Parler, the conservative version of twitter, should have been banned by big tech

Author: n8nrgmi

Posts

Total: 167
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
u keep deflecting. it doesn't make it ok for parler to do bad, just because liberals do bad. 

Bad is an ambiguous term defined solely by Authority.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,167
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
u keep deflecting. it doesn't make it ok for parler to do bad, just because liberals do bad. 
It does. If Twitter didn’t have a two-tier justice system then we wouldn’t be talking about Parler.
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@ILikePie5
It does. If Twitter didn’t have a two-tier justice system then we wouldn’t be talking about Parler.
parlor doesn't exist because there is a two-tiered system. Parlor exists because right wing loons perceive there to be a two-tiered system. There is a big distinction. 

ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,167
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
parlor doesn't exist because there is a two-tiered system. Parlor exists because right wing loons perceive there to be a two-tiered system. There is a big distinction. 
You’re telling me that Ayanna Presley does not deserve to be banned from Twitter after she said people should cause unrest on the streets? Gimme a break.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,167
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Greyparrot
Bad is an ambiguous term defined solely by Authority.
History seems to repeat itself doesn’t it?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@ILikePie5
It's a dangerous time my friend. It's best that you are seen as trusting authority right now. 
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@ILikePie5
You’re telling me that Ayanna Presley does not deserve to be banned from Twitter after she said people should cause unrest on the streets? Gimme a break.
i would need much more context than that. A peaceful protest is still unrest in the streets. Nothing in that statement suggests violence. 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,167
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Greyparrot
It's a dangerous time my friend. It's best that you are seen as trusting authority right now. 
You right. I’m a Bolshevik guys. Fuck the Menshiviks
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,167
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
i would need much more context than that. A peaceful protest is still unrest in the streets. Nothing in that statement suggests violence. 
You want to point me to the text where Trump said be violent? As for context this is BLM where domestic terrorists were destroying businesses.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,167
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
Is there a reason why Kathy Griffin still has her account after literally posting an image of her holding Trump’s head? How is that not inciting violence?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@ILikePie5
I’m a Bolshevik guys.

Careful now, the thing that passes for history among buffs is what authority deems proper history.
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@ILikePie5
You want to point me to the text where Trump said be violent?
He has on many occasions called for violence. He has told his followers to attack journalists, protesters, god only knows how many people at this point. 

As for context this is BLM where domestic terrorists were destroying businesses.
I don't believe i've ever heard of a BLM domestic terrorist. I think I would have remembered them setting bombs and carrying guns... oh wait that was trump supporters.

Is there a reason why Kathy Griffin still has her account after literally posting an image of her holding Trump’s head? How is that not inciting violence?
again, I do not know what you are talking about. Context is important. 
Conway
Conway's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 278
1
2
5
Conway's avatar
Conway
1
2
5
-->
@HistoryBuff
I don't believe i've ever heard of a BLM domestic terrorist. I think I would have remembered them setting bombs and carrying guns... oh wait that was trump supporters.
Really, you don't remember the reporter saying how peaceful everything was while there was stuff burning in the background?

I remember one story years ago where people were armed and interacted peacefully with the national guard protecting a gas station. 


Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Conway
Really, you don't remember the reporter saying how peaceful everything was while there stuff burning in the background?

I remember one story years ago where people were armed and interacted peacefully with the national guard to protect a gas station. 


Careful now.

Authoritative sources say this is all fake news.

HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@Conway
Really, you don't remember the reporter saying how peaceful everything was while there stuff burning in the background?
So to you any riot is terrorism? Is that the argument you are making?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
So to you any riot is terrorism? Is that the argument you are making?
You should consult with proper authoritative sources to clarify what a terrorist is.

Asking people for opinions is dangerous right now.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@n8nrgmi
Parler can be slowed, not banned. The internet is way past that.

But liberals are being contradictory. If Twitter is a private company and can do what they want  why can't Parler?

For the people who are now "worried" about insurrection, where were you when BLM and antifa were burning down American cities?

Big tech sees Parler as a business threat, the nonsense about violence is a cover. But it's too late. The rise of sites like OANN, Gab, Parler, and Newsmax is the future. Twitter, FB, and Google have already lost the battle, they just don't know it yet. And they were exposed by Trump.

The NFL and NBA are tanking. So are the traditional news broadcasters. The demand for alternatives is growing, and this being America, someone will supply that demand.

The young brilliant tech savvy history ignorant liberals who started these now big tech companies and are now drunk with power will face the same path as the brilliant industrialization savvy brilliant history ignorant liberals before them. Ten years from now, Twitter will be today's AOL. The internet functioned just fine before the apple and google stores. Parler can no more be blocked than can porn.
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@ILikePie5
Since inciting violence is a crime, explain how a prosecutor would argue that Kathy Griffin holding a sculpture of Trump's head would qualify as being guilty of that crime. I would love to hear this. 

As an aside, which Dems called for unrest in the streets? By "unrest" I assume you mean destruction or murder since the Trump cult was calling to hang Mike Pence as they marched toward him with zip ties and planted bombs around the RNC and DNC. I also assume you're talking about high profile Democrats -- like politicians (even though none are as powerful as the president) since all the people calling for blood on twitter haven't been removed; they're still there. Just the president has been removed since he is the cult leader. What is the BLM/Democrat cult leader equivalent you're thinking of that is analogous to this? I remember someone saying they might post bail but forget who. It reminded me of during the 2016 campaign when Trump said he would post bail for people who hit others in his defense as well, but I digress. 

Anyway back to Kathy Griffin. Let's say you are a prosecutor. Make that case for me.
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@Greyparrot
You are 100% right. The way to FiGhT aUtHoRiTy   is to criminalize a private business being able to publish whatever they want.

The government should have to force private businesses to comply with what government says. You are so god damn wise. 

And you know what else? People should be able to rent an apartment in a house they own to someone from Guatemala (or hire them for a job at their company) without needing the GoVeRnMeNtS aPpRoVaL. Why do they need government papers? Is this Nazi Germany? Fuck authority. I'm so sick of these tyrants trying to regulate commerce and where people live or work and trade. Fuck authorityYyyYYyy. Freedom to all! No regulation necessary, especially from the most empowered tyrants of all - government! I know you agree with this entirely so sorry for preaching to the choir. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Danielle
Well said comrade.
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@Greyparrot
"YES, GIRL. PREACH!" as they say. 

I forgot to add that if China owns Google then China should be the one who dictates what Google has to publish. 

Or maybe our government should dictate since the Chinese government can't be trusted to not be tyrants but our politicians can be trusted.

Oh wait, no we can't trust government authority. So we have to trust Google's authority. Oh wait no those are the tyrants. Wait I'm confused.  

OH RIGHT ONLY DONALD TRUMP CAN BE TRUSTED ugh duh stupid me for forgetting. Never mind. Thinking is hard. 


Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Danielle
You really can't trust media these days unless they have made the proper political tributes to DC, or China.

I can get you a comprehensive list if you are afraid of being manipulated by unapproved sources.

Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@Greyparrot
No need - I rely on unvetted citizen journalists with no experience, credentials, evidence or context. YouTube or bust is what I say. #StayWoke 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Danielle
How utterly brave of you in this brave new world.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@ILikePie5
Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful. My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power. Within the next generation, I believe that the world's rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than tear gas and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@HistoryBuff
again, I do not know what you are talking about. Context is important. 
Then be educated
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@Greyparrot
I am very brave, thank you for noticing. I gathered up my courage and tried watching CNN where they said "Trump supporters" stormed the capitol but I knew it was a lie cuz it was clearly ANTIFA. They are just trying to make Republicans look bad! Those were clearly ANTIFA tactics as you never see Trump supporters do that stuff. Most of them were crisis actors. And those crisis actors are proof we won't take it anymore and will lash out! See it was them but it was really us.

ANTIFA are the ones who caused a scene except that brave woman Ashli Babbitt who got shot dead. She wasn't ANTIFA but everyone else was.  And all the other patriots that are promising to riot again in defense of Trump all over social media are also ANTIFA. See the media won't tell you that.

They lied and said it was Trump supporters just because Trump supporters are the ones promising to riot and everyone there claimed to support Trump. How does that make any sense? This is why you can't trust the media. Unless it's the #1 most popular and most viewed news work Fox News, it's too mainstream. You can't trust the mainstream news you can only trust Fox News which is the most popular and therefore not mainstream. Also the patriots stormed the captiol but actually it was ANTIFA. Just to be clear. I'm glad you get it. #DontBeASheep
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Danielle
This is why you can't trust the media.

You can trust crony media. The powerful know the truth.
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
'respect my authoritah'

fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 3,565
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
Gee, should we also ban all the progressive threats to followers of the Prince of Peace? Goes both ways, my friend, so be careful what you advocate censoring. I think maybe the 1A has it right in its unstated, but obvious interpretation: You have the right to be offended, but you do not have the right to censor by way of response.