I don’t consider anything a perfect fact.
No, I’m suggesting that by definition objective things don’t require a mind for its existence and facts are objective. I don’t know why you’re disputing this by definition I’m correct
I don’t consider anything a perfect fact.
Please provide an example of something you believe is objective.
Please provide an example of something you believe is objective.Morality
Ah I'll admit I mispoke there, my syllogism proper, refers that, "All principles used to affirm morality are from the mind" So that refers to princples in a context not talking about scientific principles, but of things asserted to be true because of a mind, for example: Justice - if this was a principle used in a moral system, you are talking about a construct, justice doesn't exist unless their is some sort of agents to want it, and it only exists because of constructs, that's more what I was referring to their, its a specific sort of principle, the ones used to affirm morality, that I'm talking about, and I use this definition:Now, it could be asserted that, based on a definition of principle: "A fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning." that I'm wrong, but the "fundamental truth" part could be in reference to, say, evolution as much as it could be to morality, hence why i specified, used to affirm morality, because that would be talking about the "or proposition"... unless you were to prove that your principle used to affirm morality was the first type of principle, then you'd be right, unless of course that principle doesn't link up to morality without an arbitary link.Then it would be subjective.
I don’t know if I can, but that shouldn’t be necessary unless your a nihilist.
I’m curious to know about Taoism
This seems more like an excerpt rather than an explanation.
Okay, so what do you think of my explanation?
Then what do I need to elaborate on?
a lifestyle that leads to eternal happiness.
a lifestyle that leads to eternal happiness.My explanation of objective morality that you asked for.
No it means you will be sad if you don’t live the correct lifestyle.
What’s the point of asking me the same question twice?
Unfortunately in this game of life the ultimate answer is unknown to me, I just know the basics. Take the Ten Commandments for example.
A moral claim cannot be false.In the same way a statement of opinion cannot be false.A moral claim cannot be true.In the same way a statement of opinion cannot be true.
What is your personal opinion regarding the "objective morality" of copyright law?
Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m sure the good book mentions something along the lines of obeying the law of the land so that’s your answer.
A moral claim cannot be false.In the same way a statement of opinion cannot be false.A moral claim cannot be true.In the same way a statement of opinion cannot be true.Then what is morality? If you can’t be right or wrong?
ALL LAWS ARE MORAL.
ALL LAWS ARE MORAL.Not necessarily, but breaking the law is immoral.
