition that held: God exists outside of the universe; God created the universe for a reason; and God could have created a different universe according to his will. Spinoza denies each point. According to Spinoza, God is the natural world. Spinoza concludes the following: God is the substance comprising the universe, with God existing in itself, not somehow outside of the universe; and the universe exists as it does from necessity, not because of a divine theological reason or will.
You state what you feel and people can trust you or they don't. If they trust you it still doesn't mean they think you are right about the emotions you are feeling.
Actually, the evidence ( or the interpretation of the evidence has been presented in this forum numerous times,
we all have the same evidence, it's in how you interpret it that is the difference.
It seems that most skeptics are unwilling ............
Yes